Religion was, for the Puritans, first and foremost in their lives. To them, religion was centered around the Covenant, a personal, inner connection with God in which God promised to provide support and protection in return for loyal devotion and good works. As a result, …show more content…
the poem concentrates on the author's personal relationship with God. Bradstreet's first reaction is to lament over the fact that her house has burned down and all of her possessions have been devastated. After some thought however, Bradstreet realizes that it was originally God who provided her with these material assets in the first place, and it was therefore just of Him to rid her of them, especially if He believed that she was becoming too centered around the material world in which the Puritans had fled from. In the end, in spite of her initial grieving, Bradstreet realizes that it is necessary that she focus on obtaining salvation in the eyes of God and that it is God's heavenly home that is important, rather than the house whose ashes lie before her. Ultimately, it is Bradstreet's belief that God will protect and provide for her as a result of the Covenant that allows her to dismiss the paltry gloom she possesses at the loss of her home.
Puritan ideology required that they observe both the inner and outer events of their lives, a philosophy that significantly affected their literature. In the poem, Bradstreet's inner emotions, such as grief and sorrow, set the path to salvation. At the same time, external events, such as the burning of her house, contain messages from God. This poem is a testimony to Bradstreet's revelation, the belief that God reveals His purpose by means of divine intervention through natural events. Through this one event, the fire, God is able to prove to Bradstreet that His "heavenly home" is more important than her "material home" and that "material goods" are not found on Earth, but in Heaven, which consequently leads her on the road to salvation. On the other hand, Puritan literature does not simply focus on the crossing of the spiritual and physical worlds. While Bradstreet's poem extracts a valuable message on the inside, on the surface it helps to document the pleasurable moments the author felt while in the house. Had there been no conflict between her love of things in the material world, and her love of things in the spiritual world, her reactions, and consequently the entire poem, would have been quite different. The basis of Native American ideology held that the Earth should be preserved.
Native Americans believed in divine intention, the idea that humans are not masters of the world, but recipients of its resources. Consequently, they viewed themselves as being on the same level as the other creatures of nature. It was Mother Earth's support that allowed the Native Americans to endure. As creatures of nature, humans were linked together in the Circle of Life. Therefore, it was not merely nature's resources that allowed the Native Americans to survive, but the mutual aid and support they shared with one another. In other words, Native Americans shared a uniform goal in helping one another. As a result, had the incidence described in the Bradstreet's poem occurred with a Native American, the reaction would have been substantially different. Rather than looking to God to provide a solution to their problem, the Native Americans may have turned to each other. Native Americans were similar to the Puritans in that they basically had no material possession. However, it appears to be Anne Bradstreet's desire for materialistic possessions that makes God intervene and burn down her house. Contrastingly, Native Americans may have blamed the fire on Mother Nature, rather than God. Because Native Americans had a stronger connection to the Earth than to any man-made structure, the burning down of the house may represent a full cycle in the circle of life: a single seed blossoming into a sturdy tree is cut down and used to provide the foundation of a house, and when the house burns down, its ashes return it to where it originated. One final trait that could be a factor of the Native American reaction is their practice of stoicism. Because of this practice, the Native Americans didn't really show much emotion, and therefore it may be hard to describe the impact of the burning of one's house. While the Puritans would have looked to God to provide an explanation of the burning of a
home, Native Americans would have looked to Nature, and as a result, to one another.