Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Physician Assisted Suicide
"8 Main Pros and Cons of Legalizing Physician Assisted Suicide." ConnectUS. ConnectUS, 06 Aug. 2015. Web. 18 Oct. 2016. According to this article, physician-assisted suicide is also known as the Death with Dignity act. Only five states support this act and they are: Montana, Washington, Vermont, New Mexico, and Oregon. Physician-assisted suicide is not euthanasia because talking the lethal pill is solely up to the patient. There are many pros to physician-assisted suicide. It allows people to reserve their right to die with dignity, the patient can choose their treatment type, it talks away guilt and burden on families, and some struggling people lose their right to live and they should be supported. Some cons are that terminally ill patients
…show more content…
It starts by talking about our society’s confusion with liberty and how it affects the political decisions that are made. There are a number of people in society living in agonizing pain with no relief in sight an no possibility or access to physician assisted death. A powerful quote that stood out is “There is harm associated with loosening restrictions, but there is also harm associated with keeping them in place” and I find that this helps sum up the debate. There were people arguing for physician-assisted suicide by using the reasons that it gives people a pain free death full of dignity. While the counter argument adds that there is no evidence that lethal prescriptions will not be abused. It is required for physician-assisted suicide to happen that a person’s illness be terminal. There are also legal rules that distinguish passive and active measures that can be used. Passive is when the person simply refuses care, but active is when something is put in place to start the dying …show more content…
The article is a personal account from a mother about her daughter having terminal brain cancer. Brittany, the patient, had a financially stable family that provided her with the best medical care, including a home where she could end her life when she was ready. This article really hits on the financial aspect of why some people opt for physician assisted suicide. Brittany argues that she cannot be told what she has to do with her body and that she needs to be in control, which is why she eventually will opt for a physician assisted death when she starts
It starts by talking about our society’s confusion with liberty and how it affects the political decisions that are made. There are a number of people in society living in agonizing pain with no relief in sight an no possibility or access to physician assisted death. A powerful quote that stood out is “There is harm associated with loosening restrictions, but there is also harm associated with keeping them in place” and I find that this helps sum up the debate. There were people arguing for physician-assisted suicide by using the reasons that it gives people a pain free death full of dignity. While the counter argument adds that there is no evidence that lethal prescriptions will not be abused. It is required for physician-assisted suicide to happen that a person’s illness be terminal. There are also legal rules that distinguish passive and active measures that can be used. Passive is when the person simply refuses care, but active is when something is put in place to start the dying …show more content…
The article is a personal account from a mother about her daughter having terminal brain cancer. Brittany, the patient, had a financially stable family that provided her with the best medical care, including a home where she could end her life when she was ready. This article really hits on the financial aspect of why some people opt for physician assisted suicide. Brittany argues that she cannot be told what she has to do with her body and that she needs to be in control, which is why she eventually will opt for a physician assisted death when she starts