Preview

Pros And Cons Of Jean Glaucon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
493 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Jean Glaucon
Part 1:
“.. if we grant to both the just and unjust license and power to do whatever they pleased, and then accompany them in imagination and see whither desire will conduct them. We should then catch the just man in the very act or resorting to the same conduct as the unjust man because of the self-advantage which every creature in its nature pursues... And yet this is great proof one might argue that no one is just of his own will but only from constraint... for there is far more injustice than in justice.”1

I really understand and agree with what Glaucon is saying in his speech. I think that what he is saying is that the only reason people are just and abide by the rules that society sets, is because we there are consequences for our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Republic Study Guide

    • 2098 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Thrasymachus: Justice is defined as might makes right. The advantage of the strong. He is saying that it does not pay to be just. Just behavior works to the advantage of other people, not to the person who behaves justly. Thrasymachus assumes here that justice is the unnatural restraint on our natural desire to have more. Justice is a convention imposed on us, and it does not benefit us to adhere to it. The rational thing to do is ignore justice entirely.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The tyrant, who is also the most unjust man, is the least happy, but the aristocrat, the most just man, is the most happy, which shows that it pays to be just. In turn, Socrates comes up with his own definition of justice where, just like the ideal society, the just man has to balance the rational part of his soul, the spirited part of his soul, and the appetitive part of his soul. The problem, though, is that with this definition, the hoi polloi of America is…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This statement was in response to his participation in a non-violent campaign march in a town that still had many problems with segregation. He explains that he was asked there because of organizational ties, and that he was there because of injustice. He also brings up that the demonstrations were in response to a meeting they had previous with city leaders where promises were made and then broken. He goes on to explain the situation and the need for direct action so that it can lead to negotiation. He also brings up an idea that there is a difference in laws and how they are used. This difference is referred to as "just" and "unjust." Laws are unjust depending on if they restrict people unfairly, or if man uses them to restrict other people unfairly. He gives blame to the white moderate who is happy living with a negative peace and not willing to have the disorder to gain a positive peacefulness. He gives examples of injustices in the past, such as Christians being willing to face hungry lions versus submitting to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire. He says that society must, "protect the robbed and punish the robber." He also brings up the example that what Adolf Hitler did in Germany was legal at the time. Just because it was legal, didn't…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sioux Tribe Research Paper

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He follows this up by explaining that “If it is of such nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say, break the law.” This also clarifies that when the nature of the law is unjust, then following good conscience resulting in the breaking of the law is actually the duty of the people. According to Thoreau, for a law “to be strictly just, it must have the sanction and consent of the governed.” Strangely enough, Thoreau believes that a citizen’s duty is not to force others to eradicate the wrong by breaking the law, but only eradicate the wrong in one’s own life. Thoreau shows how remove injustice from one’s life in an influential line that reads as…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout On the Genealogy of Morals there is a recurrent theme of power, this can be understood in the context of an individuals desire to both harness and feel his power through the actions he performs. This paper will deal with the questions that arise out of this assumption of desire for power, such as why there is this desire for power, how this desire manifests itself in our actions and why being cruel give us the feeling of power.…

    • 5262 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 1 Assignment

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do. On the one hand the standard of right and wrong, on the other the chain of causes and effects, are fastened to their throne. They govern us in all we do, in all we say, in all we think: every effort we can make to throw off our subjection, will serve but to demonstrate and confirm it. (Ch. 1)…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    And the urge to stuff the face and fill the stomach to its full capacity…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patricia Cornwell, a famous writer, once said, that “I believe the root of all evil is the abuse of power”. To receive power in one’s life, they bring out strong emotions, such as fear or guilt to persuade the person to obey their commands. But, these people are simply exercising their power, and only have a relationship with them asymmetrically. The person will authority has the ability to limit the choices of another, and uses physically or psychologically pain only to pursue their goal. A person can rightfully deserve power, or obtain power by acting savagely. Either way, having authority in society can force people to act inhuman, and make people suffer dramatically. Similarly, in the article “Simulated prison in ‘71 Showed a Fine Line…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro: In this article, I first presented the Free Will argument. Then I showed how it fails by questioning the necessity of natural evils. After that, I defended my response against a likely rebuttal.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Blizzard

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Why does Laskin state that the horrible blizzard of 1888 “hit the most thickly settled sections of Nebraska and Dakota Territory at the worse possible moment”? Describe the dramatic change in temperatures that accompanied this storm. Why were the humble people of this raw region of the prairie prone to take risks, even in the face of devastating blizzard?…

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Walzer says this is a hard question to answer but he gives the answer that it is not ok to intervene. It was not to alter power but to bring supplies and food to people suffering. Walzer talks about leaders in a way saying “But they must also act effectively abroad when occasion demands it, and they must be able to judge the urgency of the demand in the appropriate moral and political terms” (Walzer, Pg. 68). He personally feels that the act to intervene is not ok but that small groups of soldiers should be sent were they are not expected.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From this example, we can conclude that it is in the nature of humans to seek power and authority, and many may go as far as to exploit those weaker than them, or disregard what is right and just to obtain power. One also may suggest that because people will always be power-driven, it is natural that history will repeat itself.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boethius Argument Analysis

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Specifically, the good wish to attain the good by engaging in virtuous activities compared to the evil whose actions are driven by their desires and impulses (Slavitt 112). Moreover, the virtuous acts are the proper means for those who are willing to achieve happiness since one can live a happy life only if he participates in activities of such kind. The main point here is that only virtuous people are able to do virtuous acts and hence they are the only individuals who can live a happy life. On the other hand, the wicked, as it is had been mentioned before choose to obtain the good by indulging in vicious acts which indicates that they are not able to reach their goal; their means are highly improper in order to achieve their object of will. Therefore, what is displayed here is that the good are powerful enough to attain happiness whereas the wicked are weak to do so. Specifically, the good are powerful and hence able to obtain the good since they have the mental strength to recognize that their fulfillment of their will, which is to achieve happiness is a result of virtuous actions. In contrast, the wicked have the false belief that their desires are sufficient and necessary to obtain the which constantly prevents them from attaining their…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche Beyond Evil

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In “Beyond Good and Evil”, Friedrich Nietzsche argues that “life is will to power” (p.68). In this paper, I will argue for this argument because I believe that people are controlled by elements of power exist in every aspect of life.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nature of Evil

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The nature of evil is a crucial yet difficult to understand concept. The conundrum of how good people can turn bad is one of the most prominent questions in today’s society. However, the word good is to be used lightly as following John Locke’s theory of Tabula Rasa; people aren’t born inherently good or evil thus their morality comes from experience and perception. The privileged like to think that they are all good people and there is a distinct line that separates them from everyone else. However it is not nearly so black and white. Almost everyone is neither wholly good nor evil but rather a product of their circumstance. Who is to say a privileged, successful student wouldn’t flourish in a life of crime they been born into it? I will attempt to explore how good people can “cross over” and do evil things. To describe this conundrum, physiologist Philip Zimbardo uses the term “the Lucifer effect”. I think that three core root things that cause “good” people to commit evil are blind obedience to authority, the bystander effect and desire for power.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays