Preview

Pros And Cons Of Hitler's Negotiate A Peace Deal With Britain

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Hitler's Negotiate A Peace Deal With Britain
In the summer of 1940, Winston Churchill was forced to seriously consider Hitler’s offer to negotiate a peace deal with Britain. The geopolitical situation was beset with significant uncertainty, and Britain’s survival was legitimately at stake. Churchill was faced with the possibilities of (1) actively pursuing a deal, (2) delaying negotiation to a further point in time, or (3) refusing to negotiate. The merits and drawbacks of each decision were based on the following assumptions: (a) Hitler’s purpose for proposing a deal, (b) his overall war aims, (c) Britain’s ability to wage war against Germany, (d) the likelihood of American support, and (e) the value added of the potential American support. Confronted with how to best protect Britain’s

Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Lewis Gaddis Summary
    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Lewis Gaddis Summary

    In this book writer, John Lewis Gaddis has talked about how Russia and eastern Europe are changing the way history specialists take a gander at the icy war. The primary contention that was made by the writer in this book was " How Soviet's perspective of one-sided security crashed into US's conviction that security is multilateral to create two ranges of prominence: one of compulsion and one of assent." The Partners Atlantic Contract, August 1941,Roosevelt, and Churchill announced 3 Wilsonian after war goals to guarantee global security through a multilateral approach: self-assurance, open market, and aggregate security. Stalin had firmly connected state security with his very own security and trusted security must be accomplished by denying every other person of it and picking up an area while the US thought of security as an aggregate decent inescapable clash.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    It Was the Strength of the Opposition Forces, Both Liberal and Conservative, Rather Than the Ineptitude and Stubbornness of President Wilson That Led to the Senate Defeat of the Treaty of Versailles.
    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It Was the Strength of the Opposition Forces, Both Liberal and Conservative, Rather Than the Ineptitude and Stubbornness of President Wilson That Led to the Senate Defeat of the Treaty of Versailles.

    After the war ended, Allied leaders and President Wilson were faced with putting Europe back together the way it was before the war. Certain events led to the Senate’s defeat of the treaty. Wilson was an optimistic progressive, with striking policies for the outlook of Europe. Many of these plans were shut down by other leaders; Wilson still approved the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles because his prime issue, the League of Nations, was still included. Many people of the world did not see the League as a good idea. They wanted and were promised the war to end in a peace and “moralize nationalism”, but the treaty did not reach their expectations (Document B). It planned to prevent effects that were conflicting by using the same things for opposition. It wanted to use force to destroy force, militarism to prevent militarism, et cetera (Document A). Americans recognized that the resolutions projected and allowed by Wilson were condemned to fail.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Warren F. Kimball's Forged In War
    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Warren F. Kimball's Forged In War

    In Warren F. Kimball's novel, Forged in War- Roosevelt, Churchill, and the Second World War, the unique relationship between Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill. The two created a friendship to lead the Allied powers out of the shadow of the Third Reich. Although the two were not fond of each other in the beginning, the respect that they had for each other was the bond that held them together. Kimball argues the main points on why the world went to war in the 1930's. He proves the theory that an American-Anglo alliance during World War II to be wrong and that it is a false conclusion.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the View That the Disagreements About the Second Front Were the Most Significant Cause of Tension Between Russia and the West Between 1941-5?
    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Assess the View That the Disagreements About the Second Front Were the Most Significant Cause of Tension Between Russia and the West Between 1941-5?

    The Second Front was, according to Philips and Roberts, a major source of tension between the USA, Britain and Russia during World War II. Philips states “To Stalin the need to open up a Second Front in Western Europe against Germany in order to relieve the pressure on the USSR in the East was a pressing necessity. Yet the refusal of Britain and the USA to do so until the time was right led Stalin to be suspicious of their motives.”[1] Roberts backs up Philips’s argument up by pointing out that there had been numerous failed agreements by the Allies to land troops in order to create a Second Front in 1942, and the issue was discussed in the Tehran conference of 1943[2]. However on closer inspection, neither argument is particularly strong. For example, although Philips points out that Russia was at risk of being invaded by Germany in 1941 and therefore had an strong reason for demanding the Second Front despite the fact that defeating Germany was not the USA’s or Britain’s main concern. Churchill was concerned with the risk of casualties a Second Front would create. He also had military interests in North Africa during 1942[3] and Italy during 1943[4] and…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Outline 31.1
    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Outline 31.1

    iii. The British, however, had no desire to confront the German dictator. Some even thought that Hitler’s actions constituted a justifiable response to the terms of the Versailles treaty, which they believed had been too harsh…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tension and Suspicion Between U.S. and Russia
    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tension and Suspicion Between U.S. and Russia

    At the start of the first world war, Germany and the Soviet Union signed a nonaggression pact. With Germany and the Soviet Union being allies, the rest of the world had their suspicions. In the U.S., Senator Truman expressed his dislike of both countries and his view of them as potential enemies(Doc A). Unfortunately for the Soviet Union, the pact between him and Hitler was soon broken by a German invasion. The invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941 was a surprise to everyone, especially Stalin who was not prepared for it. According to Churchill, it was the turning point of the war. This turn on Stalin seemed like a great thing, if the Soviet Union hadn’t collapsed so quickly. With the fear of the Soviet Union’s surrender, Churchill and Roosevelt secretly met in the historic Atlantic Conference in August 1941. An outcome of the conference was the eight-point Atlantic Charter, where Churchill and Roosevelt agreed to defeat Germany before turning to Japan, and they planned for a new world organization, and affirmed their commitment to self-determination for all nations.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Strategy of the Allies on D-Day
    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Strategy of the Allies on D-Day

    In the years since 1945, it has become increasingly evident that the alliance between the British and the United States was often in disagreement over the correct strategy to insure the final defeat of the Axis powers. Early on, both British and American staffs could agree that Germany represented a greater military threat than Japan, but they did not often see eye to eye on the strategy that would most efficiently defeat them.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Documents Of The Sinew Of Peace
    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Documents Of The Sinew Of Peace

    The consequences of a Break down in Four-Power of the Negotiations on Germany, to take action…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Ww2 Good War?
    • 3183 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Ww2 Good War?

    [ 7 ]. Talbot Imlay, Facing the Second World War: strategy, politics and economics in Britain and France 1938 – 1940, (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2003), 111.…

    • 3183 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Great Britain Justified In Civil Disobedience?
    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Great Britain Justified In Civil Disobedience?

    Chamberlain makes the point that the liberty of each independent state of Europe is at risk if no intervention occurs. Each nation that has the capability of resisting German aggression and intervening in the situation has a duty to preserve liberty; Great Britain does not stand alone in this fight. Chamberlain concludes his speech by saying: I feel bound to repeat that, while I am not prepared to engage this country by new unspecified commitments operating under conditions which cannot now be foreseen, yet no greater mistake could be made than to suppose that, because it believes war to be a senseless and cruel thing, this nation has so lost its fibre that it will not take part to the utmost of its power in resisting such a challenge if it ever were made. For that declaration I am convinced that I have not merely the support, the sympathy, the confidence of my fellow-countrymen and countrywomen, but I shall have also the approval of the whole British Empire and of all other nations who value peace, indeed, but who value freedom even…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Did The United States Lose The Munich Agreement?
    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Did The United States Lose The Munich Agreement?

    Unfortunately he could not persuade his fellow British politicians because the United States had decided to remain neutral on the topic of German pressures on Czechoslovakia. The United State’s neutrality stance put more pressure on Neville Chamberlain to try and prevent another war. It was not entirely surprising, though, that Chamberlain had taken the lead in seeking to bring about a peaceful settlement of the German-Czechoslovakia dispute. Although Great Britain did not have a formal treaty commitment to Czechoslovakia like France did, she was the more powerful country at the time and France had increasingly came to accept British leadership even on continental affairs. Moreover, if the Germans were to go to war with France, Great Britain would also become involved so it was natural to have Great Britain rather than France seeking to bring about a peaceful, if not amicable, settlement of the German…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peace During The Cold War
    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Peace During The Cold War

    For the nature of this essay, peace is defined as a period without a conflict involving fatalities of more than 1,000 military members. The United States and the U.S.S.R. knew that a war could be started by the push of the button, 2 pounds of force. There are many reasons for why a war was not started during the 43-year period, one of which is known at the Security Dilemma. Part of the Offense-Defense Model, the Security Dilemma is a Neorealist tradition whereas one state increases its security it subsequently decreases the security of others. In relation to the Cold War, Gaddis writes that after the fall of Germany, “there was less of an incentive for these former allies… to keep their anxieties under control. Each crisis that arose fed the next one, and with the result that a divided Europe became a reality.” The Security Dilemma is just one of the possible outcomes of the Offense-Defense…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of Treaty Of Versailles History Essay
    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of Treaty Of Versailles History Essay

    On the 28th June 1919, Germany resentfully signed the most famous treaty ever, Versailles. Although years of readjusting the treaty followed, this essay will focus mainly on the strengths and weaknesses of the 440 articles in 1919. The Treaty followed a massive war, with huge human sacrifice. It was supposed to be the Treaty to end all wars and give security to the countries involved. The overwhelming task that laid ahead for Woodrow Wilson (America), Lloyd George (Great Britain), Clemenceau (France) and Orlando (Italy) was on a bigger scale than any previous delegates had had to deal with.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Fight Against Communism
    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Fight Against Communism

    Why are people against Communist? J. Edgar Hoover, Sidney Hook, and William O. Douglas have written articles about their opinion relating to Communist expanding throughout our Nation. Communism is a social organization based on the ownership controlled all economic and social activities. J. Edgar Hoover, Sidney Hook, and William O. Douglas have numerous points of view on Communism. Their voices and minds reveals that Communist is not who they say they are.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Versailles Treaty
    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Versailles Treaty

    One underlying cause of WWII was the humiliation of Germany. In 1919, Germany took responsibility and blame for the damage caused during WWI. However, they felt that the Treaty of Versailles was an “atrocious injustice”. They saw the treaty as a humiliation and were infuriated for having to pay reparations. “The way in which Hitler restored a sense of pride, reawakened a sense of self-respect, forcing the world to look at Germany anew.” (Document D) This quote is significant because it shows how Hitler repaired and brought back pride in Germany. After WWI, Germans felt disgraced and wanted to regain themselves. The Treaty of Versailles worsened things by adding to the humiliation. This sparked Germans to fight back and take revenge. Hitler reunited Germany and convinced them to fight back. The next topic this essay will be discussing is troop reduction.…

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics