Once, a public historian has completed their research they then present their findings to the public. From here, the public reviews, defends, or debates the historian’s research. Regarding how a public historian’s research differs from that of their academic counterparts, public historians are …show more content…
As the profession of public history evolved from its roots as a graduate program, its definition as a study shows the versatileness of its historians. The separation between the public and academic historian strictly defines public history as an area of history whose historians serve the public and go outside their realm of study to answer society’s questions. Ethics helps to define public history as it ensures its historian’s credibility and ability to provide the public with truthful historical facts. Ultimately, the question of what is public history is seen through the historian’s devotion and willingness to serve