rebuttalment

Rebuttal I'll start with my opponents first contention that there are a number of jobs in the united states that have to be done if money is being funded into vocational education then the job being sought after will have a better qualified candidate than one that would require a college degree. That maybe be so but what they aren't considering is the fact that after the candidate that is getting a degree is done getting their degree, they will be making double the about of money than someone with vocational education could possible make therefore paying back the amount of money that was funded to them by the government and also making profit instead of losing money. Freebooks.uvu.edu shows that people with vocational education are more than 4 times more likely to be unemployed than doctoral (Ph.D., Ed.D., MD, or JD) graduates. Four-year graduates (Bachelor’s) make $387 more per week than high school grads. That’s $1,548 per month or $18,576 per year more. This pattern holds true among all US racial groups and among males and females. So why fund vocational education when it doesn't really give back to us instead we are just funding education that doesn't farther advance us in any way but wastes money from our government that could go towards preparatory education which does give back and advances us. Also a recently published E-article articulated the many benefits of college graduation that pointed out that the higher your education the better your medical insurance, health, lifestyle for family and next generation, contribution to society, and more. Education, especially earning degrees, is a doorway to many life-long payoffs to college graduates. Moving on to their second contention that choosing a vocational school will help the student be taught job specifics for the job they want to do, they wont need to take extra classes to get their training they need as you would have to do at a traditional four year college. But like I stated in my second