Preview

Reflection Paper - Taken (Movie)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
301 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reflection Paper - Taken (Movie)
According to Andrew Linklater, Marx wrote in the mid 1840s that capitalism would spread around the world and eventually destroy the divisions that set nation-states apart, thus creating a world capitalist society that would replace the international state-system. For Marx, colonialism is historically important because it helps capitalism to establish itself in non-capitalist societies. Therefore, Marx views capitalism, which causes the spread of industrial development throughout the whole world, as a precondition for forming a socialist society. He said that private property plays the key role in the transformation process from a traditional into a capitalist and finally into a communist society. According to Marx, colonizing traditional societies advances the conditions for an international socialist revolution because only when private property, which comes along with capitalism, exists in a society can it be abolished, and only with its abolition, can man emancipate himself from his alienated existence. In practice, Marx had examined “the effects of colonialism on Indian society”, which led him to criticize British imperialism, as it oppressively destroyed the Indian textile industry. On the other hand, he believed that “colonial rule is beneficial.”

Linklater writes that Marx failed to understand the immense consequences of nationalism because Marx believed that differences between societies would be reduced through capitalism. Also, he believed that the infrastructure (the economic basis of society) and the division of labor would influence the superstructure and the behavior of classes and states, rather than national consciousness. However, Marx had to deal with different types of nationalism: working class patriotism, bourgeois nationalism, romantic nationalism, and separatist and anti-colonial nationalism. Marx had an assumption, which was contradicted during the mid 19th century, when the English and the Irish proletariat faced each other as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1) Colonization has been prevalent since the age of mankind, likewise with economics. The economics of the world heavily correlates to the pattern of colonization that swept across the globe in the 1700’s. In the eyes of colonizers, their duties were strictly to enlighten the people of these univillied nations while retrieving goods to take back to their people. Going to places like Africa and Asia, natural resources were abundant, so colonizers felt as if taking these goods were not a disservice to the natives, but rather they were spreading the wealth to themselves. For example, the Spanish robbed the Americas of their “gold, spices, cotton palm oil their timber”(p39) all while redirecting the wealth back to Europe. Many colonizers failed to realize the century long ramifications they would create. Conversely, the natives were extremely aware that they were oppressed, attacked and abused.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Marx examines the oppression felt by the working class in Europe, known as the proletariat, at the hands of the ruling bourgeois class. Specifically, Marx analyzes the disproportionate distribution of wealth under the capitalist system. Finally, Marx urges the proletariat to fight for not only economic but also social equality with the bourgeois class and, most of all, the implementation of Communism. And while this ill and cure may seem only like a domestic governmental issue and revolution, it is not. Marx ultimately calls for "Communists everywhere [to] support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things." (The Communist Manifesto, P. 86) This strongly resembles the aim of imperialism: the extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force; but in this case it is not a matter of “a country’s”…

    • 1023 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism in the 19th century was defined as a nation composed of people joined together by a bond in language, culture, custom, and history. Under this definition, the United States of America is not nationalist because of the wide array of different cultures within the country. The differences of customs in the regions, like the Midwest, Northeast, Southeast, Southwest, and Northwest, are diverse from each other and would also cause the United States of America to not be considered nationalist. Nationalism impacted every single nation in the 19th century. It directly results in new nations as a result of the joining of nation states or the dividing of nations.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By eliminating the gap between rich and poor, Marx believes Communism should replace the economic system of Capitalism. In his perspective, he claims, “They have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite” (Marx 476). Because he sees the Capitalist system exploits workers who are unfairly treated, he asserts that the proletarians should become the ruling class. The principle of Communism is the ideology of collectivism. Marx states, “Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society: all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation” (470). This means that no private property should be allowed, and no one has even a less or more power in a Communist society. Because Marx illustrates the property ownership would enhance greed, and ambition to win in the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx shocked the world with his own publication, The Manifesto in 1848, which sharply contradicted the visions of Smith and the emergence of the Industrial Revolution (Heilbroner, 1999). Marx concepts of unification without social class for the good of all people were communicated and the birth of communism was realized. Unlike Smith, who believed that the division of labor increased productivity, Marx believed that labor becomes a commodity and power rested in the hands of those who controlled production (Armor, 1997). Marx believed that the pending Industrial Revolution would create havoc and confusion to the capitalists' society…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Colonization is building a colony in new land, but unfortunately, as seen in throughout history, that definition of colonization was not the case. Colonization was an outlet for the imperial nations to spread their religion, their economic beliefs, and the rule of monarchy, but not to present change necessary by the colonized tribes. It was the power of governing influence of a democracy over a dependent country, territory, or group of people to exploit them for their land and resources. A noticed pattern of this redefined colonization can be see all the way back to the 1700’s and has continued today. Superior groups saw colonization as an opportunity to abuse their power and take over inferior colonies who won't resist with any armed protection. It is noted that throughout history, countries used colonization as a way to handle their economic and social issues. It has evolved into a vessel for racism, oppression, and dehumanization. These patterns of the development of colonization and its impact can be seen dating back to the 1700’s in texts such as A Modest Proposal and Zong, then the transition into the 1800’s as colonization evolved from the Industrial Revolution that can be seen in the control of the Native Americans, into more recently in the 1900’s in the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and The Big Chief Mshlanga and we take a look at how colonization has impacted the world today in excerpts from “Home”.…

