Preview

Pros And Cons Of Sentencing

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Sentencing
Arguments at sentencing
May file appeals
Counsel defendant and family about civil matters if applies.

Should a defendant be found guilty an defense counsels job continues as referenced in this slide. If found guilty a defense counsel will present arguments at sentencing to persuade a lighter sentence, or mistakes, although this will not change a guilty verdict, it does however provide the defense and the defendant the opportunity to address the court. It does also allow the prosecution and the victims the right to also address the court to persuade the judge for a stepper sentence. The next step after sentencing is appeals, in most cases of murder a defendant sentenced to life will get with is defense counsel to file appeals, as in the Hettrick
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Limited Jurisdiction Court Case Summary
    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Limited Jurisdiction Court Case Summary

    Trial – If the defendant pleads not guilty, a trial is held The judge at the defendant’s request. Sentencing – If the defendant is found guilty, the court imposes the appropriate punishment. Next is called a Appeals – from decisions of limited jurisdiction courts go to superior court, appeal may be heard as a new trial.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of The Sentencing Project
    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of The Sentencing Project

    Dozens of writers, reformists and activists have already narrated the story of America's harrowing prison epidemic spread wide by the politics of corporate greed and fueled daily by scapegoating the poor and vulnerable. With nearly twenty years experience in public policy development, criminal justice reform, and promoting alternatives to confinement, now comes Marc Mauer, Assistant Director of The Sentencing Project, a national organization based in Washington, D.C. which advocates for substantial changes in our ways of punishing criminal…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences
    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing policy in federal courts. In 1980 they reformed the federal sentencing. The intent was to provide determinate sentencing. Determinate sentencing is a fixed period of incarceration without the possibility of parole, but time served can be reduced by accumulating good time. “Coinciding with the development of determinate sentencing has been the development of sentencing guidelines to control and structure the process and make it more rational. Guidelines are usually based on the seriousness of a crime and the background of an offender: The more serious the crime and the more extensive the offender’s criminal background, the longer the prison term recommended by the guidelines.” (Segel & Senna 2006). These guidelines were designed to eliminate judicial discretion and get tough on crime.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pros And Cons
    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pros And Cons

    Rough Draft Fifty-five years without possibility of parole. That is what Weldon Angelos is facing for selling a total of $350 worth of marijuana, and carrying a firearm; even though, he has no criminal history and never fired the gun. This is all due to laws called mandatory minimum sentences (MMS); which are sentences that are determined by the weight of the drugs or the presence of a firearm during a felony offense. They are called mandatory because judges are forced to impose these sentences based solely on the amount of drug present without any leniency. The mandatory minimum prison sentences are a controversial way to fight the “War on Drugs” that have a conflicted history and have drastically increased prison populations and costs.…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Capital Punishment
    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Capital Punishment

    The debate over whether or not capital punishment should be used has gone on for thousands of years. Although the method of capital punishment has changed the idea of it has not. Capital punishment will always have its disadvantages and its advantages. There has always been an intense debate among the people regarding the constitutionality of capital punishment. In my opinion, capital punishment should only be used in harsh cases that the convicted person is proven guilty in.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Sentencing
    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Sentencing

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parole Pros And Cons
    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page

    Parole Pros And Cons

    Parole is a stage in the system that more people hope they get while in jail. Parole is the stepping stone to prove that the criminals are capable of being back into society after being in jail. This gives the criminals the opportunity to prove they learned their lessons and can handle life on their own. With parole, we are capable of keeping track of certain criminals after being released, but allowing them to grow back into the real world without any help.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing The State And Federal Objectives Of Sentencing
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing The State And Federal Objectives Of Sentencing

    2. Without parole, then there are fewer ways in which to hold the inmates accountable for their misconduct and to make them head to discipline, so that they have to attempt at trying to have a good record before going in front of the parole board. 3.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Punishment
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Punishment

    As previously mentioned, if the punishment is not harsh enough the result is repeated offense. If a criminal relishes in committing a crime and the court system does not properly punish them for it, then they actually have no reason not to repeat the crime over again. The National Institute of Justice, part of the U.S department of Justice, studied how likely criminals are to relapse after being released, claiming that “Within five years of release, about three-quarters (76.6 percent) of released prisoners were rearrested” (Durose, Cooper, and Howard). This statistic proves that there is a significant chance that a criminal will indeed carry out the same action as before. The most significant way that an offender is punished is through what…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Standards Analysis Paper
    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Courtroom Standards Analysis Paper

    The deal with the judge in the same manner as the rest of the people involved in the court room by showing the upmost respect and following the rules that are enforced by the judge. The interaction with the prosecution can at times be a bumpy ride due to the fact the prosecution will do what is necessary and at times can slip away from playing by the rules. The defense will find holes in the prosecution and provide the information to their client. At times some of the actions can lead to a person who may be proven guilty the chance to walk due to the fact of the rights being broken. The defense does what is best for the client with the information provided and the ability to enforce that their client is being treated to a fair trial.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing
    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing

    There are many different argument both for and against mandatory minimum drug sentencing. However there are more arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing then there are for the support of the mandatory sentencing. One of the biggest arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing is that it was originally intended to target the higher level drug dealers but the majority of the cases have only been low level drug dealers. One of the other arguments is that will cause the jail systems to become overcrowded and that if is unfair.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal
    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing Proposal

    The last stage of a criminal trial is known as sentencing. During sentencing the convening authority over the criminal court proceedings makes a determination of how the guilty party should be punished. Prior to that determination being made both the defense attorneys and prosecutors may make their arguments as to why or why not the defendant should be punished to the fullest of the law. The judge taking these arguments into consideration makes his or her decision on what type sentence to hand down. While the main goal is to punish those that are found guilty there are five sentencing rationales in use in the American criminal justice system. These rationales are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, restoration, and incapacitation. In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the judge will use the rationales of rehabilitation and incapacitation. The defense and prosecutors will make their arguments and propose the type of sentence Mr. Dents should receive which in turn will protect him and society.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fair Sentencing Act Pros And Cons
    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fair Sentencing Act Pros And Cons

    The Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) of 2010 (Public Law 111-220) was an act by Congress, and became law on August 3, 2010 ( ). The FSA intent is to reduce the gap between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to initiate federal criminal penalties from a 100:1 weight ratio to an 18:1 weight ratio. The FSA also eliminates the five-year mandatory minimum sentence for the possession of crack cocaine (Reid 2012).…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Magistrates Court Essay
    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Magistrates Court Essay

    Your solicitor can explain what exactly happens in the court. The judge and court staff will also give instructions about the trial.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics