Preview

Pursuit Policy: Putting Unnecessary Cases

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
300 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pursuit Policy: Putting Unnecessary Cases
In my pursuit policy my deputies will be expected to abide by the following rules. Putting innocent citizens’ life in danger in a chase is prohibited. If the suspect is thought to be dangerous backup will be called and the subject will be cornered in. Unless the suspect has put someone’s life in danger and a chase is the only option it is prohibited. As for a chase through another town under other jurisdiction, it will not happen. When you are close to crossing into another jurisdiction it needs to be called in and handled in that county. Unnecessary lawsuits are brought forth and can be prevented. Unless a pursuit is an absolute have to then it will not happen. If it will carry on into another county and their deputies cannot make it to them

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 08-1

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to ASC 230-10-45-14, sale of accounts receivable should presented as financing cash inflows in the statement of cash flows. According to ASC 230-10-45-12, Cash received from…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comm 393 Case Briefs

    • 12766 Words
    • 52 Pages

    1. CFAO 20-53 was not the reason that Liebmann was not permitted to serve in the Persian Gulf and was not in effect when the decision not to give him the position was made. CFAO 20-53 was not relevant to the action before the court and thus should not be considered.…

    • 12766 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief No 1

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff and Defendant: The plaintiff/appellant is Harvestons Securities, Inc. The defendant/appellee is Narnia Investments, Ltd.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For each of the following cases, indicate your decision and explain WHY you answered that way.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the police officer's use of the GPS without first obtaining a search warrant constitute an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment?…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Continuing Case

    • 5993 Words
    • 24 Pages

    CM Corporation (CMC) was founded in 2000 by Eric Conner and Phil Martin. The company designs, installs, and services security systems for high-tech companies. The founders, who describe themselves as "entrepreneurial geeks," met in a computer lab when they were teenagers and found they had common interests in working on security systems for critical industries. In January 2012, CMC hired you as an accounting intern.…

    • 5993 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule is intended to reject prove acquired disregarding a criminal litigant's Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment ensures against irrational quests and seizures by law requirement work force. On the off chance that the hunt of a criminal suspect is preposterous, the proof acquired in the pursuit will be rejected from trial.The exclusionary administer is a court-made run the show. This implies it was made not in statutes go by authoritative bodies but instead by the U.S. Incomparable Court. The exclusionary control applies in government courts by goodness of the Fourth Amendment. The Court has decided that it applies in state courts in spite of the fact that the due procedure condition of the Fourteenth Amendment.(The Bill of Rights—the…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A major case that helped further clarify the exclusionary rule in the justice system was the Davis v. The United States. The case regarded the admissibility of evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches and seizures derived from the fourth amendment. The implications for law enforcement and prosecution were also clarified by the exclusionary rule during the trial. Case Background Willie Davis was stopped by officers at a routine vehicle stop where he was asked for his name and decided to give a false name. Once the officers saw that Davis had given them a false name, he was arrested, and officers decided to search his vehicle.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I find that the evidence would still be valid based on the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. The good faith exception states “that If officers had a reasonable, good-faith belief that they were acting per legal authority, such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective, the illegally seized evidence is admissible” (Busby, 2009). The good faith exception was established by a 6-3 U.S Supreme court decision in the United States v. Leon 468 U.S. 897 (1984). The majority opinion, as written by Bryon R. White, was that the exclusionary rule was established to deter law enforcements violations of the 4th amendment warranting against illegal search and seizure. Therefore “reliable physical evidence seized by officers reasonably relying on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate” did not violate the exclusionary rule and the evidence was to be admitted (Kaye, 2011). The good faith exception was reviewed and expanded in Arizona v. Evans 514 U.S. 1 (1995), a case that I feel directly correlates to my decision reference the admissibility of the evidence in the example given. In Arizona v. Evans an officer conducts a legal traffic stop. Upon running the driver’s license the officer discovers an outstanding warrant for arrest. Pursuant to the arrest a search was conduct and marijuana discovered. When charging Evan’s when possession the officers discovered that the warrant had been quashed. In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that this was not a violation of Evan’s 4th Amendment rights since the evidence, though obtained based on an illegal warrant, was legal based on the good faith…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis and Application

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Exigent Circumstances means emergency conditions. Circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that any relevant prompt action was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or civilians, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts (The lectric law library, 1995-2011). According to cased United States V. McConney (United States V. McConney, 1984), Exigent circumstances did exist for Officer Smith to Chase the vehicle in question because the…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frivolous Lawsuits

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Lynn Hubbard is handicapped. She happens to also have her own law firm. In the past year, she sued more than 600 nearly irreproachable institutions for over two million dollars. Hubbard and her entourage of scheming lawyers have not done anything illegal. Some may argue that she has simply exercised her right to the legal system. In any case, Hubbard is part of the growing American society that has discovered large money in mass litigation. This rise in greedy and manipulative lawyers has provided Americans with a skewed financial interest in the American courtroom and has hindered the justice system as a whole. Congress must reexamine tort reform to provide Americans with a trustworthy and secure justice system from frivolous lawsuits.…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does notoriety affect the outcome of a criminal court proceeding? A trial’s outcome should not be based on the notoriety of it, yet it is. Due to media coverage, the length of the trial, and the notoriety of the people who committed the crime, the outcome of the trial is affected. The Manson trials and the trial of Leopold and Loeb are two prime example of how notoriety can affect a criminal court proceeding. An analysis of two criminal court proceedings, the Manson trial and the trial of Leopold and Loeb, reveals that notoriety does affect criminal court proceedings. Even though criminal court proceedings should be based on unbiased information and evidence, overall, the notoriety of the case impacts it.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Attrition

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Often times people wonder why only a small amount of the crimes reported to the police make it to court. This division of the cases is due to one of the major problems of the criminal justice system, case attrition. Cases can be dissolved at various points in the criminal justice system so the end result is that there are thousands that do not make it to court. Examples of things that can cause cases to be dissolved are plea bargaining, lack of evidence causing a case to completely fall apart, and the fact that sometimes cases are just seen as not worth wasting time on in an already overloaded criminal justice system. When viewing a diagram of case attrition it has the view of a top heavy, upside down pyramid. An example of a case that would not make it to court is a rape in which the victim could not provide a description of the person who attacked them, and there was no physical evidence of a rape when a rape kit was preformed. Case attrition has an effect on the criminal justice system in that sometimes things that are reported are not legally defined as a crime, therefore it cannot be taken to court to be prosecuted until laws are changed. Case attrition also allows the police to use discretion when doing their jobs. Discretion varies from officer to officer and agency to agency. Sometimes agencies have protocol that officers must follow their agencies protocol when enforcing…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Questions

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. How is the policy portfolio of Harvard determined? What are the three major asset classes in the portfolio as of May 1999? Internally, by the HMC. The Board of the corp determined the Pol Port, but the mgmt. was permitted to make short-run decisions within certain constraints. HMC, considered 3 things when looking at asset classes: expected future rel returns, volatility of real returns, and the correlation of the real return on each asset class w/ the real return on all other asset classes.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How might these traits have helped Schwarzenegger get to where he is now? – These traits will help him in his career of governor due to fact he went step by step to current position and I believe that restless in bodybuilding, outstanding traits in acting and having good networking skills, along this aspects he got lot of influent friends and they helped him.…

    • 2864 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays