Radical Criminology

The first topic that stood out to me was Contemporary critical thought. “While all criminology is based on a conflict premise, it has become considerably more diverse over the past two decades, incorporating “a growing multiplicity of critical theoretical approaches” (Michalowiski, 1996:13). The top three important contemporary critical streams are left realism, feminism, and postmodernism. Radical criminologist highlighted certain crimes over the years that target poor people. These crimes are called “suite crimes” also known as “white-collar crimes”. These crimes can range from embezzlement, inside trading, and the abuse of power against poor people. Over the years people have been ignoring the fact that street crimes have enough a major issue and has been reported to the Uniform Crime Report. “Walter DeKeseredy and Martin Schwartz (1991) suggest that left realism has failed to develop as thoroughly in
the United States because of (1) the marginalization loft socialist thought in America and (2) the failure to establish a dominant center of radical criminological theory at American universities (Brown). There are two leaders from the British left realism John Lea and Jockey Young. The two have come to the conclusion that street crimes has been a serious crime for the working class, they also feel that the crimes happening against the working is happening by other working class members. The assumption from the conclusion allows one to understand that not only can one be victimized by the rich and powerful, but can also be victimized by their neighbors who are in the same working class.
2.
The second topic that stood out to me was the radical era – 1960’s and 1970’s/ Austin Turks—Genocide and the legal order.
“Turk focused on the definition of various crimes. “In his 1969 publication, Criminality and legal order, he wrote that “[n]othing and no one is intrinsically criminal; criminality is a definition of fly by individuals with the power to do so, according to a legal or extra-legal, as well as legal criteria” (Turk, 1969:10). Search understood that one label status of comfort is likely to be subordinate to one’s power. Took notice that one person’s commit crimes, when should be accountable for their actions through volds golds group of one’s conflict theory. The definitions behind proposition two & three have slaves in the videos of criminals. Preposition four helps with social theory has the ability to interact with others and one’s social behaviors. William Chambliss and Robert Seidman- Law, order and power. William and Robert felt that law could represent the power of the society and that law very well serves the best interest in modern
society.
3.
The final topic that stood out to me was the roots of criminal criminology. “The conflict perspective posits that society is composed of groups that have opposing values and interests and that the state represents the values and interests of the groups with the most power” (Brown) Karl Marx—Conflict theory, Marx wondered if the features of many societies where people would develop the mode of production. Marx stated that the police, courts, and prisons have the intents on possibly controlling the status quo. Group Conflict perspective, George Vold- Group conflict theory. “Youth gangs are in large part a result of intergenerational conflict, which adults are destined to win, given their control of the legal apparatus “Brown”.