The way United Nations works is very unique and many parts play significant roles to make it a viable organization. First it is the role of states that have different functions and powers that contribute to the UN. Major powers such as the United States, China, Russia, France, and Great Britain play key roles that make the UN a viable organization. There are also non state actors such as regional organizations, and NGO’s that also have significant roles towards the United Nations. The United States is the most important power to the UN and plays a key role to making it a viable organization. Shaping the international system structure after World War 2, including the establishment of IGO’s is one example. However, the US started getting mixed feelings about international organizations and withdrew from several of them. In the Security Council, the US used its veto power 34 times between 1976 and 1985. In 2003, US went to war against Iraq without authorization of the Security Council. Therefore, US were not taking the UN seriously. This changed when Ambassador Susan Rice got appointed and restored her position to cabinet status. In 2009, the US sighed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, making it the first action on an international human rights treaty since 2002. Several factors, such as the role of Congress have changed this US ambivalence. Congress controls the budget, which is an important source of US power in the UN. This is very significant to the relationship of the US and UN. Mainly, America’s unique history, its record of democracy, and its support for human rights all give it a special role in international relations. This is called the belief of exceptionalism, which is where the US power in the UN is derived from. Therefore, the UN needs this support from US if it is to remain a vital organization. Russia is also a major power in the UN and its influence in the Security Council including veto power is significant in the UN. Since 2005, Russia has had a major role in international relations such as dealing with Iran’s nuclear program. Russia’s long involvement in Iran allows its leaders to offer alternative diplomatic solutions, which is something the other major powers of the P-5 can’t do. Its ability to veto power also gives it influence in the Security Council deliberations over sanctions. Therefore, Russia has its own ability to use its power in the UN, aside from the US to keep this organization vital. France and Great Britain as members of the P-5 hold veto power, continue to be significant donors and major actors in the UN. They have played key roles in post Cold War UN peacekeeping and enforcement operations by providing troops in the Gulf War and Afghanistan. Since 1990, each had a responsibility for a subcontracted enforcement operation, Great Britain in Sierra Leone and France in Rwanda. This explains what kind of power they have in the Security Council. However, these powers also have different views in UN politics. France has shown greater interest than Great Britain in developing a common European position, which basically means taking a common position on major issues among members of the European Union. Even though Great Britain and France have their own views on UN politics and Security Council decisions, their strong involvement in UN peacekeeping operations, its participation in the 1991 Gulf War, and ongoing NATO operations in Afghanistan make them significant actors to the UN. They still have continuing ties with their former colonies which help them retain influence and interests in the developing world. Last but not least, the fifth major power and permanent member of the city council, China, has become more active in the UN since the 1990’s. China’s dramatic economic growth has given them the power they have now in the UN. As of 2010, everything has increased for China, such as national pride, increasing assertiveness, and of course a burgeoning economy. Due to this, China had to balance its own interests and representing those of other developing states. At first, The World Bank was one of the biggest funders of external aid to China, now China is a lender. With this economic boom, as the most populous state in the world, only non western member of the p-5, a nuclear weapons state, and the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide with veto power, China is a key actor. Then there are key actors such as the Secretary General and the UN Secretariat. First, the Secretary General has many functions and one is to serve as a neutral communications channel and intermediary for the global community. Therefore you need diplomatic skills to be able to handle the tasks and jobs presented. They are responsible for making an annual report to the General Assembly and notifying the Security Council of matters that might threaten peace and security. The UN Secretariat derives authority in performing duties of office. They derive legitimacy from the moral purposes of the organization and they derive power from their missions of serving others. One of its main duties is to publish all the treaties and international agreements the UN makes. Other duties are to act as a mediator or administer different peacekeeping operations. These actors are important in the UN because they can shape the success or failure of operations by their actions.
Yet influence in international institutions is not only limited to states. Non state actors have come to play leading roles in the UN as well. NGO’s is one of those non state actors. NGO’s are made up of private individuals that come together for a common purpose. These groups are formed and come together for different purposes. Some NGO’s are formed to advocate a particular cause such as human rights. Others come together to provide services such as disaster relief. NGO’s are under estimated to some extent because they are under the radar. Most people don’t know that NGO’s have more money than most governments. In this world, the more money you have the more power you have. Therefore, NGO’s can become pressure groups to force countries into making decisions.
NGO’s have always had the money but their political power grew gradually. In 1997, they first gained limited access to Security Council meetings. Then through the NGO working group on the Security Council, they gained a voice in council deliberations. Informal consultations between NGO’s, the Security Council president, and council members became a common practice. NGO’s are very important to the UN and special agencies. UN specialized agencies and programs have long welcomed the involvement of NGO’s. Agencies such as UNICEF and UNESCO have enjoyed an extensive network of national commissions, scientific councils, and more than 600 NGO’s in consultation. NGO’s are significant because in most cases, they are contractors of services these specialized agencies provide.
In the General Assembly, there are four main NGO’s that have specialized privileges. For example, they participate as observers in all assembly sessions. Also since the late 1980’s, NGO’s have had access as petitioners to some assembly committees. Therefore this non state actor plays many different roles in many aspects of the UN that keeps this organization vital and unique.
In conclusion, the United Nations is the biggest and most important organization in the world that runs very unique. All these state and non state actors play their own different roles that keep the UN viable till this day. Major Powers such as US, China, and Russia and even non state actors such as NGO’s has their own affect on the UN. Without any of these actors, the UN would be much different and probably not viable. United Nations is very important to this world; hence it keeps peace and security throughout all nations. I still have much to learn about this global organization.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
circular failure of the UN: lack of support from member countries, especially the U.S and the…
- 734 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Source B originates from an academic and seem to have a sound understanding of the workings of the United Nations. Both Sources B and C notes that the public fails to highlight the positive impacts of veto power. Former UN official, cited in source C is observant and can be deemed credible due to his position. This is partially accurate, as veto power has vested a sense of responsibilities in powers. It is true that UNGA, where no veto power exists, had failed miserably on coming with action, but became a ‘debating club’ of the UN, which is explicitly stated in Source E. Source B also connotes the view that the scope of the effect of Veto power is exaggerated and takes a narrow viewpoint, which cites Taiwan as a permanent member of UNSC during the Cold War, but did not represent the major world powers of the world. This point can be reflected in the Iran-Iraqi war, in which the permanent members did not exercise veto powers. This is also supported in Source C, which highlights the growth in the number of countries in UNSC, which culminated a democratic atmosphere. This is shown in the statistics of source A, which clearly shows a declining trend of the use of veto power, and has not been used throughout the Cold War on posing as a barrier to…
- 1088 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States of America is a hegemonic power which has great influence in international politics due to its contributions to history. President Barrack Obama said in his speech at the United States Military Academy at West Point, “…America must always lead on the world stage. If we don’t, no one else will.” When it comes down to which country holds greater influence in the international system, America is known in being a hegemon which has influence in many international institutions. The United States of America took the lead in founding the United Nations and contributes the most money towards the UN’s spending, thus shapes the UN in favour of its interests. This concept of hegemony was analyzed by Gramsci, whom used Machiavelli’s view of power as a centaur, “half man and half beast”, to argue power is a mixture of coercion and consent which are tools for hegemonic states which is what realists agree with1. In this sense, the United States has been using such “tools” to seek national interest. Thus, by examining Obama’s speech through Realist, Liberal and Marxist/critical perspectives, this essay will argue that the perspective of realism best defines America’s position in the global order through its consecutive use of hard power.…
- 2371 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In England the main framework is the early year’s foundation stage 2008, which has now been superseded by the 2012 framework.…
- 1091 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The textbook authors argue that the UN functions as a useful instrument of U.S. foreign policy.…
- 590 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As a smaller country, we cannot be involved in all issues of the UN, however our main interests lie in the areas of international security and disarmament; environment protection; development and human rights; and in issues relating to agriculture, refugees and international nuclear safeguards.…
- 1291 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Scene IV Patricia is zipping up her suitcase. She is presentable, well-dressed, and in orbit. It is morning, sunshine enters through the window. The room’s temperature feels cool and comfortable to be in. The beds are unmade, proof that housekeeping has not knocked on their door yet.…
- 1033 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States has support the creation of international courts to prosecute serious violations of human rights namely Nuremberg and Tokyo atrocities chase committed during World War II. Since then, the US is an important supporter of the creation of the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), both of which were approved by the Security Council. However, there was the different story for International Criminal Court (ICC). In fact, the United States did not ratify the Rome Statute of ICC nor participating in the Court which exercised their jurisdiction as a permanent international…
