One of the problems Rumpology has is the lack of knowledge or supporting data presented by its supporters. The most “prominent” rumpologist in America, Jackie Stallone, admits that when looking at her qualifications, she only has a chemistry background, no anatomy or physiology that many would claim to be more beneficial to stance (Carroll, 2011). Also, upon looking for the connection of this practice to the ancient world, the single finding of such history is Mrs. Stallone’s testimony and when asked where she found this information, she refusedto reveal her …show more content…
Pseudosciences are known for only providing evidence in support of, instead of also disproving the opposition’s claims. Rumpology follows that exact “business model”, nowhere on Mrs. Stallone’s website nor any of the other articles in favor of Rumpology, are the concerns of the opposition addressed. Secondly, Rumpology is untestable and can’t be replicated. The field only holds about two prominent rumpologist, as mentioned before, Jackie Stallone, and Sam Amos, the single rumpologist in the UK. Due to the scarcity of rumpologist, there is no uniform procedure for telling someone’s future from the markings of their butt, even though both rumpologists offer courses in learning rumpology with no evidence of agreeing on how it should be taught. If you had a rump report done by Mrs. Stallone it is more than likely that some of the “future telling” aspects of her report would be different than Mrs. Amos’