Pros And Cons Of Following The Articles Of Confederation

When the 13 colonies were declared independence from Britain on July, 4th, 1776, they realized the extremity of their intentions in the war and to coordinate with each other. Furthermore, they adopted the Articles of Confederation, which was a basis constitution which created an alliance of sovereign states which made the state's work with each other in military relations and foreign policies. Although the Articles of Confederation were helpful and established order, they weren't sufficient enough to hold the states united through the war. After the war, the states didn't even consider following the Articles of Confederation and decided to follow their own personal interests rather than thinking about the interests of the new free United States.
There were two political parties that were a products of the new uprising country; The Federalists and the Antifederalists. During the time, Congress was acting as the head of the government but only because as a country we lacked the legal structure of authority. In 1777, For Congress it was difficult to lay a new foundation of government in the center of a continued global war. America soon realized they had no political aims or experience in how to establish and form a successful country. Furthermore America resided to the republican political theory as well as their experiences as colonials. There was plenty of controversy about whether the ideals of the Federalists were stronger than that of the Anti federalists and vice versa, because the country was stuck and needed to find its path. It was soon proven that The political views of the Federalists were better than that of the Anti Federalists because they were more organized, had more experience and claimed to establish a strong central government that would preserve the individual liberties of the