HORNELL, N.Y. (WENY) -- Police arrested two people for allegedly selling drugs on school property.…
As an administrator, I would refrain from searching the students’ belongings or even their pockets. Instead, I would call the suspected students in for questioning. I would offer a small reward (non-monetary) to any student(s) who…
First and foremost, irregular locker searches help to reduce violence and drug use in schools. Randomized locker searches help to find any weapons or drugs being hidden by student in lockers. THe searches can help to save lives, if there is a weapon found. If it is suspected that the student id breaking a law, or even school rule, a locker search may be carried out to see if the allegations are true.…
Is it unlawful for an agency to permit random searches to take place of students’ clothes, backpacks, lockers, and desks?…
- a school official may properly conduct a search of student’s person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline or enforce school policies.”…
When it comes to random student locker searches, I feel that all teachers have the responsibility to give any information that they may have concerning any illegal acts that their students are involved in. If this information leads to the administration searching that student’s locker, then it is being done to make sure all the students are being kept safe. I do not feel that anyone’s locker should be searched without a significant amount of proof or suspicion. It should not be done just because the student is considered a trouble maker. Though a student may be breaking the law or rules of the school, I feel that the student still has the right to have their privacy protected. When searching the locker, I feel that some discretion needs to be taken. Allowing the student body to know why and when another student’s locker is being searched would be, in my opinion, considered an infringement on their privacy. I feel that all of the students rights should always be protected. It goes with the old rule of thumb, innocent until proven guilty. Even when found guilty, the rights of the students should still be protected, but only to the extent that it maintains the safety of the student body. For example, if nothing is found during the search, not only could this be embarrassing to the student, it could also be an embarrassment to the school administration. On the other hand, if a gun were to be found in the student’s locker, then that student would not have the right to just leave the school. Their rights would be limited in order to keep the rest of the students safe.…
they just don't know think it's worth it to bring drugs, alchol, or firearms into schools ( Robinson 3). This shows that having drug dogs will lessen the chances of kids bringing any non-appropraite items to school. Lastly using drug dogs for searches sends a clear message to students and the community that schools are drug/gunfree zone. "I may not be able to control what students do off school property, but I do not want parents or students to fear that they will be in class with other students who are under the influence (Robinson)". This evidence suggests that schools and the administration want the public to know that schools are a drug free zone and they will try and keep it that…
Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…
The purpose of this paper is assess the limits search and seizure in public schools, apply specific ruling, analyze the New Jersey v. T.L.O. case and explain, recommend changes to existing (specific) laws to create a fairer educational setting in terms of search and seizure and peer review. School officials are responsible for providing a safe and orderly school environment. The officials are required to address disrupting or unsafe behavior that violate school policy and rules. It may require searching of students and their belongings. Dealing with disrupted behavior is a difficult situation that requires decision-making on when, where and how to conduct a search and seizure. My assess limit search and seizure is on hunch or just general search. School officials must have reasonable or proper cause to search.…
To them, it protects students rather then invading their privacy. Going through student's things doesn't ensure safety, it makes them not trust school authority. Others believe that students can't be trusted with bags in school. Again, this causes students to not trust advisors at school. If administrators want students to trust them, they shouldn't search their things without their permission. Limitations on student's Fourth Amendment rights are inexcusable.…
The lockers have been given to the students expecting them to take care of it and being responsible over it. What is the need to go through it? I have been given a locker since sixth grade and never once has a teacher much less a principle gone through my locker. If they were to go through my locker it would make me feel like i'm a suspect for something I have no connection with.On our way into school each day student’s book bags are checked each day. There have even been instances in which the security guards have taken over an hour to go through the student's belongings, while teachers, administrators and principals go through without being checked not only is it hypocritical but unjust. Teenagers should be given the benefit of the doubt. I have been present in an event where a teacher unjustifiably read his messages out loud after his phone rang in class without him even having it in his hands. It wasn't in the teacher’s responsibility nor authority to go through his messages much less reveal his messages.We are called the next generation yet we are restricted to are given liberty's by others insecurities. If people can't practice what they preach then they should change their speech. I would rather be considered a rebellious teenager than a lying hypocrite.Trust has become nothing but a blur and a silver lining with perseption, perseption is all that they can see in the end of the…
According to redalertpolitics.com, there is an average of 7 incidents in the United States from weapons that result in an automatic expulsion. Students also bring drugs to sell or to have for themselves to keep in their locker during the school day. Drug dogs are commonly used by police to search for drugs in schools, but what if the dog has a cold and can’t sniff anything out that day? These are real life issues that some people face and are quite alarming. There may be one solution, though, for sick drugs dogs; you can always check the video camera for any suspicion before you claim someone tolerated a school…
I believe that search and seizure is very important for our country and our rights. Search and Seizure helps to protect our fourth amendment right, which is the right to privacy. The Search and seizure says that law enforcement cannot search or put anyone under arrest unless they have evidence to support that action (Murray). I believe that search and seizure is important to protecting our privacy rights. If police so not have any evidence against you, that they can’t search you, your car your house or anything.…
If students start rebelling, the school will lose a lot of good players and participants. Either they will quit or their parents will take them out, because not only are the kids being put on display but their families as well. By losing an abundance of participants or players the school will get a bad reputation. Sports and academics are the two most important things at our school. As small of a thing as taking random drug tests is, it could mess up the order of the school.…
Without suspicion of drug use, schools cannot require drug tests of athletes, because it violates their Fourth Amendment right. According to the US Bill Of Rights: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.” (Cayton). This means that you need probable cause or suspicion of drug use before you can require a drug test of someone. School athletes should not be subject to unjust searches based on non-existent evidence. The searches would be both unlawful and unreasonable thus making the policy unconstitutional. Nevertheless, there are many people who oppose this policy, and believe that student-athlete drug testing is needed to protect the common good and ensure the safety of everyone (Mikula). However, no policy should be able to violate the constitution and infringe on the student’s privacy. An example of this is from a court case involving a Texas School District. The Texas School argued that they needed a policy to test student-athletes for drugs to help control the “drug crisis” going on at their school.…