Preview

Puppies Pigs And People Summary

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2094 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Puppies Pigs And People Summary
Puppies, Pigs, and People For many years humans have been eating animal meat and their by-products. In Puppies, Pigs, and People, Norcross talks about how eating meat from animals can compare to the story of Fred’s and his puppies. He mentions how morals should play a part in the decision as to whether the acts are wrong or not. Norcross references causal impotence and how it effects the cases of both the puppies and factory farming. A major concern that is in the article is how disabled humans and how they should be treated compared to animals with similar cognitive levels. All of this is relevant to how the animals have been inhumanely treated by humans and also respect the humans morals. The story of Fred’s basement started when Fred was involved in a car accident a couple of years ago and had sustained a head trauma. When he was released from the hospital, he had no know ill effect from the injury. He went to his favorite restaurant and for dessert he ordered the restaurant’s famous rich dark chocolate mousse. When he started eating the mousses, Fred noticed that the dessert tasted bland and was missing the intense chocolate flavor that he loved. After being …show more content…
He uses the example of classifying guilty or innocent people by their gender and that Saint Peter sends four males to hell for being guilty, but also send the one innocent male to hell just because he is male. While sending all the males to hell Peter sent the four innocent females to heaven along with the guilty female. This example shows that an argument like that is absurd to determine the fate of the people in the afterlife. This would be the same in the marginal cases. Just because one animal species lacks that quality does not mean all the animals in that species

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author gives several specific examples throughout the article of animal abuse which he then follows with the corresponding consequences of these actions and the lack of implementation by the USDA in these incidents. The author writes in this specific order to create an emotional response from the audience by first making the reader remorseful for the animals explaining how they were brutally treated. He then describes how there were no consequences for these actions which consequently causes the reader to feel outraged and more likely to side with…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dear Diary, today is the morning after Piggy was killed from the falling bolder. Ralphs tribe, which I am a member of, went to castle rock where Jacks tribe lives. We were up there because early yesterday Jack stormed our shelters and stole our fire and Piggy’s glasses. When we went to confront Jack and his tribe a fight escalated between Jack and Ralph. From above Roger shoved an enormous bolder that pushed Piggy over a cliff and killed him. Piggy was very altruistic and unfeigned towards most everyone on the island. I was horrified by the sight of what happened to Piggy and haven’t slept all night. I’m hungry and tired and want to go home to my father and sister. This island adventure is not fun anymore.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imagine an animal’s feeling of panic and fear as it is about to be killed by a hunter or the isolation experienced as an animal sits in a laboratory, separated from its family and natural habitat, waiting to be harmed by harsh testing methods. Imagine the frightened state of a mother or father watching their innocent baby being captured. After considering the brutality towards animals in these scenarios, take into consideration the health benefits humans receive from different parts of these animals. Imagine health risks avoided through testing on animals first instead of on humans. Does human benefit justify the harm and killing of animals? Linda Hasselstrom’s essay “The Cow Versus The Animal Rights Activist” and Tom Regan’s “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” argue this question through analysis of the reason for killing animals, the method in which they are killed, and the morality of the killing of animals.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Temple Grandin Summary

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The book is about mainly farm animals and livestock, and how they are being mistreated. The goal is to try and implement practical methods of humanizing the wellbeing of these animals. The information in this book was intended to bring scientific research and practical application together. The print goes thoroughly over the housing of farm animals, management and transport, slaughter, and welfare improvement strategies just to name a few key points. It is more specific to farm animals; however, it could also be taken into account when discussing…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Williston discusses that the demand for meat products have increased livestock industries and the way factory farms are conducted to farm their livestock. The argument opposing the idea of meat production inflicting unnecessary pain to the animals is sufficiently supported by animal welfarism. Despite sound reasons that are provided, it is not enough to prohibit people from consuming meat (49). Williston stated that, “animal welfarism [is] the view that individual non-human animals have intrinsic value and that this imposes on us…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daniel Engster begins his argument in the “Care Ethics, Factory Farms, and Moral Vegetarianism” section of his article by claiming that we have a responsibility to care for the animals we make dependent upon us. He continues to explain the deplorable conditions of factory farms and that the animals raised for meat are not properly cared for. Engster gives responsibility to not only the workers and overseers of factory farms, but…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pigman Summary

    • 874 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pigman focuses on the idea of guilt and blame. John and Lorraine have both lied, felt guilt and were blamed at one point in the book, especially when they talk about the death of Mr. Pignati. An example was when “Lorraine can blame all the other things on me, but she was the one who picked out the Pigman’s phone number. If you ask me, I think he would have died anyway” (Zindel 20). John the narrator in chapter three is trying to comprehend why he and Lorraine were responsible for Mr. Pignati’s death. He doesn’t really think it is his fault and blaming it mostly on Lorraine. The author, Paul Zindel also wants the reader to decide who really is at fault of Mr. Pignati’s death. Lorraine was also guilty of blaming a classmate, Norton. Lorraine “[…] felt like saying one of us murdered Mr. Pignati, she would have blamed Norton. He’s the one who finally caused all the trouble” (Zindel 29). John and Lorraine are trying to blame other people that he was the direct cause of the death. However, it really was not his fault and the two friends were trying to cover up their guilt since they were with Mr. Pignati the most. Zindel also brings up the idea that people lie. John constantly lies whether it was in school or with Mr. Pignati. Lorraine says that “One time last term Miss King asked him what happened to the book report he was supposed to hand in on Johnny Tremain, and he told her that he had spilled some coffee on it the night before, and when the coffee dried, there was still sugar on the paper and so cockroaches ate the book report” (Zindel 26). John ends up lying so much to the point where he lies for the fun of it and hopes that people, especially teachers will believe him. There has been times were John and Lorraine have been honest with each other but they still lie to each other and Mr. Pignati.…

    • 874 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This topic of preconceived notions dictating how we treat animals is the theme of Karen Davis's “Thinking Like a Chicken.” One of the many interesting sub-topics of animal ethics addressed in this paper is the topic of domestication. If we created and formed domesticated animals through selective breeding do they deserve rights? Karen Davis and I would argue that they do (Davise, 1995). This is a case however when our preconceived notions about animals are right. Domesticated animals in our absence would die. They are no longer adapted to their local environment; they are adapted to the specific commodity we bred them for. So in many ways, they are our own creation. But who owns life? Not us and not amount of genetic engineering will ever change that. And even if we do own their life how is it not a sin to treat them so cruelly. In her paper, Karen Davis gives specific…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Atwood describes is not too far off from where genetics is today. Science and genetics have developed so far as to be able to use real pigs as “organ-growers” and many surgeons also use their skin for reconstructive surgeries. The question the rises about whether a good cause such as human health and saving human lives overrides the rights of an animal. A majority of society would be appalled to read such a sight of animal misconduct however, little of society recognizes that this issue exists today and is an ongoing issue. Flores…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his essay "Speciesism and Equality of Animals", Peter Singer accurately portrays his distraught outlook on the tendency for human beings to prioritize their desires over the dignity of other forms of life, a term also referred to as "speciesism." Singer's argument distinctively highlights the gruesome practices that animals are forced to partake in such as "pigs being reared in cages" or dogs receiving treatments of shock for a psychology journal (207). With these examples and many more, Singer strongly convinces the audience that all animal testing should be eliminated and frowned upon as a common practice. However, despite providing these examples that illustrate the flaws in speciesism, Singer fails to bring to light the benefits animal…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer’s “Down on the Factory Farm” and E.B. White’s “Death of a Pig” illustrate practices of raising animals for human consumption. The care and environment provided for the animals by both White and the factory farmer’s that Singer discusses can be labelled as ‘animal husbandry’. White and the factory farm worker’s animal husbandry methods can be deemed as ethical, or unethical. Bernard E. Rollin defines good animal husbandry as “keeping the animals under conditions to which their natures [are] biologically adapted, and augmenting these natural abilities by providing additional food, protection, care, or shelter” (6). Through this definition of ethics and the criteria established by the “Principles” found in James P. Sterba’s “Reconciling Anthropocentric and Nonanthropocentric…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The human population “loves” animals. But what we love the most our the animals we can make pets. We buy cats, dogs, and birds, bring them home and give them all our love. We are constantly watching cute videos all over the internet, and we cry when we see new born puppies. Abuse to dogs and kittens is one of the saddest things we can think of, but most people don’t see farm animals as the same way.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pigs: Common Lifestyle

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pigs, sheep, goats, and horses are very important to the common lifestyle these days. The listed animals are all used appreciatively in one way or another in our daily life. These animals all have a dad, mom, and children but the names and the way they are determined by name is much different than what humans do to classify each other. No animal has the same names for a certain gender because they are all different species.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meat vs. Vegan

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sunaura and Andrew Taylor’s “Is It Possible to Be a Conscientious Meat Eater?” is an informative essay about the dirty side of the meat industry. They speak out of the physical abuse and poor living conditions endured by animals raised solely for the purpose of consumption. Because of the inhumane treatment towards animals, Taylor talks about a vegan solution and the many benefits associated with it. Animal cruelty is a sensitive topic that readers can easily be persuaded to either side. But, for the purpose of this essay, the reader can be swayed towards being a conscientious consumer. As mentioned already, animal rights and veganism will be discussed.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals Vs Vegetarianism

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The processed meat industry is an 800 billion dollar industry killing over 10 billion animals each in the United State alone. Factory farmed livestock account for over 99% of all the meat consumed by Americans even though they are raised in these despicable conditions. Many animals raised on factory farms live in abhorrent conditions where they are unable to turn around in their own cages, live in their own feces, and never even see the light of day.. Peter Singer dives into the idea that all animals are equal in a selection taken out of his book Animal Liberation, found in James and Stuart Rachels’ The Right Thing To Do, and advocates for the humane treatment of animals. Singer lays out the argument that it is morally wrong to make animals…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays