Reasonable suspicion signifies the standard based on which the criminal activities are observed and arrest warrants are formulated. On the other hand, probable cause can be described as the logical belief in which with the help of facts criminal activity has been devoted (Kinports, n.d.). This assignment intends to compare and contrast between the legal concepts of reasonable suspicion and probable cause. This assignment also evaluates in what way these legal concepts can be applied to law enforcement officers along with examining the situation in which the law enforcement officers do not require to arrest the suspect. This paper also examines the exceptions that require warrant and how and when each exception would be utilized.
Discussion …show more content…
In compare and contrast among these two legal concepts it can be evaluated that reasonable suspicion is reasonable belief and probable cause is a logical belief. In reasonable suspicion, there is an open interpretation, whereas in probable cause there is evidence related to the crime (Kinports, n.d.).
Law enforcement officers can apply these legal concepts in their work for getting positive outcome. In this context, it can be highlighted that the officer can apply reasonable suspicion in their work to assess any criminal activity that has been committed or not. Moreover, the law enforcement officers can also apply the probable cause, which is a legal standard to examine the facts for arresting the particular person, who is involved in the criminal activity (FAS.Ord,