Preview

Pros And Cons Of Civil Disobedience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
799 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Civil Disobedience
Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote, 'Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.' The fathers of our country fought and successfully broke apart the chains of England's rule. Yet, time and time again “We the people” unknowingly put ourselves back in them. Thus, it becomes the duty of every American to work tirelessly until the chains are broken apart once more. Every so often, we are granted a changemaker behind whom we can mobilize. Throughout history, great leaders have approached the breaking apart of the government's chains in many different ways, but they can most often be classified under two categories, those who advocate for civil disobedience and those who support violent protests. The latter, is nothing more than a flawed contradiction. …show more content…
Civil disobedience, or satyagraha, is the reason the 1.2 billion citizens of India are able to stand outside the Red Fort knowing they are free from Britain’s rule. Old or young, no one in India will forget August 15th, the day Prime Minister Nehru raised the green, white and orange symbol of India’s independence above the Lahori Gate. Civil disobedience is one of the most important reasons why the Berlin Wall no longer divides France. It’s why South Africa no longer has apartheid. All modern day and historical examples of peaceful unrest have one thing in common: a fight for equality. That is precisely why peaceful resistance, while beneficial in the more general sense, has no effect (either positive or negative) on a so called “free …show more content…
The basis of this protest was to fight against inequality. It was to fight against the gender pay gap. It was to fight the voter suppression that disproportionately affects African Americans and women. It was an opportunity for all people in America to stand up, and as New Wave Feminists president La Rosa claims, to “send a bold message … that women’s rights are human rights”. Similarly, the Black Lives Matter movement advocates for “freedom and justice for all Black lives”. The movement centers on fighting for equality for “those that have been marginalized”. Even protests regarding climate change follow this same phenomenon. Dastagir from USA Today explains, “the marchers were led by indigenous groups from around the world… these indigenous people are often the first victims of climate change.” Climate change continues to create inequality. The commonality between every example of peaceful resistance not only in America, but also in the world is that they all happen because of injustice and inequality. Insofar as a “free society” is a society where every citizen is equally recognized and presented with fair justice (Tyler), a free society essentially eliminates the need for peaceful resistance in the first place. Thus, there is no measurable impact peaceful resistance can have. In fact, it seems plausible that in a free society, civil disobedience

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    All through history governments and empires have been overthrown or defeated primarily by the violence of those who oppose them. This violence was usually successful however, there have been several situations, when violence failed, that protesters have had to turn to other methods. Non-violent protesting never seemed to be the right course of action until the ideology of Mohandas Gandhi spread and influenced successful protests across the world. Non-violent methods were successfully used, most notably, by Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi employed a campaign of peaceful resistance in the first half of the twentieth so that India could be independent from Great Britain and possess institutions that protected the rights of Indians. Some years later, American civil rights organizations continued this approach, organizing sit-ins and marches to force governments to change policies that discriminated against African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote that civil disobedience,“seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue”. It uses the power of the people to force institutional action. Civil disobedience tactics can be just as effective today, just look at Cedric Herrou a French farmer who illegally transported African migrants into France for humanitarian reasons.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Disobedience is a very controversial topic due to the fact that history represents such a wide range of extremities of this ideology. Disobedience can be perceived in many different ways and it can either help or destroy the structure of society. An example of disobedience in society that has proved very successful in the past is civil disobedience. Throughout history, civil disobedience has made a huge impact on the U.S. government and is responsible for several popular social reforms. Many of the world’s most inspirational leaders used civil disobedience to reconstruct society and develop remarkable social change. Examples of these leaders include Ghandi, Martin Luther King Jr., Susan B. Anthony, and Rosa Parks. These people were able to…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This boycott led to the Agricultural Labor Relations Act that ends the cycle of misery and exploitation. Cesar Chavez fight for justice did not end there, He went on to compose several other boycotts and hunger strikes for the rights of workers. These different peaceful protests are en example as to how they have positively impacted society and why peaceful protest are need for a free society. Change is forever needed, and is the only way to get better and not worst. For there to be change there must be a group of people who fight for this change, and that fight is in the form of these peaceful protests. For as long as The United States of America has been alive, this form of protest has always been the only way to change with the generations. As Millennials grow there views on old laws and constitutional right change, They want a government that grows with them. That is were the subject of Black Lives Matter comes up, Today African-American are protesting for equality between black people and white…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sioux Tribe Summary

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue with asking as to whether a free society will be benefited or harmed by peaceful resistance is that it is implying that the people within the given society are truly free, while the truth is that by resisting a system that is either discriminating or exploiting its citizenry, you are exposing the truth that its people are…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance, historically referred to as “civil disobedience”, is a long-standing American tradition practiced throughout history in times of public turmoil and political fracas. From the opening stages of the United States, to the tergiversate of the civil right movement, civil disobedience continues to take its place in the moral actions of the American people. The right to defend one's unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is an ideal that was both important to the Founding Fathers, and to Americans today. Influential leaders of the world such as John Dickinson, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Luther King Jr., along with many others, promoted and demonstrated the benefits and positive affects of peaceful protesting to achieve their goals, as well as establish a legacy and a path for revolution. Likewise, a peaceful…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, if we consider civil disobedience to negatively impact a free society, only two options remain: bitter violence or acceptance of the status quo. The premise that violence is worse than pacifism is easy to accept. People who attempt to evoke social or political change through violence are not revered; they are called terrorists, and they shut down the conversation about whatever injustice they are protesting. For every Martin Luther King, there will be a Malcolm X; for every Mohandas Gandhi, there exists a Rash Behari Bose. Although all four contributed to their cause, only two left behind a legacy of hope that carries on to this day.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, peaceful protests only effectuate change when the participants are lawful and accepting of consequences. Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr, and Nelson Mandela are examples of participants who used civil disobedience to leave an impression. Gandhi adopted ideas from Henry David Thoreau’s, 'On the Duty of Civil Disobedience', to shape his approach to obstruct corruption. During the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr. constantly promoted peace and justice to the nation, despite the vulnerable position he held. Nelson Mandela also acted upon Thoreau’s ideas when he attempted to end the apartheid in South Africa. Each of these three activists successfully effectuated modifications to their country’s government. However, if participants were to resist legislation without accepting the repercussions, it would promote anarchy. Without legal cooperation, their actions would represent utter lawlessness. The government of a free society is designed to consider its people’s best interests, so why would it be effective to bite the hand that feeds? When individuals do not accept consequences associated with resistance, they obstruct the necessary mutual respect between the individual and the state. Without which the purpose of resistance would be insignificant, as the authority would have no desire to cooperate with the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout our history as a free society, countless nonviolent protests have arisen as a means to try to create change. Peaceful protest is not a new concept, even in America. Henry David Thoreau, a Transcendentalist writer in the 19th century, refused to pay taxes because he did not support the Mexican War. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau claims that so many men today blindly follow the government’s wishes and that “in most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense.” Peaceful protest is a way for men to “be men first, and subjects afterward,” expressing their opinions and acting as a catalyst for change in a free state. Without peaceful resistance, there would be little diversity of ideas; the government would control all policy without much regard to minority opinion, and scant progress would be made. Peaceful resistance is a means in which citizens are able to influence the laws and encourage progress. From Thoreau’s time to now, civil disobedience, to put it in Mr. Thoreau’s terms, has played a positive and necessary role in…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through appreciating the dynamic place peaceful resistance has in world history, society can recognize the potential civil disobedience has as a force for good.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience is the act of disobeying authority but in a legal and civilized manner. It was introduced by writer Henry David Thoreau in his work named “Civil Disobedience.”This legal and orderly method of rebelling is often used in hope that a change will be made such as an unjust law. Many people often wonder whether Civil Disobedience still holds true in the day and age. Everyday civil disobedience is used. Whether it is aginst the government…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stand Up Human progress has been marked by progress when groups of people that are perceived to be powerless rise up against a superior entity. Whether it was the Boston Tea Party against the policy of “taxation without representation”, leading to the oldest democracy or Gandhi’s defiant march to the sea in protest of the British monopoly on salt, resulting in the largest democracy in the world, it has been witnessed that peaceful resistance to laws is an effective method of gaining freedom, independence, and equality. Although civil disobedience is effective, it only is so if it is peaceful and dissidents should be careful not to be blinded by their passions and harm anybody neither directly nor indirectly. One of the most publicized authors…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our country has been founded upon civil disobedience - just ask the Sons and Daughters of Liberty. Even during a time where our country was controlled by an…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful Protest

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peaceful Protest and civil disobedience have been a hallmark of change from the early 20th century onwards. Though nonviolent efforts, multiple civil movements have peacefully broken a law in order to protest an injustice of said law. Usually done in a coordinated manner by a large group of people, these protest have been strikingly effective in bettering the systems they have set out to change. Peaceful resistance is therefore one of the most effective ways of protesting and correcting unjust and broken laws, and is a staple of free society.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience will always positively impact a society that calls itself free, because a free society must allow for dissent. Peaceful resistance to law creates dialogue between people on both sides of the issue.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays