Preview

Rachel Ross's Case Against Alpine High School

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
726 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rachel Ross's Case Against Alpine High School
Rachel Ross is bringing suit against Alpine High School and the Principal Nick Ruiz for violating her first amendment right, by barring her publication of an opinion article in the student-run newspaper. Rachel is a senior at Alpine High School who is maintaining a 4.0 GPA, is Vice President of the student body, part of the varsity swim team and debate team, and is a writer for the student-run newspaper. Rachel has never been the subject of any disciplinary action and is a regular attendee of the school’s political conference, which is an open forum that discusses both sides of political issues.
The student body of Alpine High School creates a newspaper called the Sentential that contains various columns including an opinion column named “Our
…show more content…
At several points last semester there were peaceful protests which interrupted classes, but no students were harmed. Sometime after the protests, a fellow student at Alpine High School wrote a one-sided article called “It’s Time to Dump Trump” in which he explained in a detailed manner the failings of President Trump in his opinion. He stated that Trump was an “ignorant, unstable, racist, misogynistic, narcissist who has degraded the once esteemed position of president”. In response to the student’s article, Rachel wrote the “Truth about Trump” where she strives to fill in the gaps that “It’s Time to Dump Trump” left and educate her classmates on the successes of the Trump administration. Both articles near the end have a call to action. The other student wrote, “we cannot allow President Trump to continue to denigrate not only for our democratic institutions but us the American people” he states that “it is time for action, for resistance and yes even revolution if it comes to it.” In the “Truth about Trump” Rachel states that, “We must be vigilant in protecting our country and willing to do whatever is necessary to fight back against those who seek to see President Trump and America fail” she also states that “true Americans do not cower but take the fight directly to the enemy.” Both similar in their demands, the key difference is one article was published and one was not. Principle Ruiz stated that …show more content…
Rodgers to never publish Rachel’s article. He stated that Rachel’s article was not in line with the school’s message of supporting the student body, community, and country. He said her information was credible, but her viewpoint was controversial and would incite violence among the student population if published. Whereas in the article “It’s time to Dump Trump” he stated that its content supported the school’s role in helping students come to terms with the reality of the situation, stating that the article called for unity and rejection of hate, while Rachel’s called for division. Principal Ruiz makes it a point to point out the language and the call for action in Rachel’s article but never mentions the language nor call for action in the other student's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tyler Chase Harper, a high school sophomore, was sent to the principal’s office for violating the dress code. He was wearing a T-shirt which contained statements that disparaged the homosexual community. Chase filed suit in federal court claiming that the school violated his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion, as well as rights protected by the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses under the federal Constitution and the California Civil Code.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2014, The Princeton Tory published an article written by, then freshman, Tal Fortgang (Fortgang 1). In the article, Fortgang asserts that opinions on the Princeton campus are often stifled, “Solely on the basis of the person that voiced them” (Fortgang 1). Moreover, he accuses the people who tell him to “‘Check your privilege’” (Fortgang 1) of, “Diminishing everything [he] [has] personally accomplished” (Fortgang 1). Fortgang’s central theme is that his “privilege” was earned by his family, through countless hardships and many years of suffering. In the following month, a dissenting article written by “classmate” (Payton 1) Briana Payton was published by Time magazine. Payton, who subscribes to a political ideology opposite that of Fortgang,…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A seventeen-year old student at Central High School in Bristol, Virginia by the name of Suzie sent her boyfriend, Cyrus, inappropriate photographs of herself. Once the relationship ended Cyrus sent the photographs to upperclassmen boys at their high school. The boys are now noticing Suzie for ways that both Suzie as well as her parents are not okay with. To attempt to eliminate the problem Suzie’s parents included Mrs. Sheevers, the school Principal, in the problem. After Cyrus denied the accusation of sending out the photographs to other boys, Mrs. Sheevers commanded the school officer to search Cyrus’ phone for any trace of the pictures. Not finding the phone, the principal then searched Cyrus’ school locker where she found the phone with the pictures on it. In response to this Cyrus was then suspended for two weeks. Although the Virginia Statehouse Court and the Federal District Courts verdict was that the Bristol School District is not guilty, the appeal at the Supreme Court granted Cyrus a…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I, _______, agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students, or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes, we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely, but most students are minors and are under the supervision of the school. The school has the right to control what is allowed within its walls and must moniter students' doings in order to ensure the safety and eduaction of all students.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josh Renville, an 18 year old student attending Fargo North High School has petitioned against the school in question for violating his first amendment right to freedom of speech. The school prohibited Renville from using a photograph in which he his holding his favorite rifle for his senior portrait in the yearbook. Renville claims that by prohibiting the photograph, the school is infringing on his rights to freedom of symbolic speech. Despite Renville’s claims, the actions taken by the administrators at Fargo North High were completely constitutional. Fargo North was acting well within their constitutional limits to promote the ideals of public education, to properly monitor any media that would have been associated with the school, and to limit any action that inherently interfered with the school’s disciplinary…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bristol School Case Study

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This brief is in regards to the Bristol School District and their policies. A seventeen-year old student, Suzie, attended Central High School in Bristol, Virginia. During Suzie’s relationship with her boyfriend, Cyrus, she sent him some very revealing photographs of herself. After their relationship ended, Cyrus forwarded some of the most revealing photos to upper classmen in the school. This began to draw unwanted attention to Suzie. It became such a disruption in the school, Suzie’s parents contacted the school principal, Mrs. Sheevers, and forced her to investigate and appeal the situation thoroughly. Principal Sheevers, then confronted Cyrus, who denied having and sending the photographs. Then Principal Sheevers sent the school’s security officer to find Cyrus’s phone to check it for the photographs. When Cyrus didn’t have his…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald Trump’s call to “Make America Great Again” has polarized the nation, and is a very current and relevant example of corruption and violence infecting a modern revolution. Although unlike his liberal counterpart Bernie Sanders he hasn’t actually called for a “political revolution,” Donald Trump’s radical policies would be just as much of a departure from traditional American politics. He calls for the deportation of millions of illegal immigrants, a wall on the Mexican border, a ban on Muslims, and for companies based elsewhere to bring their jobs back to the United States. Ever since Trump gained the national spotlight he has been criticized for his Trump University scam and inciting violence among his supporters. When Trump University…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Them” mentality and alienating the implied arguer. Using phrases such as “published by our people” draws a greater following. She writes with this tone to induce compassion and reinforce the theme of unity with the underprivileged minorities of the time. Despite using only phrases, she creates a microsimulation of hypotheticals to strengthen her argument “it is … us “(lines 29-39). By stimulating and provoking more writers and hate, she creates a win-win situation for herself. If people support her, she wins, and, if they do not, then the article is further strengthened by predicting the behavior of the opponent. This is an effective tool used in modern times including the current President’s pre-election double-binds. Thus, justifying necessity of her writing is effectively pursued and executed using these…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talked about how the students of UC Berkeley were protesting against a speech being given at their school, and how the sponsors of this group were forced to pay $15,000 in security fees. Then on top of that fee the school paid an additional $600,000 to create cemented barriers and have armed forces on campus during the meeting. Personally I feel these precautions were unnecessary however due to the way students were reacting it had to be done. Another subject brought up in the article was the fact that 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect "hate speech", 51 percent said that they would be in favor of students speaking out against a speaker "known for making offensive and hurtful statements" and 19 percent of students said the use of violence against controversial speakers is acceptable. This information frustrates me because freedom of speech is black and white, personal opinions shouldn’t interfere with our rights.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having read the comments on the discussion forum, the head teacher has asked you to write an article for the school newsletter about the school closure explaining why the school remained closed during the recent bad weather. The article also needs to include what action will be taken in the future to prevent further closure.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas in "A Letter Home" it says, "Some young people burned the ROTC building on campus and set some bonfires downtown. I heard that police cars were hit with bottles and store windows were broken"(2) They did not peacefully protest. They automatically asserted to violence. Another difference between the protestors in “A Letter Home’ and in “Waiting for Dan” is that in “Waiting for Dan” the protesters stood up for their rights by doing Freedom Rides. They are also protesting something that is happening in the United states. This is shown when “A group of African Americans whites would board buses and ride through the southern state’(4) Whereas in “A Letter Home” they are protesting something across the country. For example, “Many students were outraged when they heard that U.S soldiers invaded Cambodia on April 30th”(2). The protesters did not take any action to participate in helping to try to get the soldiers out of Cambodia. Instead they just got furious and violent. In my final analysis, both stories are similar to each other yet different in a few…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SCMB wanted to publish an article in the university’s paper the Innovator; the newspaper is supported by student fees. The Dean of Student Affairs, Patricia Carter, has to review stories before they are printed for the newspaper. At this time Hosty’s article was requested to be redone and asked to change the wording. Hosty article was never denied, she was asked to revise the article, and filed a suit stating SCMB’s First Amendment rights were violated when Mrs. Carter requested for the article to be revised. Mrs. Carter claimed that school newspapers were not a "forum for public expression," and authorized the prior restraint exercised by the administrator "so long as [his] actions [were] reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns (Healy,…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cold War Liberal Consensus

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The rise of protests in the early 1960s became more radical in the middle of the decade. Colleges nationwide saw a growing number of anti-war protests, some of which became violent and more radical in the late 1960s. These protests sparked a chain of events for domestic and foreign policies of the United States. “Berkeley equals Mississippi equals Vietnam” was an equation that really led to many doubts if…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deaf President Now Essay

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In today’s world, the fact that a student protest was held is not so surprising. Even then, mainstream America was used to seeing student’s protesting just about anything and everything. The universities and colleges of this country are known to be a place where students can learn about the world and free speech and how to use it in modern society. Some of the most significant civil rights protests of the 20th century may have started off-campus but they caught their momentum on campuses all across America. Most recently, President Obama’s 2008 campaign was significant in that it utilized social media and really spoke to the under-30 population utilizing college-aged idealists to push his message and work the campaign. What made the DPN protest significant was it was the first time…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays