Psychology and Work
Work Psychology
Understanding human behaviour in the workplace SECOND EDITION
John Arnold
Cary L. Cooper Ivan T. Robertson
CHAPTER 3
Work psychology: its origins, subjectmatter and research techniques
OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
~ Describe important features of the history of work psychology. ~ Specify the topics covered by work psychologists.
~ Describe the main elements of a psychological theory, and explain the links between those elements.
Discuss the relationship between work psychology and common sense.
~ Describe five methods of data collection used in research by work psychologists. ~ Describe the key features, advantages and disadvantages of four research designs used by work psychologists.
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter begins with a brief look at the roots and history of work psychology, including the Hawthorne studies and other key milestones. Attention then turns to modern work psychology: the topics it covers, the relationship between theory and practice, and professional affairs. The issue of whether work psychology is more useful than so-called common sense is examined. If it is to be useful, work psychology must be based on sound information and appropriate techniques. This chapter therefore concludes with an analysis of how work psychologists obtain information using research methods. The strengths and weaknesses of each method are illustrated with examples. By the end of the chapter the reader should know the topics that work psychology covers, and be able to describe and evaluate the research methods used by work psychologists.
3.2 THE ORIGINS OF WORK PSYCHOLOGY
Work psychology has at least two distinct roots. One resides in a pair of traditions that have often been termed 'fitting the man [sic] to the job ' (FMJ) and 'fitting the job to the man [sic] '
(FJM). The FMJ tradition manifests itself in employee selection, training and vocational guidance. These endeavours
Understanding human behaviour in the workplace SECOND EDITION
John Arnold
Cary L. Cooper Ivan T. Robertson
CHAPTER 3
Work psychology: its origins, subjectmatter and research techniques
OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
~ Describe important features of the history of work psychology. ~ Specify the topics covered by work psychologists.
~ Describe the main elements of a psychological theory, and explain the links between those elements.
Discuss the relationship between work psychology and common sense.
~ Describe five methods of data collection used in research by work psychologists. ~ Describe the key features, advantages and disadvantages of four research designs used by work psychologists.
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter begins with a brief look at the roots and history of work psychology, including the Hawthorne studies and other key milestones. Attention then turns to modern work psychology: the topics it covers, the relationship between theory and practice, and professional affairs. The issue of whether work psychology is more useful than so-called common sense is examined. If it is to be useful, work psychology must be based on sound information and appropriate techniques. This chapter therefore concludes with an analysis of how work psychologists obtain information using research methods. The strengths and weaknesses of each method are illustrated with examples. By the end of the chapter the reader should know the topics that work psychology covers, and be able to describe and evaluate the research methods used by work psychologists.
3.2 THE ORIGINS OF WORK PSYCHOLOGY
Work psychology has at least two distinct roots. One resides in a pair of traditions that have often been termed 'fitting the man [sic] to the job ' (FMJ) and 'fitting the job to the man [sic] '
(FJM). The FMJ tradition manifests itself in employee selection, training and vocational guidance. These endeavours
References: Adair, J. G. (1984), 'The Hawthorne effect: a reconsideration of the methodological artifact ', Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 33415. Anderson, N. and Prutton, K. (1993), 'Occupational psychology in business: strategic resource or purveyor of tests? ', The Occupational Psychologist, 20, 3-10. Blackler, F. (1982), 'Organizational psychology ', in S. Canter and D. Canter (eds), Psychology in Practice, Chichester: John Wiley. Blackler, F. and Brown, C. (1986), 'Alternative models to guide the design and introduction of the new information technologies into work organizations ', Journal of Occupational Brenner, M. (1981), 'Skills in the research interview ', in M. Argyle (ed.), Social Skills and Work, London: Methuen. Bryman, A. (1989), Research Methods and Organization Studies, London: Unwin Hyman. British Psychological Society (1986), Register of Members of the Division of Occupational Psychology, Leicester: BPS. Cox, T. (1978), Stress, London: Macmillan. Elden, M. and Chisholm, R. F. (1993), 'Emerging varieties of action research ', Human Relations, 46, 121-42 Furnham, A. (1983), 'Social psychology as common sense ', Bulletin of The British Psychological Society, 36,105-9 Halvor Teigen, K. (1986), 'Old truths or fresh insights? A study of students ' evaluations of proverbs ', British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 43-9. Herr 'iot, P (1984), Down from the Ivory Tower: Graduates and Their Jobs, Chichester: John Wiley. Iaffaldano, M. T. and Muchinsky, P M. (1985), 'Job satisfaction and job performance: a metaanalysis ', Psychological Bulletin, 97, 251-73. Johns, G. (1993), 'Constraints on the adoption of psychology-based personnel practices: lessons from organizational innovation ', Personnel Psychology, 46, 569-92. Kemp, N. J., Wall, T. D., Clegg, C. W. and Cordery, J. L. (1983), 'Autonomous work groups in a greenfield site: a comparative study ', Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56, 27-88. King, N. (1992), 'Modelling the innovation process: an empirical comparison of approaches ', Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 89-100. Lewin, K. (1945), 'The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology ', Sociometry, 8,126-36. Lewin, K. (1946), 'Action research and minority problems ', Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-6. Miner, J. B. (1984), 'The validity and usefulness of theories in an emerging organizational sciencé , Academy of Management Review, 9, 296-306. Offerrmann, L. R. and Gowing, M. K. (1990), 'Organizations of the future ', American Psychologist, 45, 95-108 Schaubroeck, J. and Kuehn, K. (1992), 'Research design in industrial and organizational psychology ', in C Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987), Discourse and Social Psychology - Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, London: Sage. Roethlisberger, F. J. and Dickson, W. J. (1939), Management and the Worker, New York: John Wiley. Schneider, S. C. and Dunbar, R. L. M. (1992), 'A psychoanalytic reading of hostile takeover events ', Academy of Management Review,17, 5377. Schweiso, J. (1984), 'What is common to common sense? ', Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 37, 43-5 psychological theories can explain organizational action ', Journal of Management,17, 80519. Stewart, A. M. (1982), 'The occupational psychologist ', in S. Canter and D. Canter (eds), Psychology in Practice, Chichester: John Wiley Symon, G. and Clegg, C. W. (1991), 'Technology-led change: a study of the implementation of CADCAM ', Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64; 273-90. Trist, E. L. and Bamforth, K. W. (1951), 'Some social and psychological consequences of the long-wall method of coal getting ', Human Relations, 4,1-38. Vemon, H. M. (1948), 'An autobiography ; Occupational Psychology, 23, 73-82. Warr, P (1987), Work, Unemployment and Mental Health, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Akavatalo, Rautatielaisenkatu 6, 00520 Helsinki 52, Finland France„ Association Nationale des Organisations des Psychologues 62 rue Liandier,13008 Marseille, Israel Israel Psychological Association PO Box 65244, Tel Aviv 61652, Israel Italy Italian Network of Professional Psychologists ' Associations Via in Publicolis 41, 00186