Psy 270 Week 1 Critical Thinking Case

1) We both know that the courts are not involved in a negotion for buy out. It's between the clients, my client agreed to amount higher than he feels the house is valued to move higher thean he feels the house is valued to move on with this divorce. Since now finding out that Jacob, the youngest son, has dropped out of College there is no reason for him to keep the house. With this being said he will only agree to one of the following. A) As offerd before $125,000 buy out, witch would be amount agreed to 339,000 (House value after retailer costs). b) House appraise she gets half quily minus 1/2 reatliers fees. c) Houses will be sold and she will recieve half equity minus realitor fees. Jacob, the youngest son has been informed that he will
v) Pountoon boat was what your client wanted. It is confirmed as your Clients property or to be sold by her. My client sold the boat he wanted to give your client what she wanted. My client never wanted a poutoon boat vi) Your client is aware of transmission problems that soon becme appearent after purchasing truck. \\\ are wore out in third gear. It grinds going into that gear. She has been in the truck many times when it has accoured. Second I bought the truck used meaning it was not retail price. I paid $7300.00 plus tax almost three years ago. It didn't increase in value FMV $6500.00. vii) agreed viii) agreed ix) agreed x) I sold my 1970 mach 1 Mustand running and driving for $6500 and bought cooper for $5000.00 inclosed are the two things bought for the car amounting in $800.00 cooper is my clients sole property. 12) Mr. Anderegg did sell jacobs civic hatch back. Your client knows that it was her sons vehicle. $500 was used for jacobs school books, emergency room visit and computer parts, however it's my sole responsibility to pay for our sons insurance and gas, but I belive your client is paying his phone bill. 5) What agreement on checking accounts. I feel we split the money. Is this not