Preview

Reflections on the First Amendment Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reflections on the First Amendment Paper
Reflections on the First Amendment Paper
Ephraim Iivula
HIS/301
May 29, 2011
Kenneth Johnston University of Phoenix

Reflections on the First Amendment According to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Consequently, citizens from different occupations often file legal challenges for court adjudication on perceived injustice. This paper focuses on numerous momentous cases related to three of the provisions of the First Amendment, namely freedom of speech, press, and religion. The cases as enumerated shortly represent such examples, in which citizens challenge social norms and seek for Supreme Court hearing or interpretation. In addition, the paper evaluates the rights and responsibilities that the Constitution gives American citizens.
Notable First Amendment Court Cases
John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al. v. Free Speech Coalition, et al. (2002) The right to freedom of speech came under scrutiny in the case of John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al. versus Free Speech Coalition, et al. in 2002. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's judgment against the plaintiff’s broader definition of pornography in enacting the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996. This broader definition, the court finds it in contravention with the First Amendment. The Ninth Circuit reasoned that the definition of banning any depiction of pornographic materials, including films that Congress adds on the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 was overboard and as such violated the First Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote: "First Amendment freedoms are most in danger



References: American Library Association: Notable First Amendment court cases: Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oif/firstamendment/courtcases/courtcases.cfm John W. Whitehead , May 16, 2011, Renewing the Patriot Act: Who Will Protect Us from Our Government?, Retrieved from http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=711 Patterson, T. E. (2009). The American democracy (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Sherbert v. Verner et al., Members of South Carolina Employment Security Commission, et al. (1963): Retrieved from http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/curiae/html/374-398/001.htm U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, First Amendment: Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    A Fight for Freedom for Journalists “A First Amendment Blind Spot” was published in The Wall Street Journal by Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. The author is a partner of the Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP. He is also the co-chair of the International Women’s Media Foundation. Moreover, he was denominated by the National Law Journal as one of 100 most influential lawyers in America (“Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., JD Biography”).…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS: In Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition, the Supreme Court was given the task of deciding whether or not the Child Pornography Prevention Act or CPPA violated the First Amendment. If a violation of the First Amendment was proven the CPPA would have been found unconstitutional. The Free Speech Coalition, a part of the adult entertainment industry, felt that the language and ultimately the message conveyed by the CPPA was too broad and too vague and had the ability to be misused and could prevent future production.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Podesta, J., USA Patriot Act (n.d.) The Good, the Bad, and the Sunset. Retrieved December 4, 2006 from website http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an earlier case Dennis v. United States the Supreme Court concluded that there was a distinction between the mere teaching of communist philosophies and active advocacy of those ideas. Because of this the Smith Act was upheld and the act did not violate the First Amendment. In another case Brandenburg v. Ohio the Supreme Court ruled that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is directed to inciting, and is likely to incite, imminent lawless action. Imminent lawless action is for defining the limits of free speech and imminent lawless action is the precedent used today.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (Smith, 1997)…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    McCarthy, M. (2002) Recent Development: USA Patriot Act. 39 Harvard Journal on Legislation 435. Retrieved from http://www.lexisnexis.com.library.capella.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/?shr=t&csi=143841&sr=TITLE(USA+Patriot+Act)+and+date+is+2002.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment is all about your rights and how these are used in the world today. The "clear and present danger" test is a basic principle for deciding the limits of free speech. It was set by the famous Schenck v. the United States case from World War I. Anti War activist Charles Schenck was arrested for sending leaflets to prospective army draftees encouraging them to ignore their draft notices. The United States claimed that Schenck threatened national security, and the justices agreed. The principle was established that free speech would not be protected if an individual were a "clear and present danger" to United States security.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talked about how the students of UC Berkeley were protesting against a speech being given at their school, and how the sponsors of this group were forced to pay $15,000 in security fees. Then on top of that fee the school paid an additional $600,000 to create cemented barriers and have armed forces on campus during the meeting. Personally I feel these precautions were unnecessary however due to the way students were reacting it had to be done. Another subject brought up in the article was the fact that 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect "hate speech", 51 percent said that they would be in favor of students speaking out against a speaker "known for making offensive and hurtful statements" and 19 percent of students said the use of violence against controversial speakers is acceptable. This information frustrates me because freedom of speech is black and white, personal opinions shouldn’t interfere with our rights.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Framers Intent Paper

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will describe the original intent of the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will explain current views of the provisions of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will assess which events and opinions have changed the intent of each of these provisions over time. I will evaluate the effects of Supreme Court decisions related to these provisions and express consideration for the future of these provisions.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the fact that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, the Supreme Court has created a category of unprotected speech that consists of “fighting words.” In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Court defined fighting words as “words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace.” The Court established that in order for the speaker's speech to fall under the fighting words doctrine the speech must be directed to an individual face-to-face and the words must have a tendency to cause the average person to respond with an immediate violent action. Fighting words are not subject to First Amendment protection because they don’t convey ideas and are not of social value.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot act essay 4

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of America’s greatest presidents in history, John F. Kennedy once said that the first and most efficient particles of “individual liberty is the freedom of speech; the right to express and communicate ideas, to set oneself apart from the dumb beasts of field and forest . . .” Many American politicians and lawmakers today seems to have lost sight of the…

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment guarantees “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press.” The freedom of speech, press, and religion have been pillars of the United States and other Democratic nations who knew the need to have these rights guaranteed. This idea was a major element of the Enlightenment period, the thoughts of John Locke, Jean Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Voltaire would be incorporated into the Constitution which included Freedom of Speech as a Human Right. Schenck v United States rules that the First Amendment stands for all speech as long as it doesn’t cause a “Clear and Present Danger.” No laws have been placed to decrease opinion.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first amendment of the US Constitution has come into a lot of political controversy because it gives us some of the very essential rights to be whom we want to be. Under the first amendment we as United States citizens have the right to “freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble”, which some people don’t want us to have these rights and will try to come up with laws to restrain us from using them so it can benefit their cause (Ivers, 2013). I feel that the government wants to have the power to keep us in control and be able to do what they want, when they want with us.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Francis Mejia Period 4 Many parts of the United States Constitution can be interpreted in different ways. This makes it difficult to make decisions on cases because of the many possible ways to look at what is constitutional and what is not. In every court decision, The Supreme Court must carefully analyze and interpret the amendments to the Constitution and apply them. The first Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” One controversial case involving the rules of the First Amendment was Snyder v. Phelps in 2010.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today I will be discussing three freedoms from the first amendment. I will identify how these freedoms have developed in our society. You will also hear a few of my own personal experiences that I have had regarding these freedoms. The first amendment states : “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise there of, or abridging the freedom of speech; or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of greivencess.” In the next few paragraphs we will be discussing this. So lets begin. “ congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” Religion is a topic that not many people like to talk about, yet it is an important one at that. Establishing a religion has come a long way in society. Back in the early 1900’s there were few religions, nowadays there a too many to count. Everyone believes something different, in a room of 75 people all may be a different religion. So from that you can see how much that freedom has been appreciated. You cannot tell someone not to believe what they do, so establishment of religion is where that plays a role. “freedom of speech” and “the right of the people to peaceably assembly.” To me these two freedoms deffinetly go together hand and hand. Think of protesters, they don’t always peaceably gather but they get their freedom of speech, to speak how they feel. Human rights activists assemble peaceably to raise money or make known a cause they are helping. If this freedom wasn’t here that couldn’t happen, just think how have these two freedoms benefited you? To conclude, our society wouldn’t be where it is today if we didn’t have these freedoms. There would be no progress. We have all benefited from these in one way or another, whether through ourselves or from someone else. For years to come the first amendment will continue to play a huge part in our…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays