Preview

Proven Guilty: Building Block In Our Adversarial System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Proven Guilty: Building Block In Our Adversarial System
Due process stands behind the words ‘innocent until proven guilty’ which is a building block in our adversarial system. Herbert Packer theorised the two models of ‘due process’ and ‘crime control’ to describe the competing values in our criminal justice system. Due process can be described as “at least as much to protect the factually innocent as it is to convict the factually guilty” (Henry, S. and Einstadter, W.J., 2006.,p.61) whereas crime control protects the victim with the insurance of justice being served. On the surface, our system claims to uphold the right to due process, however, when delving deeper into aspects such as pre-trial procedures and jury trials, holes arise.

There are many stages between arrest and trial, which are
…show more content…
If the defendant doesn’t meet the criteria required for bail and thus denied it, does this not challenge the standard of proof and consequently not adhere to due process values? It can be argued further that if bail is granted, are we taking away the due …show more content…
Jeremy Wright told the House of Commons that 132,000 offences were committed by those when on bail in 2012 (Davies, M., Croall, H. and Tyrer, J., 2015) If bail isn’t granted, and the defendant is remanded in custody, they can experience certain privileges such as having a ‘taste’ for prison which can perhaps act as a mitigating factor in their trial. In general, bail and remands in custody are within due process.The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) Code C is the Code of Practice for the detention, treatment and questioning of persons by police officers. In this code, due process is served in a variety of ways such the ‘appropriate adult’ for juvenile suspects where an adult is assigned to a child to essentially act as a substitute parent(1.7 a), mentally and physically vulnerable persons are taken into consideration(1.7 b), suspects are even entitled to a copy of the Code to review their rights (1.8 b) Another important aspect of pre-trial procedures would be the Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing (PTPH) which occurs for Crown Court trials and is aimed at reducing the need for multiple hearings. The indictment will be read to the defendant and they will hence be asked if they plead guilty or not guilty. If plead not guilty, further organisation will be set for the trial and if plead guilty, the sentence will decided there (Justice Gov, 2015) Guilty

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Later on, during that time the court went to the state and collected the amount of numbers that were involved protection of the parolees rights. This is why in the case Morrissey v Brewer, Morrissey was being viewed by the Supreme Court which gave him the parole revocation process that had two types of process, the first process was the arrest of the parolee and a preliminary hearing and the second process was the revocation.(Abadinsky,Howard.198) The Supreme Court did make some recommendations dealing with the due process for the revocation hearing which included written notice for the parolees, disclosures to the parolee of evidence against the person, opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, neutral and detached by hearing the lawyers, and a written statement that the evidence relied on or against the reason for revoking parole.(Abadinsky,Howard.199) Also, the Supreme Court had stated that during a revocation hearing the parolee must have an opportunity to be heard and to show if the person that did not violate the conditions or had situations in justification were suggested by the violation without warrant revocation at that time. The revocation hearing must be presented within a reasonable time…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morrissey's Parole Case

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page

    Furthermore, the parolee is still in custody and being on parole allowed the parolee to serve their sentence outside the prison. In addition, Morrissey has violated numerous parole violations. Then the court stating that the parolee should have a informal hearing to explain if the violations are correct and if not their will be an…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Where there is sufficient evidence against the suspect, the suspect is issued with an indictment, and is subject to immediate arrest by security personnel as they await a trial. During the trial a verdict is made either by the judge or a grand jury to determine whether the suspect is guilty of crime or not. If guilty, the necessary legal sentencing and/or fines are stated; it could be imprisonment or monetary fines.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.’…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, there are two main competing models of justice, the Due Process Model, and the Crime Control Method. The Due Process Model (DPM) is known as obstacle course justice with an ideology that relies on the formal structure of the law and legal guilt. The DPM’s primary goals are to protect the due process rights of the accused and limiting the powers of the state. It runs completely with an underlying assumption of innocence, making it not so effective at all times. The Crime Control Method (CCM), on the other hand is known as assembly line justice. It has an ideology that centers on efficiency and effectiveness of the system and factual guilt. The CCM’s primary goals are to protect society from crime and to control the behavior of the community. This process uses and informal fact finding process through the police and prosecutors. Also contrary to the DPM the CCM operates under a presumption of guilt. The CCM of justice is focused on detaining the accused and securing convictions, making it very effective in preventing crime however somehow you have to step on some toes. These two models and methods occur all the time in the criminal justice system we see today, and there is much controversy behind which process should dominate. In 1984 Sherman and Berk published their overall case study on “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault”. This study supported a more CCM ideology of justice. However in 1988 Binder and Meeker published an article critiquing the methods and conclusions of the original study, offering a counterpoint.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court, Trials, and Sentencing: Due Process is a documentary explaining the court system within the criminal justice system. The American legal system is adversarial with two parties, the defense and the prosecution, working to prove to the jury their side is right. Overall the process of going through the court system is long and drawn out in order to make sure the person is guilty. From the initial charging to sentencing and appealing, there are a lot of steps the defendant needs to go through. This can be beneficial to the accused because it makes sure that they are guilty, but it also puts a burden on the community because of the time and money that needs to be spent on each individual case.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One is the crime-control model, which is a perception that stresses the arrest and the conviction of a criminal offender. The other common model is the due process model, which is a criminal justice perspective that stresses individual rights at all stages of justice system processing. This process is intended to make sure that innocent people are not convicted of crimes. This is an important part of the justice system in America. Facts are individually and carefully considered for each case to be determined. The police is required to state the suspect’s rights during arrest, questioning, and handling. It also requires that the prosecutors and judges, during a trial and the presentation of any evidence, must recognize the constitutional…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Due process should be the sole basis of the criminal justice system because it shows the true meaning of innocent until proven guilty in our society today. This “method or process” was created to help wing out those who are willing to change their ways and live right and enjoy the freedoms that we do receive. There are people who do make mistakes but some don’t deserve to be punished till death.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role the jury trial plays in criminal cases is fundamental to the American scheme of justice.1 The right to a jury trial is rooted in our legal tradition2 and is articulated in the U.S. Constitution.3 This protection extends back to British common law, and serves as a check against government oppression by ensuring that a defendant’s fate lies in the hands of a jury of ordinary citizens rather than the government’s prosecutor or judge.4 Coupled with the presumption of innocence, the right to a jury trial serves as a “cornerstone of Anglo-Saxon justice”5 that limits potential government tyranny. At the heart of jury trial protections and the presumption of innocence lies the concern that it is better to let a guilty man go free than to convict an innocent man.6…

    • 8780 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also setting in jail for months waiting on your trial is a clear violation of due process. To me, going to jail before you have been tried and convicted, innocent or guilty, is absurd. To be put in prison you need to have a trial by jury and to be found guilty without a reasonable…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Baill

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    151). The passing of the Bail reform Act of 1966 assumed that all individuals, regardless of their economic status, must not be detained without reason while waiting to answer their accused charges. The more recent passing of the Bail Reform Act of 1984 primarily affected the discretion of judges, providing them with more initiative in releasing and setting bail for defendants. Also under this act, judges are obligated to hold one or more meetings evaluating the threat posed by the accused person, providing a more thorough analysis of the…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is the courts duty to protect communities from wrongdoers while at the same time protecting the public, victims, as well as the accused offender’s Constitutional rights. Today crime control is important to the judicial system as well as the general public, however, it is imperative to remember that Due Process is essential to holding up a person’s Constitutional Rights (How Criminal Cases…n.d.).…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due Process Model

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due process advocates argue that the purpose of any civilized society is to secure rights and freedoms for each of its citizens-including the criminally accused (Schmallenger, 2003, p.18). The nature of individual rights is to ensure each individual receives protection as stated by the Bill of Rights. As the highest law of the land, the Bill of Rights must be enforced. Without these rights, Americans might be reduced to governmental automatons, and forced back into the dark ages of segregation. Persons, not yet convicted of crimes, should retain their rights. After all, we are an "innocent until proven guilty" society.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The phrase "innocent until proven guilty" has been quoted for many years. In our society, we have labeled the accused person either guilty or not guilty without giving that person or persons their rith of due process. Webster's New World College Dictionary Fourth Edition says: "Due Process is the course of legal proceedings established by the legal system of a nation or state to protect individual rights and liberties." Due Process will allow an accused person time to go through the court proceeding, in hope of proving his or her innocence or guilt. Due Process will give the individuals who have been accused of a crime the right to a fair and public trial, the right to be at the trial, the rith to an impartial jury, and the right to be heard.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law of criminal procedure limits and controls how the criminal justice system operates by ensuring that the basic rights of citizens, granted in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights, are not violated while in the custody of the criminal justice system. When processing a suspect, the federal and state governments must take into consideration the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments, as well as the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. These amendments pertain to the common etiquettes the criminal justice system must follow when handling all suspects accused of criminal…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays