The Current Ratio decrease, due to assests, and an increase in liabilities, which indicates a 2.23% change in the ratio of assets to liabilities. The sharp drop in cash was offset by large rises in Net Accounts Receivable and Inventory, which are ordinarily unfavorable events also. However, if significant supplies were purchased (due to vendor discounts), the increase in Inventory could have been an astute business decision. The uncollected Accounts Receivables are troublesome.…
96 Balance Sheet 2004 2003 Edwards, Inc. has prepared the following comparative balance sheets Cash $198,000 $102,000 for 2003 and 2004: Receivables $106,000 $78,000 2004 2003 Inventory $100,000 $120,000 Prepaid expenses $12,000 $18,000 Cash $ 198,000 $102,000 Plant assets $840,000 $700,000 Receivables 106,000 78,000 Accumulated depreciation $(300,000) $(250,000) Inventory 100,000 120,000 Patent $102,000 $116,000 Prepaid expenses 12,000 18,000 $1,058,000 $884,000 Plant assets 840,000 700,000 Accounts payable $102,000 $112,000 Accumulated depreciation (300,000) (250,000) Accrued liabilities $40,000 $28,000 Patent 102,000 116,000 Mortgage payable $- $300,000 Preferred…
Current Performance: The current year of 1994, the inn again showed a positive increase in net income, with a slight drop in revenue. With proper managing of expenses and lower average collection period of 20, the inn has been able to report a higher net income. An issue for the inn shows a lower liquidity ratios, with the current ratio at .40 quite below the expected level of 1 and quick ratio of .35, representing the difficulty of converting inventory into cash. What this means is the low levels of the liquidity rations could spell the threat of possible bankruptcy.…
ACC/291 March 25,2012 Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio: Current Assets/Current Liabilities 2005 $14,555,092/ $6,974,752= 2.09:1 2004 $14,643,456/ $6,029,696=2.43:1 Acid Test Ratio: Cash+ Short-Term Investments + Receivables (Net)/ Current Liabilities 2005 $305,563 + $283,583 +$6,133,663/ $6,974,752= .96:1 2004 $357,216 + $133,504 + $5,775,104/ $6,029,696=1.04:1 Receivables Turnover: Net Credit Sales/ Average Net Receivables 2005 $50,823,685/ ($6,133,663 + 5,775,104/2) $50,823,685/ $5,954,384= 8.54 times 2004 $46,044,288/($5,775,104+6,569,344/2) $46,044,288/ $6,172,224=7,46 times Inventory Turnover: Cost of Goods Sold/ Average Inventory 2005 $42,037,624/ ($7,850,970+$7,854,112/2) $42,037,624/$7,852,541=5.35 times 2004 $37,480,050/ ($7,854,112+8,074,880/2) $37,480,050/ $7,964,496=4.71 times Profitability Ratios Current Assets 2004 2005…
TJX Companies Inc. is currently in one of the most secure subsets of the retail industry. The economy is a factor always present in the minds of consumers today, and the retail establishments operated under TJX Companies all cater towards the price conscience customer. They are hitting all ages and genders in the apparel industry in addition to home good products including furniture and accessories. They have expanded to reach many markets, and are continuing their expansion across the United States and throughout international countries in Europe. Their ability to payout higher dividends than the majority of the competitors in their industry, while still expanding their market segment proves their profitability along with their profit margin. The profit margin experienced by TJX has been increasing rapidly. There perfect placement in the marketplace and their successful current performance proves the strengths which lie with TJX Companies Inc. As of right now, TJX should work on growing their revenue to a higher value. Although the company is increasing in revenue from year to year, they have only jumped 4.3%. A possible weakness right now, the company’s current expansion should turn that around. Even still a stagnant revenue is much better than a declining revenue growth, which in this economy is not uncommon. If their revenue is able to grow, than they can focus on reestablishing their previous inventory method. Due to the economy, TJX restructured their inventory system in order to keep a smaller quantity on hand. With larger revenues and more sales, they will be able to profitably keep larger stocks of merchandising inventory on hand. Financial information is all interconnected, balancing and formulating from each aspect. As the economy turns around, sales increase, and revenues increase, the downfalls which TJX has endured will change into even greater profitable quarters.…
Eddie Bauer yielded the lowest net income among its competitors like The Gap, A & F and Land’s End. It achieved similar gross profit margin but got a poor performance on overall net income at 1% because it suffered from high expenditure on SG&A in both retail and catalog operations which accounted for 37% of its total net sales. This is extraordinary high while compared with its main competitors like A & F, and the Gap whose SG&A amounted to 22% and 27% of their net sales respectively (Table 1). A & F and Eddie Bauer are similar in size, distribution channels and sales volume, but the amounts of SG&A of Eddie Bauer was $318M, which is almost twice of A&F ($176M). Even though the net sales of Eddie Bauer was $511M which is 63% higher than A & F, the gross profit in absolute amount and percentage are both lower than A & F, which amounted $83M and approximately 5 times more in net income (Table 3). There are two main reasons, the high production cost ($75M) of catalogs with 3.75 million copies (Table 7) mailing out and the high sales return ($528M Gross sales - $345 net sales = $183M) which is due to the service commitment and the weaknesses of catalog business which offer no fitting and touching on the items and hence the return rate would be higher. This means a higher tendency of dead stock and the higher handling expenses that have negative impact to the company’s profit. Indeed, Eddie Bauer placed its footwear and swimwear items in catalog only, which accounted for an extremely high return rate throughout the industry, often over 50%.…
The company’s accounts payable is also a concern. Its accounts payable has grown by 17.94% per year on average, compared to its sales growth of 16.96% per year on average. Their accounts payable turnover has increased from 67.88 days and 70.22 days from 2007 to 2011 respectively. (Appendix B, E) This allows them to make it seem like they have more cash than they actually do, because they should be using it to repay their debts. This is also vulnerable to change even more, because of the cyclical pattern…
The customer segment for this company are people between 18-35 who love sport, nature, eco-friendly products and probably their willingness-to-pay more money is high, because of the high-quality of the clothes. Besides, the company always invested in innovations that benefits customers and make their satisfaction much higher. Distribution channels of this company are: large department stores, its Web site, catalog and wholesale business. As to consider internal consistency, the company’s goal is to use resources such as organic cotton and recycling in such technological way, so that it could cause no harm for the environment. In reality, these techniques bring the company more attraction and therefore more earnings. The other goal of the company is the simplicity. In spite of the fact that the company is private and can play like other businesses, it has minimum bureaucracy and even gives huge donations every year.…
For the period 2013, American Eagle presents a net income above the $2,000. Nonetheless, for the fiscal 2013 to the Fiscal 2014, the company went down from a 6.7% to a 2.5%, respectably. This evident decline in the AEO’s net income was due to the decrease in sales the firm has during this year caused by a weak store traffic in North America and the challenging and high level of promotional activity. Compare to A&F, American Eagle has a higher net income that certain helps the company to be recognized as a fashion brand…
Mark X Company manufactures farm and specialty trailers of all types. More than 85 percent of the company’s sales come from the western part of the United States, particularly California, although a growing market for custom horse transport vans designed and produced by Mark X is developing nationally and even internationally. Also, several major boat companies in California and Washington have had Mark X design and manufacture trailers for their new models, and these boat-trailer “packages” are sold through the boat companies’ nationwide dealer networks. Steve Wing, the president of Mark X, recently received a call from Karen Dennison, senior vice president of Wells Fargo Bank. Karen told Steve that a deficiency report generated by the bank’s computerized analysis system had been filed because of Mark X’s deteriorating financial position. The bank requires quarterly financial statements from each of its major loan customers. Information from such statements is fed into the computer, which then calculates key ratios for each customer and charts trends in these ratios. The system also compares the statistics for each company with the average ratios of other firms in the same industry and against any protective covenants in the loan agreements. If any ratio is significantly worse than the industry average, reflects a marked adverse trend, or fails to meet contractual requirements, the computer highlights the deficiency. The latest deficiency report on Mark X revealed a number of significant adverse trends and several potentially serious problems (see Tables 1 through 6 for Mark X’s historical financial statements). Particularly disturbing were the 1992 current, quick, and debt ratios, all of which failed to meet the contractual limits of 2.0, 1.0, and 55 percent, respectively. Technically, the bank had a legal right to call all the loans it had extended to Mark X for immediate repayment and, if the loans were not…
As Buck’s Hunting Equipment, Inc. (Buck) has came to an exciting phase of growth and development, a new complexity involving the assignment and presentation of its borrowing and payment activity as it relates to the revolving line of credit extended has emerged. The report has been broken down into the following sections:…
* Operating profits dropped from 47.3 million in 1987 to 20.2 million in 1988 because of lower margins…
Comparing the debt to equity we see that there is more debt than there is equity. This is a dangerous position for the firm to be in.…
In the present case of Fashion Clothing it can be seen that the company had invested capital and started the operations with the purchase of the assets in the first half of the year. The second half is being presented in the below analysis of the company. It can be seen that the company had provided the projected figures based on which the research has been carried on by us. The company’s operations are being presented in the financial statements in a way that we can judge how profitable the company would be in the time to come.…
La Martina is facing difficult corporate dilemma, whether to focus on a production and selling of functional polo equipment or to become more mainstream and fashion oriented brand.…