- 1255 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The UN under the guise of being peacekeepers, have used their position to drive chaos and fear; ergo, the UN is a criminal organization (e.g., human trafficking, corruption, terror). UN peacekeepers are essentially free to get away with terrible crimes because they know this jurisdictional gap provides them with impunity. I am of the opinion, that it would behoove the United States to defund specific UN departments and organizations; ergo, the UN needs to quit treating D.C. as a sugar daddy. They have outlived their once useful purpose and now resort to an entrenched, complicit role with corruption and terror. The UN argues that they are all we have and if this is the case, then it is time to employ changes. It is time to awaken from our…
- 140 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
o United States affiliation with the United Nations and how our latest decision towards Iran is affecting the UN and its approach to…
- 3758 Words
- 16 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The United Nations is an international organization that fights for world peace, and strives to control international law, international security, economic development, social progress, and human rights. In the United Nation’s preamble, it states the organization is “determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war…” and “…to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom.” However, the U.N. can often be ineffective and it has been an ongoing debate between the world’s leaders whether or not intervention is justified when inhumane acts are committed in foreign lands. Too many human beings have been victims of violence, rape and/or other crimes on the U.N.’s watch all because the organization is not authorized to forcefully intervene in another country. The United Nations Security Council is responsible for preserving peace between nations and even within nations, and when a nation is committing atrocious acts against its citizens, the U.N. and other nations should have the right to intervene militarily to end those abuses.…
- 1067 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Also, the Soviet Union was strongly communist while the U.S. believed in traditional Western democracy and tried to contain communism from spreading with various policies. All these components, including tension due to bipolarity where both parties had overwhelming amounts of influence internationally and regionally, evidently lead to the Cold War. In order to turn nations and their people against the Soviet Union during the Cold War era, the U.S. built up its image as a global leader in human rights and democracy, but in reality, the U.S. only intervened in those areas when the situation served beneficial and even committed human rights violations of their own. Human rights track records, although often overlooked or ignored by governments, are very important in helping establish a norm where people are protected from abuse. People all deserve to some degree similar freedoms such as the rights to life, liberty, and security; however, it is quite difficult to set and re enforce universal standards which is why the UN was so revolutionary. The UN tried to set human rights regulations internationally and even though it did not succeed greatly, it was still a step in the right direction…
- 786 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
We as the USA uphold and mainly want the greatest good for the greatest amount (UDHR). This decree was essentially made by America and applied to the UN so other countries can have the same ideals of the USA.…
- 1703 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
As the world’s largest economic and military power, the United States is one of the most influential countries in the modern world. When considering the role that America must play in preventing genocide around the globe, it is crucial to appraise the impact we have on other countries. Taking into account the capability of the United States to shape the outlooks other countries have on the issue of genocide, the United States should take responsibility for ending a genocide and lead the rest of the world by example. However, it is imperative that other countries collaborate and cooperate with the effort to end genocide. The most successful path to the prevention of genocide is for countries all over the world to contribute financially, politically, and militarily. The United Nations, an international organization between several countries around the world, should make genocide one of their top priorities. The United Nations focuses on…
- 1213 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Because of this, American soldiers have fought in Afghanistan, Guam, Bosnia and an additional 150 countries around the world. Currently, we have 150,560 soldiers stationed in foreign countries ranging from South Korea to Germany. This is also why the US Navy patrols the seas to prevent the smuggling of illegal resources and immigrants. These are the components of an effective and needed world policeman. We have learned from past events that we cannot ignore imminent danger nor count on others for protection. If we fail to play a proactive role in areas of unrest, as a world power, we will suffer the greatest. When looking at other alternatives to fill the role of world policeman, both the UN and NATO come to mind. Although they are often considered, they cannot compare to the United States. Regarding the UN, the most serious instance of their peacekeeping scandals has occurred in Congo. To briefly explain, in Congo UN peacekeepers and civilian personnel have committed to protecting some of the most vulnerable women and children in the…
- 801 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays