The Labeling theory works on the basis that when dealing with crime, the behavior is not as important as the reaction to said behavior (the label). This implies that the way society reacts to the behavior will dictate whether or not it is deviant or better yet whether or not a person is "labeled" a criminal or deviant. The theory goes even further to say that if a behavior occurs and there is no reaction to the behavior then there is no deviance. This would contend that if a person was to commit murder and no one was to find out then he is not a murder. Of course in the latter example, he is a murder but he does not have the label affix to him as being a murder or even a criminal therefore, society does not perceive him as such. This theory holds that if a person commits a act and we consider that act to be deviant then the person committing that act is a deviant; Even further, by labeling them a deviant we have just now increased there chances for further deviance and as such watch them even closer for said further deviance. This is true however, if they committed a deviant act are they not deviant? If they killed somebody are they not murders? If they stole from somebody are they not thieves? And as such should we not pay closer attention to them to protect ourselves and our families from them. One indication that society agrees with this point, can be seen by the national sex offenders' registry and Megan's law which requires sex offender to register when they come into a new community. This registry is a shining example of the good and bad policy implications of this theory.
The registry is way for the community to protect themselves against sex offenders; however, once a person is labeled a sex offender their lives are ruined. Once labeled a sex offender people dislike individuals on the sole basis of the label, thus making it difficult to have friends, get jobs or even to walk down the street without people watching them. This can even be seen in prisons. A person who is convicted of murder has more respect than a person convicted of sexual molestation. In this case, the label has become the punishment and some may say that they deserve it; however, what happens when the person is falsely labeled. Also, our system says that if you commit a crime you do the time, but once labeled a sex offender you will always be labeled a sex offender, so when do they finish paying for the crime? Other policy implication can readily be seen in the juvenile justice system. Theorist held that if you process a juvenile through the system then a label would be applied to them, thus they began using diversionary programs to avoid this label. The problem created with this is that more juveniles were actually now being processed, since police officers before had only two options with dealing with juveniles. Either they were going to arrest them and send them through the juvenile justice system or release them. With the development of diversionary programs this just gave police officers an additional option which normally affected those juveniles who would normally have been released.
The major problem with the theory is that it never explained why the original act took place. This is to say that had the person never commit the first act they would not, unless wrongly accused, have ever been labeled in the first place. Thus the label reflects them in a sense or at least was affix due to a decision of their own making. Another problem is that it fails to explain crime true cause for crime. Take for instance secret deviants, these individuals are not labeled as deviants yet they still commit crimes. Why? The theory does not adequately explain them and if nothing else the lack thereof a label may in turn truly be the cause or at least part of it.
Rational choice theory is very different to the labeling theory. The Rational choice theory is one of the rational theories and, as such, contends that humans have free will and commit crimes for many reasons. Rational choice theory contends that humans are selfish by nature and commit crimes where the benefits outweigh the punishment. This in turn explains the majority of society who do not commit crimes. Why would people go to work everyday to acquire money if they could otherwise steal it? They work because if caught and sent to jail for stealing to acquire quick easy money versus working without the risk of punishment for slower money seems more rational and the punishment does not outweigh the benefit. This theory contends that individuals also make rational decision about what crimes to commit and how do them. This point can be seen by the amount of people who rob gas stations as opposed to banks. While, the pay off for robbing a bank is greater than that of a gas station the punishment and risk is also greater (i.e. longer sentence, armored guard, FBI investigates, etc). Rational choice theory calls for criminal behavior to be explained by many factors such as environment, economic situation, family structures, values, etc. and provides for policy implication that provide for prevention and for harsher punishments.
Under this theory, punishing people for their crime is ok because they should have known better and they are getting what they deserve. This is at least one of the major purposes of the criminal justice system today (punishment). People are sentence to death for killing other people and its ok because they should not have killed those people (according to this theory). What other purpose does it serve besides punishment? Therefore, people will commit fewer crimes because it would seem irrational to commit the crimes given the punishment. The only problem is that people do not always make decision that seem rational to other people or, better stated, the action seemed rational to that person at the time of the action. This is seen by the fact that people may kill in the heat of passion and while they did chose to kill they were not, however in the eyes of most making a rational decision.
So, while both of these have their problems labeling theory clearly has more and rational choice theory when accompanied by routine activity theory and lifestyle theory is a much better explanation of crime.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Assess the view that crime and deviance are the products of the labelling process (21 marks)…
- 706 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the view that crime and deviance are the product of using labelling processes (21 marks)…
- 810 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Essay question: Assess the usefulness of the labelling theory in explaining crime and deviance. (33 marks)…
- 916 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Howard Becker’s labeling theory starts off by identifying the deviant. Once you get caught doing something, you are identified and labeled for it; it can either be formal as labeled under the law or informal as in labeled with in family and friends. For example, I had two very good friends in high school, Serafin and Brian. They were best buds and always did everything together. Like many teenagers in high school they started to experiment with drugs. Like every other day they would both go smoke weed and get high in the alley afterschool. No one ever walked through the alley unless you were doing drugs or something but that day the police were roaming around the block because a robber had broke into someone’s house, Serafin and Brian happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The cops drove through the alley and had seen both of them smoking, their first reaction was to run but where? When there wasn’t anywhere to run, it was a dead end. So they quickly jumped tried to jump the fence while Brian jumped the fence successfully and got to runaway, Serafin wasn’t so fortunate and ended up getting his pants stuck to the fence. As soon as Serafin got arrested he was immediately identified and labeled. As for Brian he didn’t get caught and never got labeled even though he was there and performing the same deviant actions as Serafin.…
- 1243 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This theory also explains how labeling these indivudal and them becoming an outcast can affect the behaviors. This theory is to point out how social rproccesses of labeling and treating someoneas criminally deviant actually fosters deviant behavior and has a negative repercussion for that person because other are likely to be bias toward the offender because of the…
- 700 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The labeling theory believes that crime is socially constructed. This theory states that there is a primary deviance, which occurs in childhood. As a result of this act of deviance, these children are labeled by the justice system. Secondary deviance occurs after this label is accepted/internalized by the child. This theory would explain O.J. Simpson’s crime as a result of society and a result of his childhood deviance. They would look at Simpson’s childhood and see that “at age 13, he joined a gang called the Persian Warriors ("O.J. Simpson Biography").” While involved in this gang he got in a fight that resulted in him having to join a Youth program. This would be considered the primary deviance. Every deviant behavior following that is a secondary deviance that is a result of him accepting the label, criminal, given to him as a child. This theory is similar to that of the self-control theory because they both see earlier childhood development as a point where deviance is rooted. They are different in the way that the labeling theory sees the start of crime as an actual act of deviance, while the self-control theory believes it started with poor parental…
- 560 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Crime is bad behavior displayed by citizens who reject societal norms and instead chose to commit crime. However, there are many types of theories of why crime occurs the most prevalent cause for crime involves the social environment of the criminal offender. Psychological theories discusses that these interruptions in childhood development is the cause for crime but because the delays developmental is the effect of the criminal’s environment. The same goes for biological theories that find genetic or biological factors that make a person more prone to become a criminal but require certain environmental factors for the person in reality to become a criminal.…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Some say labelling is not a ‘theory’ because it does not give an explanation of law, but questions why we have such rules. For Labelling theorists there is no such thing as crime, as we create the laws and punishments by defining certain acts to be deviant. Deviant means to depart from usual or accepted standards. Leading theorist Kitsuse said “it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of society which identify and interpret behaviour as deviant which sociology transforms persons into deviants”. This means that it is not the actions themselves that are crimes…
- 4485 Words
- 18 Pages
Best Essays -
The Labelling theory addresses a larger definition of crime, referring not only to illegal conduct or actions but much rather to deviant behaviour in general. Deviance is seen as a quality attributed to a certain act by those who witness it directly or indirectly and deem it immoral and wrong. Behaviours acquire the label of being deviant by social interaction and maintain it by social learning. This new approach is in contradiction with the former views of crime as inherent to the action or behaviour and in some cases excusable by the circumstances such as anomie or social strain, which assume homogenous norms and equal responses or punishments to all those guilty.…
- 600 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Crime theories can vary greatly. A lot of people think that poverty or social status is a major factor on criminal behavior. Others believe that is embedded in human beings to be born with evil therefore we are attracted to crime. Bottom line is deterrence cannot be achieved unless the underlining cause for criminal behavior is found.…
- 1359 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
During the 1960’s and 70’s the labelling theory was seen as the main sociological theory of crime. Throughout this period Howard Becker was one of the most prominent advocates of the…
- 1985 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Marsh, I., Melville G., Norris G., Morgan K., Walkington, Z. (2006). Theories of Crime. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd. P125.…
- 2514 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
Within criminal justice Labelling Theory has been seen as a way of manipulating and encouraging both the would be offender to think and behaviours in a particular way so as to live up to the label and equally to manipulate and direct the thoughts and actions of those that work and manage the system e.g. a label encourages them to takes on particular negative perspective or bias towards a person or group of people. This essay will focus on describing all aspects of Labelling Theory in relation to crime and the criminal justice system. It will also evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Labelling Theory which dominated sociological theory of crime and thinking in the 1960’ and 70’s.…
- 1659 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Goode, E. (2008) Out of control: Assessing the general theory of crime Stanford University Press. Ca. USA…
- 2084 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Critical perspectives on crime differ from other perspectives in that they focus on ways people and institutions respond to crime and criminals. Critical perspectives are often called social reaction theories. The different theories covered under critical perspectives include Labeling theory, Conflict and radical theory and feminist theory. Labeling theory states that deviance is not the act itself that a person commits; a deviant label will lead us to be more deviant. Labeling theory is one of the most significant perspectives in the study of criminology. Amongst these theories is the labeling theory which is one of the most significant theories studied. Labeling theory adopts a relativist’s definition, by assuming that nothing about a…
- 1452 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays