Pros- The electoral College allows each states vote to count, instead of focusing only on states with larger populations. …show more content…
Cons- In a fair democracy, everyone’s vote should count equally, but the Electoral College violates this principle by making sure that some people’s vote are more equal than others.
“Under our admittedly complex and convoluted system, a single vote for president in the state of Wyoming, for instance, counts for more than a single vote in California. Tiny Wyoming has an inflated number of electoral votes -- three-- because every state is awarded a minimum of three. California, with a population of over fofty times as large as Wyoming, has only a little more than eight times as many electoral votes. This means that a vote in Wyoming counts about three times more than a vote in California” (Bates,
2004).
One proposal to change how the Electoral College works is the National Popular Vote bill. This would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular vote in the entire United States, while avoiding outcomes such as the 2000 election where George W. Bush became the next president, even though Al Gore won the popular vote. John Koza, who founded the National Popular Vote project, hopes to force presidential candidates to campaign in all fifty states, rather than them spending all of their time and money in only fifteen states. (Loeb, 2011)
References
(2008, November 3). Electoral College 101. New York Times Upfront, 141(5), 6-7.
Bates, N. (2004, October 26). What are the arguments made in favor – and against – the Electoral College? History News Network. Retrieved from http://hnn.us/articles/8163.html
Levin-Waldman, O. M. (2012). American government. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc
Loeb, M. (2011, August 9). California votes to bypass Electoral College. National Journal.