Opponents of concealed carry argue that increased gun ownership leads to more gun crime and unintended gun injuries. They contend that concealed handguns increase the chances of arguments becoming lethal, and that society would be safer with fewer guns on the street, not more. Dr. John Lott, published More Guns, Less Crime which concluded that the "shall-issue" laws linked with a reduction in violent crimes in 1988. Lott argued that if states that did not permit concealed handguns in 1992 had permitted them in 1977, 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults, and 12,000 robberies would have been prevented between 1977 and…
Over the past couple months, we have been hearing devastating news reports. School shootings, movie theater massacres, church shootings, there has been numerous reports of these tragic events. Many people believe that guns are the problem, but in reality it’s the people that need to think before they act. It’s true what they say, “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” the more people with guns in the street, the safer it can be. There have been many states that have passed laws that let people openly carry guns, and Oregon is considering passing it as well. Oregon should allow law abiding citizens to carry guns openly. There have been many other states that has proven the open carry law works and is beneficial. Passing the open carry…
In her essay “Why Handguns Must Be Outlawed,” Nan Desuka brings for the issue whether handguns should be outlawed except to police and other service units. I disagree with Desuka’s position on banning handguns. This essay offers arguments why they should be banned without offering realistic solutions to the problems Desuka states in owning handguns. Retaining legalized handguns affects all of us. It’s essential to Collectors and sportsmen, and vital to all our safety. I do not believe that banning handguns will overall decrease violent crimes or the deaths due to violent crimes.…
Do you think it is appropriate whether people should own a handgun or not? The article “The Accessibility of Guns Protects Lives” by David M. Huntwork and “The Accessibility of Guns Lead to Gun Crime” by Alan M. Ruben both have significant perspectives regarding if it is secure or hazardous to own a firearm. There can be a debate of whether guns can protect our lives or can lead to gun crimes.…
Concealed carry has been around since the beggining of America. It is our second amendment right to carry a concealed weapon in the public. In second amendment it states, “a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear arms should not be fringed” (B). That means that people should have the right to have a weapon and defend themselves. That was obviously put into place a long time ago, but more recently they changed it a little bit. In the 2012 court case “moore vs. madigan” ruled that, “ The second amendment right to bear arms must be interpreted to include a right to have a concealed carry in public, to have it ready for use, and to have it for self defence” (B). That debate…
In today’s time, open carry is discussed by both politicians and the common man, but should it be allowed? Would open carry add to the danger that is already present in society today, or would it help in reducing crime and many other dangers that exist today? While both sides of this argument can be valid, open carry should be considered because of the following: it helps to reduce crime, it will help common people from getting in trouble because of what they are carrying, and it helps protect police officers, but first what is open carry?…
This article is about the main issue of gun control, and how it is enough. The article mainly focuses on two sides. The first side is that everybody should have guns from criminals to citizens. The other side is how nobody should have guns, besides law enforcement. First, this piece will discuss the pros and cons of how everybody should have guns. Then we will go on to identify some of the pros and cons about how nobody should have guns, bedsides law enforcement, and then conclude with my final opinion about the gun control issue.…
Among every one of them, in any case, wrangle over weapon control has been common for so long, it is something numerous individuals can without much of a stretch set their sights on. It is an issue everyone should have a feeling on, as it is immeasurably essential, possibly debilitating, and very present in advanced society. Numerous locate the insignificant idea of weapon control intrusive to their sacred rights while others see an absence of firearm control to be astonishingly unsafe. An author describes, “Organizations like Gun Owners of America and Guns Save Lives also subscribe to the belief (a gun lobby article of faith) that society would benefit if every American carried a concealed handgun all the time” (Greif par. 4). Assurance of oneself and their rights could conceivably be more critical than many lives lost possibly because of genuinely unhindered firearm possession. The simple inquiry would convey numerous to ear-shattering open deliberation, and all things considered. Shouts of sacred disregard and of humanistic laziness would likely be heard miles away. This open deliberation would be particularly on target, however, as there are numerous substantial focuses from either side or it is a subject that must be thoroughly considered…
As we view the news and read newspaper articles, there continues to be ongoing stories and articles of school and workplace shootings and hostile environments. It appears that individuals of society are even lashing out at the innocent, when things are not done as they may see fit. For example Sandy Hook shooting took the lives of many innocent children, who victims of a troubled individual. Due to the excessive murders that are being committed in schools and workplaces, at this time, the author still agrees that citizens should not be allowed to carry concealed weapons to schools, or the workplace.…
Both Burnett and Dickerson have valid statements with many supporting facts. Burnett’s stance on allowing concealed weapons is based on his beliefs that gun free zones are unsafe, concealed weapons are crucial for protection, and students have a right to defend themselves. Burnette argues…
It has often been seen throughout history that when the United States government impedes on the rights of civilians, people tend to feel as though they are being stripped of their basic rights to life, liberty, and property. These basic rights are inalienable by law, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the government must tread lightly when making decisions in correspondence to them. In recent years laws and bills have been passed by legislation in regards to gun control with the intent of making the U.S. a safer place for all citizens who reside within its borders. However, the right to bear arms is protected by the second amendment and is highly favored by many American citizens making it a highly controversial topic. In the…
The Second Amendment has brought up major arguments in American politics ever since 1876. Was it meant to insure that people in general have arms for personal safety, or was it to insure arms for the military service only? Gun control in America has its pros and cons, but the nation needs to decide which way the government goes on this topic because more school shootings will occur and terrorists can still get there hands on them.…
Many Americans today openly carry their guns with them in public. There are different reasons why some people do open-carry, but one of the main reasons is for self protection. America has had many gun laws passed in the past years, making it more strict. With all of the shootings going on, and terroristic threats, more people have been buying guns for their own protection. People never know when a shooting could happen, and that is a scary thought to many Americans across the nation.…
There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm then good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. [C]itizens in Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas are asking their state legislatures for the ability to defend themselves against violent criminal attack regardless of where the attack takes place”(Swasey 175).…
This essay has one purpose. I intend to show my reader that as important as it is to keep guns out of the wrong hands, it’s impossible to be 100% sure as to who’s hands are the wrong hands. In all of my 35 years on earth I have not killed anyone with a firearm. I don’t believe that means that I should own one either. Using me as an example is the best way to display my unbiased opinion. As Americans once certain criteria has been met, the 2nd amendment of the constitution protects our right to bear arms. Americans take this right very seriously and exercise it religiously. According to the more than 10,000 people killed in America by firearms yearly, many obviously don’t practice this right responsibly.…