1
A Study of the Effects of Social Media Use and Addiction on Relationship Satisfaction Kathryn Porter Jessica Mitchell Meghan Grace Shawna Shinosky Valerie Gordon Chapman University
Effects of Social Media Use on Relationship Satisfaction Abstract Based on traditional theories of relationship satisfaction and Internet dependency, this study examined the relationship between social media use and addiction to interpersonal relationship satisfaction with an individual’s closest relationship. Two hundred nineteen (N =
2
219) individuals between the ages of 18 and 25 who are users of social media participated in an online questionnaire about their satisfaction with their closest interpersonal relationship. Our results were based on one-tailed correlations between time spent on social media, social media withdrawal, and their connection to relationship satisfaction. The results did not support our hypothesis and there was a negative correlation between social media use and relationship satisfaction. Further implications and future investigations of the effects of social media use are discussed. Keywords: relationship satisfaction; social media use; Internet dependency; interpersonal
Effects of Social Media Use on Relationship Satisfaction Effects of Social Media Use on Relationship Satisfaction Social media, a web-based and mobile technology, has turned communication into a
3
social dialogue, and dominates the younger generation and their culture. As of 2010, Generation Y has outnumbered Baby Boomers, and 96% of Gen Y has joined a social network (Qualman, 2009). Social media is now the number one use for the Internet, and this percentage is growing larger every day (Qualman, 2009). As a result, the population is becoming more dependent on social media, which has a led to a number of beneficial and detrimental outcomes. The world is more connected now than ever before because of this
References: Anderson, T., & Emmers-Sommer, T. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 57(2), 153-172. doi:10.1080/10510970600666834 Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54, 927-931. Brown, A. (2011). Relationships, community, and identity in the new virtual society. Futurist, 45(2), 29-34. Burns, D. D. (1993). Ten days to self-esteem. New York: HarperCollins. Charney, T., & Greenberg, B. (2001). Uses and gratifications of the Internet. In C. Lin & D. 25 Atkin (Eds.), Communication, technology and society: New media adoption and uses and gratifications (pp. 383-406). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton. Coyne, S., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. (2011). "I luv u :)!": A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150-162. Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2004). The effects of communication quality and quantity indicators on intimacy and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 399-411. Ewing, J. A. (1984). Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE Questionnaire. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252(14), 1905-1907. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. Effects of Social Media Use on Relationship Satisfaction Kelly, K. (2011). Understanding technological evolution and diversity. Futurist, 45(2), 44-48. 26 Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(SPECIAL ISSUE: SOCIAL MEDIA), 241-251. Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Bowman, L. L. (2007). Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 560-566. Mitchell, K., & Beard, F. (2010). Measuring Internet dependence among college students: A replication and confirmatory analysis. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 25(2), 15-28. Mitchell, P. (2000). Internet addiction: Genuine diagnosis or not? The Lancet, 355(9204), 632 Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. B., & Dunbar, R. M. (2011). Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14(4), 253-258. Qualman, E. (2009, August 11). Statistics show social media is bigger than you think. Retrieved from http://www.socialnomics.net/2009/08/11/statistics-show-social-media-is-biggerthan-you-think/ Sheldon, P. (2008). Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 23(2), 39-53. Solis, B., & Breakenridge D. (2009). Putting the public back in public relations: How social media is reinventing the aging business of PR. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Sun, S., Rubin, A. M., & Haridakis, P. M. (2008). The role of motivation and media involvement in explaining Internet dependency. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Effects of Social Media Use on Relationship Satisfaction Media, 52(3), 408-431. VanLear, C. A. (1991). Testing a cyclical model of communicative openness in relationship development: Two longitudinal studies. Communication Monographs, 58, 337-361. Young, K. S. (1999). Internet addiction: Symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. In L. Van de Creek, & X. Jackson, Innovations in clinical practice: a source book (Vol. 17; 19–31). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press. 27