Preview

Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
760 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality
"When I access the internet I have certain expectations, as do most internet users. These expectations include equal access to any website I want to visit. Net neutrality makes this possible. If net neutrality is taken away the internet would become a closed-down network where cable and phone companies decide which websites, content or applications run properly on your device.
Net neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers should not discriminate against information being sent over the Internet and must treat all data packets equally regardless of source, type or content. Without net neutrality internet service providers would be allowed to limit programs or services the user can access, meaning they control what you’re allowed
…show more content…
If Internet providers suddenly have the power to speed up content they own or slow down content owned by rivals, then they will want to own as much content as possible.
""Without net neutrality, network providers can block or slow down access to sites they don't like. They can also determine what services and equipment users can access, dictate whether users are allowed to visit popular chat rooms or play popular games and assign higher fees for popular downloads."" (aclu.org, 2006)
Net neutrality has played a huge role in our society thus far. It allowed for websites like facebook to expand to where it is today. Under the new rules Internet providers could block websites they don't like.Without internet freedom the internet wouldn’t really be the internet anymore. Small businesses and minority groups would no longer have equal representation on the internet, which would allow bigger businesses to make all the profit and for leave minority voices unheard.
Another concern for many people is the effect this would have on the education system. In almost every classroom technology has become a major tool in aiding students. With net neutrality laws in place companies couldn’t block access to
…show more content…
Chairman Pai has made it his personal mission to make the internet a place of profit for those who are already rich and an extra expense for those who are struggling to keep a roof over their heads. Ajit Pai stated that “ there is a study by a highly respected economist that says that among the top 12 Internet service providers in terms of size, investment is down by 5.6 percent, or several billion dollars, over the last two years. And amongst smaller providers as well, just literally this week, 22 Internet service providers with 1,000 customers or less told us that these Title II regulations have kept them from getting the financing that they need to build out their networks. And, as they put it, these net neutrality regulations hang like a black cloud over our businesses. And so what we’re trying to do going forward is figure out a way that we can preserve that free and open Internet that consumers want and need and preserve that incentive to invest in the network that will ultimately benefit even more consumers going forward.” Chairman Pai believes that consumers will benefit from paying more to access what is already free. His motivation to repeal net neutrality is increasing the growth of the already rich internet providers, while the rest of us

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Lin Ray, net neutrality means no bit of information should be prioritized over another (“VCU Blog”, 2014). The origin of information doesn’t matter. Due to net neutrality, there are no restrictions on the internet currently. In other words, we can have free communication. The entire source of the internet is freely available for normal web users. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The net neutrality debate is examined by first being placed in current day context, followed by an examination of both the affirmative and negative arguments. Focus is placed on defining net neutrality, and analyzing the role market competition plays in ensuring net neutrality. Possible impacts on future innovations involving the internet and its openness are also considered. Based on these examinations, possible government policies and actions that can be implemented are recommended.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Abolishing Net Neutrality Was a Bad Idea With the recent abolishment of net neutrality, an enormous discourse has risen about the legality and ethics of the abolishment of the Obama-era law. Although many argue that net neutrality is not useful for the United States, I think that net neutrality is needed in the interest of citizens. It preserves the internet as a public good and brings important economic benefits. While the opponents of net neutrality argue that the abolishing it will help the economy by reducing investment, I contend that preserving net neutrality allows the internet to be useful to more people and reduces the government’s over-controlling grip over us.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the recent expansions in the availability of technology, the ability to access information has become increasingly more common. This ability to search for information and view content through the internet is currently protected in the United States under a set of laws that are commonly referred to as Net Neutrality regulations. Although many people are unaware of what the concept of net neutrality is, it is understood that the results of any change to current internet regulations would affect have long-lasting effects on all internet users. “Net Neutrality” is a concept that was defined and popularized by Tim Wu, a legal scholar and net neutrality advocate, as being, “the idea that any network traffic… can move from one place to any other place without discrimination” (Lohr 1). Recently, this equal access to content has come under attack by certain groups that would stand to profit from the removal of current net neutrality regulations, such as internet service providers…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality Rules

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On February 26, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission passed the Title II Net Neutrality rules. These rules will be enforced by the FCC and will protect the American people when it comes to the use of the Internet. Some people say that this is a major part of history because of the way the Internet has changed and enriched lifestyles. Research suggests that Net Neutrality will benefit all Internet users because it protects consumers against blocking of content, prevents throttling of all traffic, prevents favoritism to certain interests, and insures the customer's safety from prioritizing any specific content or traffic. These rules apply to all fixed and wireless internet providers in the United States, and Net Neutrality and its…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Net Neutrality is a topic of debate and confusion in the United States. It draws supporters as diverse as the Christian Coalition and moveon.org, pits traditional telecommunications companies like Verizon and Comcast against Internet giants such as Yahoo! and Google, and gives politicians yet another platform to raise an ongoing liberal-conservative debate over government regulation. So what is all this talk about? Philosophically, Net Neutrality is an ethical framework to govern access to the Internet. It advocates no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed. In 2005, the FCC embedded these principles into its policy with an objective to “encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet” (Policy Statement). This statement and proposed additional legislation is the source of continued controversy today. Fundamentally, the debate is grounded in opinions of necessity of Internet regulations and the repercussions of action or inaction. This paper will attempt to provide a context for the debate, a better understanding of the regulation and the possible implications, and a summary of the differing views.…

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    But, what the FCC isn’t taking into account is the millions of internet users that want to keep internet neutrality. With net neutrality maintained, users of the internet will have equal access to the internet, which will increase their total…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to:1. become familiar with Net Neutrality.2. identify the impact of Net Neutrality on your daily life and use of the Internet.3. identify why people are for it and others oppose it.4. formulate your own opinion about Net Neutrality.Directions: Follow the step-by-step instructions and use Microsoft Word to respond to the questions below. Your response to questions one, two, and three should collectively be no less than 200 words (The word count excludes the text for the questions). All answers must be original – NO copy and pasting from websites! Also, you must also include in-text citations and cite any sources on a reference page using proper MLA or APA format.Complete a word count and post it on the bottom of the document. Be sure to indicate your name and date at the top of the document.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A writer for Wired, a technology focused magazine and website, even states, “Net neutrality is a dead man walking. The execution date isn’t set, but it could be days, or months (at best)” (Ammori). This is assumed quite a bit in part because the court systems that struck down the original FCC rules seems to be heavily in favor of corporations over the public interest. It also doesn’t help that ISPs are currently offering a false compromise with the FCC. The current rules that the FCC is voting on would allow the FCC to tell ISPs that they are not allowed to block sites entire for no reason, but they would be allowed to throttle any website for any reason of their choosing. This is very worrying, because as Marvin Ammori put it, “Once the court voids the nondiscrimination rule, AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast will be able to deliver some sites and services more quickly and reliably than others for any reason. Whim. Envy. Ignorance. Competition. Vengeance. Whatever. Or, no reason at all.” If our internet is controlled by the decisions of corporations we are in for a bleak future. Websites like Wikipedia, which provide a wealth of free information, would have trouble being able to provide their services to the public for free as they would be facing a set of fees assessed by each ISP based off of the amount of users that access their website. Free sites that share information with people…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The basic principle of net neutrality is that ISPs have to treat their customers equally, ISPs stand for internet service providers. Some positive things about net neutrality are that it’s free and open to all and it shouldn't block or discriminate against any content, like how phone company should not decide who you want to call. Violation of net neutrality occurs when someone begins discriminating, for instance, if the FCC fails to defend net neutrality, it’s only a matter of time before we have to pay a premium to access websites that were once free and open to the public. And that is how corrupted government around the world have censored the internet in their country just like how they censor a newspaper. A world without net neutrality…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Net neutrality is what gives consumers the right to have access to the internet with no extra charge. It works by protecting costumers from being overcharged or being denied full access to what the costumer rightfully paid for. Without net neutrality, Internet users would have limited access to the internet while paying more for services and may only be able to see what is allowed to be seen, it will also slow down the internet service making it less accessible. the only ones benefiting from the repeal of net neutrality would be the internet providers, who would be receiving extra money from consumers and the small companies that want to be advertised. Net neutrality is important for everyone.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine living in a world with internet restrictions. What is the problem with congress removing net neutrality if company’s say they will not block or slow down access to content on the internet? On the one hand, supporters of net neutrality argue that only large companies would be able to afford the faster internet speeds. Thus, reducing traffic to smaller businesses because of throttling and that content control could lead to content or site discrimination. On the other hand, opponents contend that companies will not throttle speeds for customers paying less or discriminate against content.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What problems would arise from the destruction of these net neutrality rules? For starters, a main issue would be the increasing price to the consumers. Allowing internet providers to limit our internet experience could mean that those options could only become available upon a higher price being paid to those internet providers. "Levying higher costs for companies to access Internet fast lanes could lead to higher charges to consumers (A Free and Open Internet System Fosters Technological Growth and Innovation). " For example, a series of either apps or websites could be blocked but if you paid an extra, they would become available.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays