Preview

Pros And Cons Of Drone Warfare

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1014 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Drone Warfare
Drone warfare
Sure, attack drones are always fun to use in a game, but are they really that safe when it comes to actual warfare? Drones can have a huge impact in combat. They can make our defenses better, but sometimes they can provoke terrorist groups. Drones have made a huge impact on war since the use of drones has started, but that doesn't mean they do the best job they are meant to. There has been a lot of talk about how the U.S. can get pass the U.N. laws that prohibit some of the attacks that they have been making. Is it really helpful to kill a few amount of enemies to also be killing such a huge amount of innocent bystanders? With all of the drone attacks that have been going on in the world, there should be more thought out
…show more content…
Drone warfare is basically a loophole around international laws and policies. “Basic categories such as 'battlefield,' 'combatant,' and 'hostilities' no longer have a clear or stable meaning”(Stimson Center). We don't have a clear meaning to combat since the drone warfare has started. Although the American use of drones for targeted killing may be legal, the pervasive use of drones threatens the rule of law. President Obama stated at the National Defense University that "America's legitimate claim of self-defense cannot be the end of the discussion. To say a military tactic is legal, or even effective, is not to say it is wise or moral in every instance. For the same human progress that gives us the technology to strike half a world away also demands the discipline to constrain that power--or risk abusing it"(Benjamin).The majority of U.S. drone strikes have been made in secrecy and usually parts of the world that have minimal accessibility to journalist and human-rights. Even though drones can help there has been a lot of negative effects because of …show more content…
They can make our defenses better, but sometimes they can provoke terrorist groups and even kill innocent people that have nothing to do with the targets. This just makes the U.S. a bigger target with more and more people. Drone warfare is just a loophole to get around international laws that protect certain areas. In the last decade, there has been a significant number of deaths that could have been avoided if drones were not used. Even though the United States says they want peace, they are really just making it much worse for themselves by making new enemies. There are many people in the world that don't know that much about drone warfare, but if they really knew what drones did, they would not be happy. If everyone was to think of themselves in the shoes of the innocent families that are being killed, would they want to have them used on other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Just because we have the technological power to use drones to take people/things out, that does not necessarily mean that we should. The main concern being brought up, that while we as a nation may have always killed people with a certain form of ease in the name of war, it has come at a high cost. It is expensive, and not too easy. However, with this drone system it is easier, less expensive, and does not require so much blood shed. This is an area of concern because this may become us as a nation to become much more relaxed when it comes to moral…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaw states that one point in favor of drones is that they are weakening Al Qaeda, the taliban and affiliated groups. Also, they have a primary responsibility for protecting their own civilians. “Second, I doubt that ending drone strikes would substantially reduce anti-Americanism in the Islamic world or put a dent in radical recruitment.” However, that might be true, but they are still costing the lives of innocent civilians of those lives being women and children. Plaw says that to avoid these casualties drones can be sent out with a clearer justification of what it is going to do. He also explains that the drones are a lot less harmful to civilians then they are to Al Qaeda affiliates. The civilian casualties can be minimized therefore drones aren’t as dangerous as some…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They soar overhead collect intel and are capable of destroying a whole city! Drones often fly in the sky and you don't even notice them because they seem like regular airplanes,but they are capable of much more than just flying around.These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles spy on you daily. Drones should be illegal because they kill innocent humans, promote terrorism, and are expensive to maintain.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones can cause people to become terrorist. The people becoming terrorist most likely have had a loved one either die or be injured from a drone attack. As Amnesty International said, ”drone strikes can be classified as “war crimes” or illegal “extrajudicial executions.’” (Source K 9) Drones may also not hit the right target either, but drones are not meant to hit each and every target spot on. The people controlling the drones are not perfect and are allowed…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand the argument can be made that drones are invading the privacies of people and are a nuisance that will lead to a more robotic sky than a natural one. These are true and are concerns for the future, drones have a number of more benefits than cons. Drones provide a more stress free life and will lead to a more productive society because of their ability to be mobile and compact. Drones are the way of the future and will be seen more in the news and in more controversial debates but they are the best way to go heading into the future so they should be allowed to…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, companies have developed dozen of drone models ranging in size from large to small, all with a wide price and capabilities. Drone strikes were envented to serve the demands in the countries' war. It's easy to think that drones are wonderful invention help the U.S for attack but when you look at the facts then you know that because of drones attacks, there are lots of people died if even it was their fault at all. To make people can live in a world full of peace, instituting stricter regulation on use of drone attacks should not be applied.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While drones contain the advanced technology to guarantee the target will be annihilated, they cannot ensure that bystanders will not be harmed. For instance, in November of 2015, the US targeted 41 Taliban men and unfortunately 1,147 civilians were also killed in the drone strike. Residents in Pakistan, and other drone monitored countries constantly live in fear of when the next drone strike could occur. Additionally, between January 2009 and at the end of 2015, the United States government stated that between 64 and 116 non-combatants were devastatingly killed in a drone strike which only targeted one terrorist. The major opponents against drone usage, Economists, argue that if the family of a Pakistani man died in the midst of a drone strike, he may seek justice on the United States. Moreover, the father and husband of the deceased family could join the Taliban to plot his revenge against our country, therefore creating an additional terrorist fighting against the United…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many people do not fully and completely understand what a drone is. A drone is an unmanned aerial vehicle fitted with multiple cameras and sensors for measuring and capturing different things and sets of data. In a warzone drones can be equipped with different attachments and weapons, such a automatic guns and missiles, to carry out remote attacks, on insurgents or enemies of our country, without putting human operators of the drones in any danger whatsoever.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays