Preview

Pros And Cons Of Internet Neutrality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1242 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Internet Neutrality
As the Internet becomes an even more important part of American lives, a debate has started about its legal status. Some say that governmental regulation of the service will help solve issues that have recently come up. Supporters of this idea call it net neutrality. However, deeper analysis of net neutrality will reveal that it hurts the economy, consumers, and Internet providers while providing little benefit for content creators.
The model of the Internet as it is today is not very simple. Now, content providers such as Google and Netflix have servers inside Internet providers' networks. These severs are called peering connections and they allow consumers to have fast access to certain content (McMillan). Small businesses do not have these
…show more content…
Republicans have led the political battle against net neutrality (“Here's”). Internet providers join these politicians in the fight as well (Brodkin). They now must fight to reverse the laws set by the FCC so that the Internet can remain the same. Without these people, the way people access the Internet would be completely different.
Some opposers to net neutrality fear that regulation of the Internet may allow the government to spy on innocent citizens without people knowing. The government could do this by installing software that claims to monitor ISPs, but actually gather information on consumers (Steimle). With today's lack of privacy already, this extra spying may push people over the edge.
Another argument that net neutrality protesters point out is that net neutrality laws will have little effect. There are very few cases of Internet providers censoring or slowing down legal content (Shapiro). Without net neutrality laws, the Internet has become one of the biggest industries in the world. Since its conception, over one trillion dollars have been invested in the Internet (Wasserman). When dealing with such a large industry, radically changing its structure could have dangerous effects. This makes people question whether or not net neutrality will have the impact it intends to
…show more content…
He believes that net neutrality should be classified as a public utility (Estes). When questioned 80 percent of Americans support Obama's mission for net neutrality. However, 75 percent of Americans are not even familiar with what net neutrality is (Estes). This should make people question whether or not the net neutrality debate is understood by the people fighting in it and encourage citizens of the United States to learn more about the laws passed and how they affect their lives.
For a more educated opinion on open Internet laws, lawmakers could look to content creators. Nearly all content creators that have a voice in the debate show their support for net neutrality because they believe that the price they have to pay to give faster access is unfair (Kloc). With new laws in place, Internet providers are not allowed to censor or slow down content for financial gain (Liedtke). Content creators will be able to grow and develop without fearing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jrlc Chapter 2 Pt. 1

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    4. Your opinion: Will Congress or the FCC have to impose “net neutrality” on the Internet to preserve a robust marketplace of ideas?…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are people who think net neutrality is ethical; there are several reasons for it. Net neutrality gives non-discriminatory access to the internet which means every website and the content on the internet is treated in the same way. It treats each person in the same way also. For instance, a housewife describing a recipe and a millionaire talking about the company’s new product are treated equally. Net neutrality provides a platform for innovation and creativity. It gives a chance to grow up to new websites, online stores and other e-commerce websites.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Net neutrality”. Two words that seem to pop up every few years, met with the internet’s fury, just to disappear from the public’s collective conscience. Although the words are familiar, the definition is sometimes not. Net neutrality is defined by Dictionary.com as, “the concept that...internet service providers should provide nondiscriminatory access to Internet content…”. Net neutrality is often at risk, thanks to new law proposals that, similarly to the words, seem to keep popping up every few years. Most people would ask, why would such a thing keep coming under fire?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net neutrality is the idea that all content on the internet should be treated equally (Schewick, 2009). This means that ISP’s cannot discriminate against content by slowing down content they do not agree with or charging internet companies more to have certain content delivered faster (Schewick, 2009). Net neutrality has been the unspoken standard since the creation of the internet. This is because, when the internet was first created, ISP’s did not have the technology to determine which content was going through their network (Schewick, 2009). Since then, technology has improved and ISP’s now have the ability to determine which content is going through their network and effect its delivery to the end user (Schewick, 2009).…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Abolishing Net Neutrality Was a Bad Idea With the recent abolishment of net neutrality, an enormous discourse has risen about the legality and ethics of the abolishment of the Obama-era law. Although many argue that net neutrality is not useful for the United States, I think that net neutrality is needed in the interest of citizens. It preserves the internet as a public good and brings important economic benefits. While the opponents of net neutrality argue that the abolishing it will help the economy by reducing investment, I contend that preserving net neutrality allows the internet to be useful to more people and reduces the government’s over-controlling grip over us.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the recent expansions in the availability of technology, the ability to access information has become increasingly more common. This ability to search for information and view content through the internet is currently protected in the United States under a set of laws that are commonly referred to as Net Neutrality regulations. Although many people are unaware of what the concept of net neutrality is, it is understood that the results of any change to current internet regulations would affect have long-lasting effects on all internet users. “Net Neutrality” is a concept that was defined and popularized by Tim Wu, a legal scholar and net neutrality advocate, as being, “the idea that any network traffic… can move from one place to any other place without discrimination” (Lohr 1). Recently, this equal access to content has come under attack by certain groups that would stand to profit from the removal of current net neutrality regulations, such as internet service providers…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killswitch Documentary

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Net Neutrality is a topic of debate and confusion in the United States. It draws supporters as diverse as the Christian Coalition and moveon.org, pits traditional telecommunications companies like Verizon and Comcast against Internet giants such as Yahoo! and Google, and gives politicians yet another platform to raise an ongoing liberal-conservative debate over government regulation. So what is all this talk about? Philosophically, Net Neutrality is an ethical framework to govern access to the Internet. It advocates no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed. In 2005, the FCC embedded these principles into its policy with an objective to “encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet” (Policy Statement). This statement and proposed additional legislation is the source of continued controversy today. Fundamentally, the debate is grounded in opinions of necessity of Internet regulations and the repercussions of action or inaction. This paper will attempt to provide a context for the debate, a better understanding of the regulation and the possible implications, and a summary of the differing views.…

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of rolling back net neutrality is morally problematic. In this paper, I will demonstrate that utilitarianism can be used to show that repealing net neutrality is morally impermissible. In section one of this paper, I will provide an overview of net neutrality and show both sides of the argument. In section two, I will provide a brief and concise overview of Utilitarianism. In section three, I will demonstrate that utilitarianism can defend net neutrality.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to:1. become familiar with Net Neutrality.2. identify the impact of Net Neutrality on your daily life and use of the Internet.3. identify why people are for it and others oppose it.4. formulate your own opinion about Net Neutrality.Directions: Follow the step-by-step instructions and use Microsoft Word to respond to the questions below. Your response to questions one, two, and three should collectively be no less than 200 words (The word count excludes the text for the questions). All answers must be original – NO copy and pasting from websites! Also, you must also include in-text citations and cite any sources on a reference page using proper MLA or APA format.Complete a word count and post it on the bottom of the document. Be sure to indicate your name and date at the top of the document.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parker, Clifton B. "Greater Regulation Not Necessary for Internet, Stanford Scholar Says." Stanford News. N.p., 08 Apr. 2016. Web. 13 Feb. 2017.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people are for more control of the internet, especially of criminal acts or obscenities that the internet consist of. However net neutrality does not protect any illegal acts. The benefits of the eradication of net neutrality only come to a select group and that group is definitely not the consumer. That group is the hound dogs that control your access to the internet--your ISP(internet service provider).…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays