Furthermore, in my opinion, there are two parts to moral rectitude. The first is standing up for what someone believes in. In other words, a person is willing to take action on what they think is right. However, this philosophy alone poses a major problem. Believing in something is fine, but why should others agree with it? What makes what someone else believes in “more right” than someone else’s? Just because something sounds good on paper is not enough to assert that it should be acted upon. Here is where the second part of moral rectitude can be applied. Morrison’s quote, answers that “why” question. It is because it is “what ought to be done” and because that individual knows that if they did not act, then nothing would change. Having said this, my interpretation of Morrison’s philosophy can be applied to when and when not to be a
Furthermore, in my opinion, there are two parts to moral rectitude. The first is standing up for what someone believes in. In other words, a person is willing to take action on what they think is right. However, this philosophy alone poses a major problem. Believing in something is fine, but why should others agree with it? What makes what someone else believes in “more right” than someone else’s? Just because something sounds good on paper is not enough to assert that it should be acted upon. Here is where the second part of moral rectitude can be applied. Morrison’s quote, answers that “why” question. It is because it is “what ought to be done” and because that individual knows that if they did not act, then nothing would change. Having said this, my interpretation of Morrison’s philosophy can be applied to when and when not to be a