Also, this critique is shown in the case study of R.v Courtaulds Fibres Canada Inc. when the court had canceled out all of charges that should be imposed for the spill because this company had shown the due diligence towards to the spill. In fact, even though the company eventually avoided the charge for the spill because of its due diligence the problem that required standard for due diligence has not been defined has not yet addressed. As the questions being posted on the article, how long does a company take to be qualified as being duly diligent? What kinds of steps the company takes to be regarded as having due diligence by government? Since those questions are not being answered completely, we can not say that one company can avoid any cost and charge for the environmental damage they produced because of due diligence without clearly defined. Fortunately, many companies have been taken the actions proactively for their environment management in an effort to make their process more
Also, this critique is shown in the case study of R.v Courtaulds Fibres Canada Inc. when the court had canceled out all of charges that should be imposed for the spill because this company had shown the due diligence towards to the spill. In fact, even though the company eventually avoided the charge for the spill because of its due diligence the problem that required standard for due diligence has not been defined has not yet addressed. As the questions being posted on the article, how long does a company take to be qualified as being duly diligent? What kinds of steps the company takes to be regarded as having due diligence by government? Since those questions are not being answered completely, we can not say that one company can avoid any cost and charge for the environmental damage they produced because of due diligence without clearly defined. Fortunately, many companies have been taken the actions proactively for their environment management in an effort to make their process more