Pros And Cons Of Censorship In Fahrenheit 451
Blocking children from seeing or hearing things keeps children from being able to think for themselves. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury writes about a society that forces people not to be able to think at all. The society is completely censored and the government has full control over everyone. In order to keep our rights and freedom, America does not need censorship. The act of censorship takes away the rights to read, the freedom of speech, and the ability to discover new knowledge.
Censorship takes away the rights to read. In the article entitled “ Judy Blume: A Leader in the Anti Censorship Movement,” the author states, “ She talked about her commitment to children's intellectual freedom and their right to read a variety of …show more content…
In the article “ pros and cons of censorship,” by Parbhakar Pillai it says “ It is useful in hiding sensitive military information, which could be used by an enemy state.” Therefore, sensitive military information is something people should not have access to because such information does not need to be let out. For this reason, Opponents believes that censorship protects sensitive military information. Though it is a valid argument that censorship hids sensitive materials, people have the right to know what goes on around them.
As previously stated, Ray Bradbury deals with the issue of censorship in Fahrenheit 451. In the novel, Ray talks about a society that is completely controlled by the government. “ There must be something in books, things we can't imagine, to make a women stay in a burning house; there must be something there.” Although other believe books are bad, and should be burned. People have no right to go in other people's homes, and destroy their property because of their belief.
In order to keep our rights and freedoms, America does not need censorship. Censorship removes the rights to read. It also wipes out freedom of speech. Censorship blocks people from discovering new knowledge. Without censorship, people are more free to do and say whatever they
Censorship takes away the rights to read. In the article entitled “ Judy Blume: A Leader in the Anti Censorship Movement,” the author states, “ She talked about her commitment to children's intellectual freedom and their right to read a variety of …show more content…
In the article “ pros and cons of censorship,” by Parbhakar Pillai it says “ It is useful in hiding sensitive military information, which could be used by an enemy state.” Therefore, sensitive military information is something people should not have access to because such information does not need to be let out. For this reason, Opponents believes that censorship protects sensitive military information. Though it is a valid argument that censorship hids sensitive materials, people have the right to know what goes on around them.
As previously stated, Ray Bradbury deals with the issue of censorship in Fahrenheit 451. In the novel, Ray talks about a society that is completely controlled by the government. “ There must be something in books, things we can't imagine, to make a women stay in a burning house; there must be something there.” Although other believe books are bad, and should be burned. People have no right to go in other people's homes, and destroy their property because of their belief.
In order to keep our rights and freedoms, America does not need censorship. Censorship removes the rights to read. It also wipes out freedom of speech. Censorship blocks people from discovering new knowledge. Without censorship, people are more free to do and say whatever they