    • 3130 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx and Nietzsche

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Before expounding upon these ideas, it is necessary to establish a baseline from which to view these topics. It is important to realize that we as humans view everything from our own cultural perspective. Marx speaks of this saying, "Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class made into a law for all, a will, whose essential character and direction are determined by the economical conditions of existence of your class."…

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Colonialism

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Marxist ideology, earlier colonialism was considered as the era of pre-capitalism and modern colonialism was established alongside capitalism in Western Europe. In the former kind of colonialism, the colonizers extract goods and wealth from the colonized countries, but in the latter besides extracting wealth, the colonizers enter the colonized countries in a complex economic relationship which affected their attitude toward themselves. In this process, natural and human resources are exchanged between the colonized and the colonizer. The colonized countries prepare slave force and market for the colonizer goods and capital. In the colonial system, the colonizer favors population growth of the colonized, because it reduces the cost of labour. The colonizers consider the colonized as subhuman and deny them the human rights; as a result the colonizers establish themselves as the valued and elite…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alex De Tocqueville Analysis

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Karl Marx and Frederick Engels are well known for their contributions to socio-economics which was displayed in their writing of The Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels wanted society to establish a classless system in which the proletariat would rise up over the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie represented the ruling class which had been established as a result of the failed system of feudalism in the 1800s. Marx believed that the bourgeoisie could rule only so long as it best represented the economically productive forces of society and that when it ceased to do so it would be destroyed and replaced and eventually this cycle would continue until there was a virtually classless society. In his writing Marx argues that the proletariat needs to overtake the bourgeoisie by means of a social revolution. He believes that due to Industrialism the proletariats have learned how to work together and will thus untie to overthrow the bourgeoisie. The proletariats had become the productive class, even though they…

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, “Communist Manifesto,” Marx stresses the importance of communism or the publication of private property. As stated above, John Locke was the influencer of human basic rights, which included the right to own private property. The development of the Capitalist soon came after this right was made. Capitalists were key contributors to the rise of the industrial revolution but also to the fall of small shop owners. These shop owners were without income and the only way to provide a source was by working for these wealthy owners. A clear distinction between these two types people was their level of income and property which brought on the social classes. There was an oppressor and the oppressed. Before I go further with any explanations, this picture here of classes shows that only one class is progressing. The oppressor is the class that prospers in context of human progression through technological advancements. “Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other- bourgeoisie and proletariat (Marx 9).” The bourgeoisie were the capitalist while the proletariat was the lower working class. Separation between the two came along with the industrial revolution. Romanticist like Marx would oppose this as human progression because as a whole we aren’t all included in this promotion. It seems as the Capitalists are being set up on a pedestal…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The reasons behind European imperialism in Africa were purely economic. Though there were other reasons, economic reasons can be argued to be core reasons that drove Europeans towards Africa.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A major argument that Marx put across in his scripts was that capitalism would force society to polarise, causing two classes within society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. These classes were at both extremes of the social spectrum, the bourgeoisie been the rich "fat cats" who reeped the fruits of capitalism, they were normally the factory or…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the mid 1800’s two men by the names of Karl Marx and Friedrech Engels wrote a book called “The Communist Manifesto”. In this book Marx proposed that capitalism was a system full of flaws and…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics