Pros And Cons Of Helicopter Rescues

" On average 4 to 5 helicopters respond to calls each day"( helicopter rescues increasing on Everest 21) , "each helicopter is 2 million dollars each" ( helicopters rescues increasing on Everest 21). In my opinion people shouldn’t receive rescuer services because it does put rescuers at risk for getting serious injury or even death. I also think people that put themselves at risk do not have the right to receive to rescue services. Even so Rescuers are at high risk for injury or even death well responding. In the article "ranger killed during rescuer of climbers on mount rainier" the author says "Nick Hall, a climbing's range at mount rainier national park, fell 3,700 feet to his death Thursday afternoon, after helping rescue
two climbers who had fallen into creases' ( ranger killed during rescue of climbers on mount rainier 28) the quote shows that a rescuer was killed trying to help climbers. Although he saved the climbers, do you think that rescuers should lose their life's saving others? Rescue service equipment could cost a lot of money. In the article "helicopter rescues increasing on Everest " it says that "… the B3 cost about $2miilon dollars." (helicopter rescues increasing on Everest) My quote shows that how much there equipment is and $2 million is a lot of money. Do you think they should spend that much money on equipment? Some people might argue with me because it saves lives. Although it does, rescuers still get killed trying to save people who put themselves at risk. Just like Nick Hall died trying to save 2 climbers that were stuck.

I don’t think people should receive rescue services. Just think about it, if someone gets in trouble and a rescuer trys to save that person and dies, that is more people dying. I think people that put themselves at risk should not receive rescue services what do you think?