Jury nullification is a situation where the jury gives a non guilty judgment to a defendant whom he has evidence that he is guilty of the offence based on various reasons. It occurs when there is enough evidence to convict the defendant but the jury is persuaded that conviction is being injustice to the accused. Jury nullification is mainly based on the race of the defendant or the unjustness of the ruling against the defendant among other factors (Rivera, 2006).
Some people view that the jurors should consider this option when they are faced with situation where the defendant is from a minority and he is persuaded that the law is unjust to the defendant. Some people believe that this is the only way to bring equality in our courts of law. They believe that jury nullification based on race is the only way to bring change and reduce racial discrimination in the American law courts. The judgment issued by the judge is not supposed to be wholly based on facts but should consider factors such as the racial injustices and inequalities based on their wisdom and experience. Otherwise a machine can effectively replace the judges (Rivera, 2006).
A good number of Americans are not happy about a criminal being let free not because the law is unjust, but because he belong to a certain race. They view jury nullification as releasing wrong does back to the society to commit more crimes. The juror should therefore avoid jury nullification and consider the vulgarity of the criminal act committed, the background of the defendant and whether the law is just or not before deciding on this option. Race based jury nullification is subject to misuse by both the white and the black jurors. In many occasions jury nullification has been used to favor a certain race at the expense of the other race. Whites who have committed crimes against the blacks have been set free by juries at the expense of the blacks. Black juries have also misused jury nullification to free those who harm their enemies thus using race based nullification as a revenge tool against their enemies. (Jemal, 1997).
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Include contemporary examples ( within the last 10 years ) of ethnicity-based jury nullification. Note: you can use news articles ]…
- 370 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Jury Nullification “It is not only the juror’s right, but his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” This is what John Adams said of jury nullification. John Jay, who was the first justice of the Supreme Court said, “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” So what is jury nullification and how does it influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices? The definition of jury nullification according to thefreedictionary.com website jury nullification is defined as a sanctioned doctrine wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the…
- 1286 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There are many factors that should be taken into consideration when debating on what the biggest problems are not only in the justice system but also in the court system, many of them being seen throughout the novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers. For instance, race seems to still be an issue in today’s justice system. One example on how race is a problem in the justice system is on the case of Clarence Brandley. Clarence was realized from jail after being wrongfully convicted and on death row for almost one decade as it states in the Montana Abolition Coalition article. Another problem in the justice system is the death penalty. One reason why the death penalty is a problem is because innocent people can be executed as it also states in the Montana Abolition Coalition article. One final problem out of the many is the the court system is actually the jury. For example as it is stated in the article jurs are supposed to be representative of our diverse community (Ladner,2000).…
- 927 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Although jury nullification has some downsides when it is abused by a biased jury, there are many reasons to support it. Jury nullification helps keep unfair laws in check by allowing them to be bypassed. It is protected by the rights given in the 6th amendment. And it is needed to nullify the law when a person breaks it in order to protect themselves. Jury nullification needs to be legal because it is necessary to the court process.…
- 522 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
To demonstrate and answer some of my unanswered questions Kennedy delivers strong cases that clearly shows that race has the potential to impact trial outcomes, such as the Swain v. Alabama and Batson v. Kentucky cases. It is obvious that the fairness of the criminal justice system has been called into question. I never knew that the justice system history in relations to the peremptory challenge caused disadvantages upon blacks until reading Kennedy’s arguments; my thoughts on the peremptory challenge are that it is unfair because a potential juror’s gender or racial orientation should not be grounds for a peremptory challenge. However, I suggest that the larger issue is that it’s easy for lawyers to hide their motives for discriminating against some groups. Equally important, it’s easy for the courts and lawyers to conceal discriminatory motives for so-called peremptory challenges of prospective jurors. The courts have failed to gain recognition and rejection of the practice of excluding blacks from the jury: First by the composition of the jury panels and second in the use of peremptory challenges to remove blacks who reach the panels from which the jury is…
- 489 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Each argument has a great amount of strong facts and opinions to support them as well as multiple of reasons. After thorough research to my belief about race based jury nullification should not be should not be conducted by jurors. As a whole we are not opposed to jury nullification, but when race is a factor we are opposed to nullification. By any means community unity is not promoted by race based jury nullification. Simply this thought process is based on discrimination and simply racial; as a society we are trying to help educate and show everyone how any racial based ideas can be very negative. It does not mean that races should not promote what they stand for and should not be proud of who they are, but when a jury finds a defendant innocent and/or guilty because of race alone is a major problem. What jurors need to base his or her verdicts is on information, facts, and evidence presented to them throughout a trial; not on racial biased opinions that need to be left…
- 738 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict that is the opposite of what the jury believes or the verdict it was instructed to return by the court” (Rottenstein Law Group, 2014). In the course of a regular criminal trial, the judge will hand down some directives to the jury. The judge will inform the jury that they should set aside any feelings that they may take personal and achieve a decision exclusively in light of the truth displayed at trial. However, juries overlook these directions and clear criminals who plainly disobeyed the law. Current lawful guidelines firmly disapproval jury nullification and restrict encouragements for a jury panel to nullify the law. Therefore, a legal counselor may not, even with the within the…
- 225 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Majority of the times setting criminals free to commit the same crimes again. Being acquitted of all charges is usually how jury nullifications occur. Many believe that racial nullification should be possible for those that have committed non-violent crimes even if the evidence shows that the person is in fact guilty. The contribution to the criminal justice system is that this would allow the prison system to have more space for those that commit more violent crimes regardless of their race. As we see jury nullification can either be beneficial or it can truly destroy the criminal justice system. Courtrooms need to recognize that there needs to be no biases within the system or people need to be blindfolded before being a part of a case. There needs to be a model set forth in regards to the influence that justice should outweigh any feelings in regards to race and one should serve time for the crime that they was convicted of. African American, or Hispanic or minorities races apply society ought to come close to their effort and be aware of its supporting nature and their choice to practice their authority in benefit of their…
- 1091 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Just like how police officers and prosecutors can make discretionary decision; Jury nullification is simply a power granted to jury to make discretion regarding whether criminal punishment is appropriate in a given case. Just as police and prosecutors take into consideration as whether the defendant’s behavior was a technical violation or whether other circumstances not recognized by the law justified or excused a defendant’s actions; it serves jury nullification to get rid of inappropriate prosecutions where police and prosecutors failed to do so. So when critics criticize jury nullification without knowing that similar judgments are being made by police officers and prospectors, people who have such bias view don't even realize their argument…
- 135 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Internet research clearly showed a long history for jury nullification in the US. An explanation of jury nullification, and in particular race based jury nullification, is that it is a method whereby juries nullify unfair laws by declaring guilty defendants not guilty. Race based nullification is where a jury acquits and individual based on their race. This is commonly found in homogenous juries where there is little jury diversity. Past cases such as runaway slave laws and current cases such as police shootings show that race-based nullification is still an issue in modern courtrooms. The conclusion being that jury nullification is an important power necessary for the checks and balances of the judicial system…
- 1234 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The definition of jury nullification according to thefreedictionary.com website jury nullification is defined as a sanctioned doctrine wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the instructions of the judge in order to reach a verdict based upon their own consciences. It espouses the concept that jurors should be the judges of both law and fact. The doctrine of jury nullification is based one important things, one that a juror can never be punished for the verdict they bring back to the judge, and second that a defendant cannot ever be retried once the jury has returned to the courtroom with a not guilty verdict.…
- 1103 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Ethnicity plays a big role in courtroom proceedings as well as judicial practices from all parts of the criminal justice system. It is anywhere from the initial intake of a person to the time the person is sentenced. Everyone involved in the proceeding has to perform certain duties to their highest ability and they have to be fair to everyone that is involved in the court proceedings. If a person is a different race or gender it may not always be the case that the people have to be fair or perform certain duties. There is statistical research that has proven in the past twenty years that there is a…
- 1160 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Arguably, if the State of Florida v. George Zimmerman case was the other way around, State of Florida v. Trayvon Martin, Trayvon Martin would be facing prison time. This is the problem with the courts. I think that the only way to solve this is to have the jurors, and judged blindfolded during cases, this way they couldn’t see what race the defendant is and could possible make it a fair trial, or simply never have the parties present in front of judges or jurors. I believe that if the State of Florida v. George Zimmerman case was done this way, George Zimmerman would have served some time in prison, how is it that this person can get away with murder, when another person in the same situation cannot just because of his or her…
- 662 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The lifetime exclusion of felons from jury service is the majority rule in the U.S., used in thirty one states and in federal courts. The result is that over 6% of the adult population is excluded, including about 30% of black men,[2] creating a class of citizens defined and punished by the criminal justice system but unable to impact its function. Felon jury exclusion is less visible than felony disenfranchisement, and few socio-legal scholars have challenged the statutes that withhold a convicted felon’s opportunity to sit on a jury.[3] While constitutional challenges to felon jury exclusion almost always originate from interested litigants, some scholars contend that "it is the interests of the excluded felons that are most directly implicated." Yet, attacks on these blanket prohibitions levied by excluded felon jurors have failed consistently. The United States Supreme Court does not recognize the right to sit on a jury as fundamental.[4] It has been pointed out that, although lawmakers assert that felon jury exclusion measures protect the integrity of the adjudicative process, as felons “lack the requisite probity” to serve on a jury and are “inherently biased,” many of…
- 747 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
We are told that the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that we have the right to an unbiased jury when it is a felonious trial, but what is considered neutrality? This question has been one that the Supreme Court has asked time and time again, and they have stated “that the jury must be drawn from a representative cross-section of the community” (Taylor v. Louisiana, 1975). In order to “determine unconstitutional exclusion, the court has said that the group must be: A) distinctive B) lacking what they call fair and reasonable representation because of reasons C) caused by the system of jury selection (Duren v. Missouri, 1979). Therefore, this learner thinks the answer to the above question is no. This learner also does not think that African Americans can receive a fair trail with an all-white jury. I know that we all have biases and that even our own color can harbor…
- 1530 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays