Pros And Cons Of Darwin's Theory Of Natural Selection

For years, a sundry of the most influential people have weighed in on the debate which contrasts the pros and cons of teaching intelligent design in a science class compared to solely teaching evolution. Many have recently swayed to a pro intelligent design mindset due to scientists having no empirical evidence to explain Charles Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection, which is said to be the process in which our world’s structure of evolution follows. Darwin’s theory implies that species exist due to the natural change in which they inhabit to survive their environment; yet, it lacks the explanation on how the origin of life began. Thus, causing a suggestion of an intelligent designer who created nature to make it how it appears today. Nevertheless, scientists have a major issue with this hypothesis; claiming that the only evidence is to prove it is the lack of so in Darwin’s theory. Therefore, both intelligent design and evolution should
This argument has spread to one of the most divine men in the world, Pope Leo XII. The Pope did not openly endorse evolution however, he implied that he was open to the theory and the study of. (Moncsuk 10). Even though a key argument in the matter of pro Darwinism is the worry of teachers using the classroom to promote religious beliefs if given the right to teach intelligent design, Cardinal Schonborn gave a further explanation of intelligent design. He claims that Darwinism does not have to do with faith but with science, and the church is okay with combining evolution with ID unless it interferes or doubts their said faith. (Moncsuk 9). Only 38% of Americans would not teach creationism over evolution in public schools (Boyd 1) which leads to an immense 62% of citizens who would be content with providing the information their students need to make an educated decision between Darwinism or