Preview

Rationalism and justification of knowledge in Rene Descartes

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4236 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rationalism and justification of knowledge in Rene Descartes
1.0 Introduction Over the years, the nature of reality, knowing, thinking and believing has constituted puzzling issues which epistemology attempts to grapple with. Issues cutting across what can we know, what is the nature and scope of human knowledge, what can be known with certainty, how do we acquire knowledge, how can we know what is when we come across it, what can be left to faith or opinion to decide, as well as the proper source of knowledge preoccupied the philosophical and at the same time, the epistemological thought of philosophers. In this connection, different schools of thought have come to limelight notably among them are scepticism, rationalism, and empiricism.
For instance, scepticism poses a problem by arguing that knowledge is impossible, that we cannot know anything for sure. To resolve this issue, rationalism puts forward that the process of reasoning is the surest path to knowledge, whereas empiricism says that knowledge is acquired through sense experience. But, “is knowledge actually got through sense experience?” or “is it acquired through the process of reasoning?” or perhaps, is it impossible for us to know? These questions arise owing to the fact that our claims to knowledge are in need of justification for they are challenged by scepticism; doubts about our knowledge claims and doubts about the evidences that support our knowledge claims.
It is in recognition of this that Rene Descartes entitled his magnus opus the Discourse on Method and Meditations. And it is also the reason why he insisted that reason is the ultimate court of appeal whereby our knowledge claims can come to rest and, in fact, be justified. In the light of the foregoing, this essay shall bring to center-stage rationalism and the justification of knowledge in Rene Descartes. To do this, this essay shall pay attention to the basic tenets of rationalism, Descartes’ viewpoint on rationalism and the justification of knowledge, and rationalism beyond Descartes. This



Bibliography: Bernstein, Richard J., Beyond Objectivism and Objectivism; Science, Hermeneutics and Praxis. Philadelpia: University of Pennysylvania Press, 1988 Cardinal, D., Hayward, J., & Jones, G., Epistemology: The Theory of Knowledge. London: John Murray Publishers Ltd., 2004. Descartes, Rene. Discourse on Method and Meditations. Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1968. Dunphy, William. History of Western Philosophy. New York: Collier Books, 1976. Haldane, Elizabeth S. and Ross, G.R.T (eds), Philosophical Works of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. Jimoh, Anselm K., Certitude and Doubt A study Guide in Epistemology. Ibadan: Ebony Books & Kreations, 2013. Omoregbe, Joseph. A simplified History of Western Philosophy. Lagos: Joja Educational Research and Publishers Limited, 1991. Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983. -------- History of Western Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1996. Stumpf, Samuel Enoch. Philosophy History and Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994. Toulmin, Stephen. Human Understanding, vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972. Uduigwomen, A.F., and Ozumba, G.O., A Concise Introduction to Philosophy and Logic. Calabar: Centaur Publishers, 1995. Uduma, Uduma Oji. The Fundamentals of Philosophy. Abakaliki: WillyRose and Appleseed publishing Coy, 2000.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, Dew and Foreman discuss some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then discuss the nature of knowledge itself. They consider questions such as, “What do we mean when we say we know something?” “What exactly is knowledge?…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * P. 10 What are the kinds of issues that raise epistemological concerns? HOW WE ACQUIRE OUR BELIEFS, WHAT WE BELIEVE IS TRUE, WHETHER WE BELIEVE RATIONALLY, WHETHER WE OUGHT TO RECONSIDER BELIEFS THAT HAVE BEEN CRITICIZED---HOW TO TREAT CLAIMS PURPOSED FOR OUR ACCEPTANCE, HOW TO HANDLE IDEAS OPPOSITE OF OUR OWN BELIEFS---…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many individuals deserving of praise and admiration. These individuals were all admirable in their own regard. One of the most significant of these individuals was Rene Descartes. Rene Descartes was an admirable individual due to his contributions to philosophy, his remarkable findings in mathematics, and his explanations of the physical world that are still relevant today. Descartes came up with the philosophical arguments of Cartesian doubt, the Mind-Body problem, and Cartesian certainty. In regards to Mathematics, Descartes discovered numerous principles and theorems that paved the way for future discoveries in mathematics. His most notable findings included Cartesian Coordinates, Cartesian Geometry, and "Discourse on Method". In addition to this, Descartes had numerous explanations of the physical world. His most prominent explanations are the first modern formulation of laws of nature, theory of planetary motion, and the study of reflection and refraction of light.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phi 208 Final Paper

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Epistemology arisen either in defense of or in opposition to certain forms of skepticism. Skepticism is an attitude of doubt and uncertainty as expressed in everyday language and an identifiable school of thought in history ideas. It’s most general sense refers to doubt, disbelief, uncertainty, suspension of judgment, and rejection of knowledge. “We might say, for example, that skepticism is the denial of the existence of any justified true belief, but only when justification is understood as a matter of reason-giving of a particular kind.” (Almeder, 2010) It is the doctrine that true knowledge in a particular area is uncertain and argues that beliefs in something does not justify that an assertion of knowledge on the particular…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes took an extreme skeptical position by asking, “What is impossible to doubt, even when trying to believe that everything is false?” His answer was: "I think, therefore I am"; which is Descartes ' most famous one-liner and is the one that explains his understanding of the dualism argument. The term ‘dualism’ has a variety of uses in the history of thought. In general, the idea is that, for some particular domain, there are two fundamental kinds or categories of things or principles. In the philosophy of mind, dualism is the theory that the mental and the physical or mind and body are, in some sense, radically different kinds of thing. The main discussion about dualism tends to start from the assumption of the reality of a physical world, and then ways of considering arguments for why the mind cannot be treated as simply part of that physical world. According to substance dualism, our minds and our bodies are two distinct substances capable of existing apart. Descartes substance dualism was based in the belief that the universe consisted of two different kinds of substances that he called res extensa (physical things) and res cogitans (thinking things). In other words, the essence of mind is thought while the essence of body is extension. This belief also leads to his assumption that Free Will is self-evident. In other words, if one is capable of doubting the existence of things learned through experience even when some of these may be true, then it is obvious that we have the freedom to disbelieve, thus free will.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern Epistemology In the book, “Amusing Ourselves to Death,” by Neil Postman, he poses the idea that the medium is essential “because of the way it directs us to organize our minds and integrate our experience of the world, it imposes itself on our consciousness and social institutions in myriad forms” (Postman 18). In the 31 years since this book was written modern epistemology has evolved beyond what Postman could have envisioned. Postman’s definition of epistemology was that it “is a complex and usually opaque subject concerned with the origins and nature of knowledge” (Postman 17). To further define the word epistemology it is “the branch of philosophy that studies the nature of knowledge, its presuppositions and foundations, and its extent and…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a scientific realist’s perspective, the scientific pursuit of truth further gives rise to genuine knowledge of the natural world, thus entailing epistemic realism and accordingly yielding the knowledge of truth about the objective reality investigated by scientists (Sankey, 2008). Epistemic realism characterises scientific realism, insisting that scientific knowledge is not restricted to the observational level, but also unobservable aspects of reality as well. On the contrary, contemporary versions of constructive empiricist deny the possibility of having rationally justified belief or knowledge about unobservable aspects of the world (Sankey,…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moore, B. Philosophy | Glossary. Online Learning Centre. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, ……2002. Web. 12 Nov. 2011. <http://highered.mcgraw-……hill.com/sites/076742011x/student_view0/chapter6/glossary.html>.>………….…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs Aristotle

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the 17th and 18th century two philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, arose carving for themselves a trench in the philosophical world. We can see the biggest distinction between the two in their theories of how we know things exist. The traditions of Plato and Aristotle have been dubbed rationalism and empiricism respectively. Under these traditions many well known philosophers have formed their own theories of God, existence and the material world. Through these individual theories I will show how each fits into the category of either Rationalist or Imperialist. The Plutonian philosophers to be discussed will include Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. And the Aristotelian philosophers will include Locke, Berkeley and Hume.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes vs Hume

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    René Descartes realized that many of the things that he have accepted as the truth was false opinions, and consequentially the principles that were built upon them. He wanted to start anew by try to find out “the truth”, and then build upon that, because the foundation of science requires absolute certainty. In his attempt to find “the truth,” he started to criticize all of the things he had formally believed: applying the method of doubts, and then remove from the foundation what he found to be doubtable or deducible. He did this as he believed as his doubt increase, certainty decrease and vice versa. By the end of Meditation I, he was in a state called “Abyss,” where he was skeptical of all things and decided that the empirical world was presented to him by an evil demon He then reasoned that for him to be deceived by the demon, he must exist as something, a mind or a thinking thing…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Skepticism

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Immanuel Kant argued that although human knowledge comes from experience, nonetheless knowledge must be grounded in some necessary truths. It is hard to see how the existence of logically and metaphysically necessary truths is enough to ground human knowledge. Following Kant’s reasoning, there are certain types of knowledge we have no access to. I will argue that Presuppositionalism is more plausible than Kant’s skepticism about certain types of knowledge, and that from the Presuppositionalist perspective skepticism is self-refuting. If we don’t assume that God exists, we find that we can’t reach certain conclusions and are left wanting.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rationalism Exam

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. What is Descartes’ most famous conclusion, and why does it make him a rationalist?…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skepticism: In epistemology, the view that varies between doubting all assumptions until proved and claiming that no knowledge is possible.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schommer-Aikens & Hutter’s (2002) deliberates the methodology using a pair of surveys from the Schommer Epistemological Questionnaire (Schommer, 1990). The outcome of the examination of the participant’s answers from this questionnaire is exhibiting their beliefs as well thought-out by the surveys and sample articles starting with the slightest controversy to the greatest (Schommer-Aikens & Hutter, 2002). The essay confers the difference of opinion between the uses of epistemological beliefs when searching for…

    • 2088 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's Timaeus

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Popkin, Richard H. Columbia History of Western Philosophy, The. NY: Columbia UP, 2005. (ISBN 0231101295) (B72.C593 1999), pp.32-52…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays