psychological contract
In recent years, there exist many new types of economy in globalisation, and then it results in varying new types of job in which different job descriptions depending on different industries. More importantly, the role of employees is day by day appreciated as a core component in the development and the success of any organisational productivity and any company respectively. That is the reason why psychological contract needs to be invented in a new economy whilst loss of trade unions. Subsequently, this essay will not only clarify how the psychological contract is defined and how it is evaluated and applied in organisations in reality but also answer the question why a psychological contract is considered as so important in the management of the contemporary employment relationship.
By definition, psychological contract has been stated as “a set of unwritten reciprocal expectations between an individual employee and the organisation” (Schein, 1978:48) and “… the perceptions of the two parties, employee and employer, of what their mutual obligations are towards each other” (Guest and Conway, 2002:1). Also, another perspective has been defined as “The psychological contract, unlike expectations, entails a belief in what the employer is obliged to provide, based on perceived promises of reciprocal exchange” (Robinson and Rousseau, 1994, p.246). On the other hand, as for the nature of the employment relationship, Wilton (2011) referred this concept to “what is written or implied in contract of employment or the other explicit manifestations of the employment relationship” or subjected to “constant change”. Hence, psychological contract is considered as a meaningful concept and initial understanding need to be established at the beginning between employers and employees.
Broadly, the psychological contract is shaped by both individual factors (include age, gender, level of education and prior employment experience) and organisational factors (such as sector and
By definition, psychological contract has been stated as “a set of unwritten reciprocal expectations between an individual employee and the organisation” (Schein, 1978:48) and “… the perceptions of the two parties, employee and employer, of what their mutual obligations are towards each other” (Guest and Conway, 2002:1). Also, another perspective has been defined as “The psychological contract, unlike expectations, entails a belief in what the employer is obliged to provide, based on perceived promises of reciprocal exchange” (Robinson and Rousseau, 1994, p.246). On the other hand, as for the nature of the employment relationship, Wilton (2011) referred this concept to “what is written or implied in contract of employment or the other explicit manifestations of the employment relationship” or subjected to “constant change”. Hence, psychological contract is considered as a meaningful concept and initial understanding need to be established at the beginning between employers and employees.
Broadly, the psychological contract is shaped by both individual factors (include age, gender, level of education and prior employment experience) and organisational factors (such as sector and
References: Buchanan, D. A. and Huczynski, A. (1991) Organisational Behaviour: An Introductory Text (2nd edn), Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall. IDS (2012) A flexible future – Flexible working 2012, HR in Practice, accessed online 17/01/2013 at: https://ids.thomsonreuters.com/hr-in-practice/features-analysis/flexible-future-%E2%80%93-flexible-working-2012 . Guest, D. (2001) ‘Industrial Relations and human resource management’ in Storey, J. (ed.) Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, London: Thomson Learning. Guest, D Guest, D. and Conway, N. (1997) Employee Motivation and the Psychological Contract, London: IPD. Guest, D. and Conway, N. (2002) Communicating the psychological contract: An employer perspective, Human Resource Management Journal, 12(2):22-38. Harrison, R. (1997) Employee Development, London: IPD. McGregor, D Maslow, A. (1943) ‘A Theory of human motivation’, Psychological Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 370-96. Mason, D. (1995) Investors in people: A guide to achieving the standard, England: Technical Communications (Publishing) Ltd. Mead, R. (1994) Cross-Cultural management communication, England: Wiley. Narelle Hess, Denise M Poole, M. and Jenkins, G. (1996) Back to the line? A survey of managers’ attitudes to human resource management issues, London: The Institute of Management. Preston, D Robinson, S. L. and Rousseau, D. M. (1994) Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm, Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 15:245-59. Rousseau, D. M. and Parks, J. M. (1993) “The Contracts of Individuals and Organisations” in Cummings, L.L. and Straw, B. M. (Eds), Research in organisational Behaviour, Vol. 15, pp. 1-43. Schein, E. H. (1978) Career Dynamics: Matching Individual and Organisational Needs, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Vroom, V. H. (1964) Work and Motivation, New York: John Wiley. Wilton, N. (2011) An introduction to Human Resource Management, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.