Preview

Quakerism Human Nature

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1346 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Quakerism Human Nature
The Human Nature Perspectives of Quakers and Fundamentalists The main argument for the dissimilarities between Quakerism and Fundamentalism is their particular beliefs regarding human nature, specifically on what human nature vitally is. Quakers place an emphasis on what they term “the divine Light within”, while Fundamentalists put emphasis on human nature’s sinful ways. Their opposing views regarding human nature lead to an interesting debate on theology and consequently the way humans behave. In comparing the conflicting beliefs of Quakers and Fundamentalists with regard to human nature, it can be concluded that the Quakers’ theological affirmation or the affirmation of the “divine Light Within” is perhaps the most important element …show more content…
The first account of creation states that humans are formed “in the image of God” and is rather in line with Quaker ideals. Quakers believe an intimacy between human nature and God exists, that there is a shared likeness and goodness between the two. The next account of creation, the story of the Fall from the Garden of Eden, is more harmonious with a Fundamentalist approach to human nature. It emphasizes the belief that human nature is essentially defiant, corrupt, and evil. In this view, human nature is separate from God because of the removal of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden and subsequently God’s anger and disappointment towards …show more content…
As indicated by Augustine (d. 430), prior to the Adam and Eve’s banishment from Eden, humans lacked th ability to commit sin. Yet, after Adam and Eve were banned from Eden, they could not avoid sinning. Fundamentalists believe at their core human nature will sin, no matter what. Fundamentalism derives its view of human nature from Augustine, Luther and Calvin (King n.d.). Basically, Fundamentalism embraces a rather pessimistic view of human nature where it is impossible for humans not to commit sin. Humans sin continually, in everything they do. In a Fundamentalists view of human nature, human beings are unable to steer clear of the fact that everything they do is a result of their selfishness and desires. Prior to the Fall, Fundamentalists believe that humans lived in a harmony and united environment with God. The Fall marked the onset of mankind’s separation from God and God’s will. Human nature is considered separate from God, therefore, humans act on their free will and not God’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Evaluate the relative importance of the following factors in Cadbury’s success as a company up until 1939: a) Quaker values b) Sales and marketing c) Product innovation…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By calling someone a fundamentalist, one would suggest that that person only is motivated by religious beliefs rather than the society and the world in general. This seems like an odd statement, considering that he just two paragraphs later quote Sheikh Ahmed Yassin as stating that there is no clear distinction between religion and politics, the distinction being a Western way of thinking (ibid, locations 138-139). When he recognizes that that is the case, why does he insist that calling a person fundamentalist is denying his ability to think both religiously and politically? A non-Western fundamentalist would necessarily insist on religion and politics being the same or so closely connected that there are no crucial distinction. That is at least the case for both traditional Judaism and…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secular Humanism, alternatively known as humanism, “involves an affirmation of immanent, this-worldly realities, alone with a denial or exclusion of transcendent, other-worldly realities”. Secular Humanism is its own belief system of rejecting God when man chooses to no longer be a subservient to a higher, supernatural authority. It is noted as a worldview and lifestyle oriented to the ungodly rather than the spiritual. Norman Richard describes man as “piece of work” which is ultimately called humanism. “If a human being is ‘a piece of work’, this suggests a workman who fashioned us – presumably a divine creator”. The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of secular humanism, followed by an evaluation of objective criteria of…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Theodore Parker’s religion he believed that all human beings had an inherent spiritual faculty, and by reaching into and outside oneself, the path to the Divine and the truth would be revealed. “After that Parker taught at a school in Watertown and among other places to earn a little money. He established himself as one of the Transcendentalist, and for a time the Massachusetts Historical Review”. “Parker theologically liberal brand of christianity is not only worthy of close study, the author seems to suggest; it begs for retrieval. It is something else he wanted to…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is up to him or her to give any true benefit to their life, by making an impact in their life (69). Through this, they are able to make a clear and confident impact in another human beings life. However, since “man is a machine and ultimately not in control of what happens, life cannot have any real value or significance.” (69). Morality and ethics asks what is morally and ethically right versus wrong and how a human being should live, then God must exist to deliver what is right and wrong (71). That being so, secular humanism does not believe in a God, and nor does He exist. Secular Humanists believe that there is no “absolute truth”, and relies heavily on the fact that “truth is dependent upon the individual or society and is subject to change” (71). Secular Humanism is not worried about the question of destiny. Once a human being has passed on, all that matters is what…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fundamentalism is an absurdly broad term. The term can best be described as a movement that is opposed to the modernization or secularization of a nation, and desires a call back to a stricter and more religious way of life. In terms of the Middle East John Voll describes fundamentalism as the call back to the path of Islam (Voll 347). Saba Mahmood makes several strong arguments on why the term fundamentalist is often inaccurate in its usage. Her first argument is that the term fundamentalism categorizes many contrasting ideas as one. Another argument she presents is the hypocritical view that the West has on fundamentalism.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the beginning of mankind, man has sought some form of a higher entity and a basis for humanity. Since the beginning, it has always been important to find a greater purpose for human life--to discover life’s meaning. Naturally, due to cultural differences, incongruities arose in man’s interpretation of how best to live and how best to be faithful, and eventually man focused more on those differences rather than the similar theme that was emphasized in each of the Holy Books: to love our neighbors and to love God, or whatever higher entity we chose to worship (Interview). As time progressed, these differences in opinion began to become forms of identification, and man began to use faith and religion to distinguish themselves from one another.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining whether the God you praise and worship is choleric because of your presence by the sins you’ve created is a never ending battle in the 17th-18th centuries. Upon the Burning of Our House is a poem, with nine stanzas, written by Anne Bradstreet explaining her understanding and able to live and learn from sin with God. Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God is a work, written as a sermon, by Jonathan Edwards who preaches to all the non-Puritan sinners, that if they don’t convert and take blame for their sins, God’s anger toward them will be unbearable and force them to the pits of hell. Analyzing Bradstreet’s and Edwards’ works, a reader can distinguish the personality of the two writers and the different views of God that people acquire.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nineteenth century America contained a bewildering array of Protestant sects and denominations, with different doctrines, practices, and organizational forms. But by the 1830s almost all of these bodies had a deep evangelical emphasis in common. Protestantism has always contained an important evangelical strain, but it was in the nineteenth century that a particular style of evangelicalism became the dominant form of spiritual expression. What above all else characterized this evangelicalism was its dynamism, the pervasive sense of activist energy it released. As Charles Grandison Finney, the leading evangelical of mid-nineteenth century America, put it: "religion is the work of man, it is something for man to do." This evangelical activism involved an important doctrinal shift away from the predominately Calvinist orientation that had characterized much of eighteenth-century American Christianity. Eighteenth-century Calvinists like Jonathan Edwards or George Whitefield had stressed the sinful nature of humans and their utter incapacity to overcome this nature without the direct action of the grace of God working through the Holy Spirit. Salvation was purely in God's hands, something he dispensed as he saw fit for his own reasons. Nineteenth-century evangelicals like Finney, or Lyman Beecher, or Francis Asbury, were no less unrelenting in their emphasis on the terrible sinfulness of humans. But they focused on sin as human action. For all they preached hellfire and damnation, they nonetheless harbored an unshakable practical belief in the capacity of humans for moral action, in the ability of humans to turn away from sinful behavior and embrace moral action. Whatever their particular doctrinal stance, most nineteenth-century evangelicals preached a kind of practical Arminianism which emphasized the duty and ability of sinners to repent and desist from sin.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    People are extremely motivated by self-interest, even as societies have evolved and grown larger. While the more intertwined societies did lead to a greater need for cooperation in order to live as peacefully as possible, the need to follow the rules of that society can still be ignored when self-interests are present. The need to live by a set of moral rules is well explained by connecting God and morality. As God holds a person accountable, following the moral rules is now is that person’s interest. So even while the person may act according to society, the actions are still explained by the incentives and sanctions placed by God with the promise of Heaven and the threat of Hell, respectively. However, the Divine Command Theory falls short by basing morality solely on God’s commands. Morality then seems subject to God’s whims, which makes morality arbitrary. The opposing view counters strongly with the existence of morals within atheists. For if morals are based only on God’s will, then atheists must be godless brutes lacking any semblance to a moral compass. The morality of atheists is clearly evident, yet the argument failed to establish a reason for morals other acknowledging damage done to the…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When comparing the New Hampshire Baptist Confession of Faith (NHBCF) to the Treatise on Faith and Practice of the Free Will Baptists (TFPFWB) the most significant observation is that the New Hampshire Baptists were Calvinists and the Free Will Baptists derive from the Arminian faith. The analysis of these two movements which are so closely related in time and foundational beliefs is enough to make one wonder what diverging ideas would distinguish one from the other and how are those differences are expressed in their Confession of Faith statements respectively.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    East of Eden Analysis

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Humans are in an internal war of good and evil. John Steinbeck, the author of East of Eden, used the internal conflict of virtue and vice in the development of his characters. While some characters have evil in their souls, others have a passion of good. In the case of the novel being biblically allegorical, the ironies of the symbols and situations may cause one to psychoanalyze the initial intention of Steinbeck in writing the story. Steinbeck is creating somewhat of a bible for his children, as he is God and the characters represent people in the bible. He is sewing the seeds for a place mark of today that started yesterday. As Steinbeck stated in the novel, "We have only one story." (Steinbeck, John, East of Eden, 415) The evolution of the characters are based off of Steinbeck's 'story', his story, the only story he knows, that caused the quarrel within himself to choose a side of good or evil. I am certain that underneath the top layers of frailty in humans, yearns the drive to be good. But, evil prevails.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Parable of the Sadhu

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bowen’s friend was a committed Quaker that followed the Virtue Approach. His thinking process revolved around what kind of person he thought he should be. When no one seemed to share that vision, not even his friend, he became incensed at the idea of having to leave the holy man on his own.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious fundamentalism was initially caused by the desire to recreate the golden age of the religion and improving the present, yet they were also unwilling to compromise with reality. Religious fundamental groups became more popular as they were able to convince the people that the mainstream groups were unable to do a good job in various areas thus leading to a rise in people wanting to join these groups, resulting in the rise of religious fundamentalism. Soon, at the turn of a new millennium, religious ideology was clearly back on political agenda in frightening ways, they were accompanied by violence after problems were unable to be solved.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The relutant

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The reluctant fundamentalist not only focuses on fundamentalism but focuses on values that change identity…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays