Preview

Regressive Tax

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Regressive Tax
Regressive Tax
Subject: Argument for Implementing Regressive Income Tax
The primary income taxation structure in the United States should be a regressive tax structure. A regressive tax rate decreases with an increase in the tax base. This means, the lower the amount of income a person earns, the greater the share of that income will go towards paying taxes. The income tax should become a regressive tax because every tax bracket would then pay roughly the same dollar amount in taxes to the government out of income. Everyone paying the same dollar amount in taxes makes all tax payers equal. The negative impact of this is that lower income earners will pay a higher percentage of their income to taxes. This does not necessarily make a regressive income tax unfair.
The main argument in favor of using a regressive tax is that every level of income would pay the same monetary amount of taxes. The dollar amount of a smaller tax on a greater income will be approximately equal to the dollar amount of a large tax on a smaller income. Thus, the regressive tax can be seen as being fair since all citizens will be paying the same amount of taxes. Another reason to convert the income tax into a regressive tax is to teach lower income earners the value of money. To explain, the government implements excise taxes in order to encourage or discourage certain behavior. For example, a higher tax is placed on alcohol and cigarettes to discourage purchase of those items. A regressive tax rate can be compared to an excise tax. If the people who earn less income are taxed at a higher rate, they might realize how important saving money is. This would teach lower income earners better money management by decreasing excess spending. The money the lower income earners will save can help them in the long run.
An argument against regressive tax looks at the “fairness” characteristic from another angle. Instead of looking at the tax and seeing that each income level pays approximately the same



References: "What Are the Pros and Cons of a Regressive Tax?." WiseGeek. Web. Retrieved 31 Aug. 2013 from www.wisegeek.org/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-a-regressive-tax.htm. “Regressive Taxes.” IRS. Web. Retrieved August 31, 2013 from http://apps.irs.gov/app/understandingTaxes/student/whys_thm03_les02.jsp

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Franchise.org,. (2010). What are the advantages and disadvantages of owning a franchise | International Franchise Association. Retrieved 24 March 2015, from http://www.franchise.org/what-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-owning-a-franchise…

    • 988 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    James Hall.Chapter16

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Replacing the progressive rate structure of the federal personal income tax with a proportional one would make the tax more regressive (or less progressive). However, the various exemptions, deductions, and credits must still be considered. Many people who support a proportional rate structure do so as a means of simplifying the personal income tax. It is really only simplified if the number of exemptions, deductions, and credits are reduced or eliminated. It might be useful to discuss how a proportional tax rate structure could be combined with various exemptions, etc., to make the tax more progressive, and whether this is appropriate.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is due to the fact that tax rates may vary according to governmental aims and therefore individuals would lack the essential stability to formulate a meaningful life. Furthermore, Nozick also argues that taxing for the purpose of redistributing is equivalent to forced labour and hence a de facto form of slavery.…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The most obvious benefit of the flat tax rate would be its simplicity. Many Americans struggle with the complexity of current tax forms, but with a flat rate, that would be eradicated. “The individual postcard is so simple that a third-grader could file a family 's tax return in about five minutes,” says Daniel Mitchell, a supporter of the reform (2005). Only having two postcards would eliminate waste, save time and money, and eliminate the need for extraneous work at the Internal Revenue Service, which costs $12 billion to operate annually (Mitchell, 2010). Furthermore, a flat tax system may promote economic growth. According to Mitchell, a new system would “spur increased work,…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Thomas Sowell’s article, “The Fallacy of Fair”, he makes it clear that he believes many of the people who utilize the term fair in politics do not truly understand it’s meaning. He urges the idea that society is often blamed for the results of the handicaps that life bestows upon groups or people, leading society to attempt to level out the playing field for those on the bottom end of the totem pole. This concept in itself portrays the real injustice considering it skews the reality of a group's true situation, causing said group to think they are better off than they are. Evidently, this robs them of the incentive to identify the true problem and to improve (Sowell, 2010).…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civics Study Guide

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Regressive taxes hit the poor harder; progressive taxes very with a persons ability to pay.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This could lead to a high rise in other taxes in order to match what they would previously gain from federal taxes. The money paid as income tax contributes back into the states and nation. Infrastructure such as highways, schools, and roads are dependent on federal funding as so is Social Security, Medicare, hospital insurance, unemployment insurance, military and law enforcement, and national defense. Once the tax is abolished the whole country would immediately feel the impact. It would be impossible to pay of national debt. Even though nobody enjoys paying taxes it does benefit us in ways we may not recognize. There could be improvements but federal taxes should not be removed as a whole; it could lead to government shutdown, national bankruptcy, and chaos within the streets. This tax is necessary even though it might seem evil to us. It benefits the needy greatly in America and those who cannot help themselves. It is a strong catalyst of cash flow in our economy and improvement of our…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    , it shows us that in the state of Texas, the poorest 20% of the state pays 12.2% in taxes of their income, the middle 60% pays 7.6%, and the top 1% pays 3.3%. Being a regressive state results in having people who have a hard time supporting themselves paying more than people who have no problem with their finances. With an income tax, it would turn the state into a “progressive state” meaning that the people will be taxed based on their income, and it would be an appropriate amount for what they earn.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every day, our government is spending billions of dollars to support and defend American citizens. Programs in education, social security, welfare, environmental regulation, national defense and many other realms of our society require massive budgets to function and grow. So to fund all the interests of the country, many different types of taxes are imposed on people and businesses. But due to recent economic downturns, some doubt the tax code and want reform. While there may be some benefits to a change, altering our tax system would end up creating many more problems than it would fix, hurting the nation’s economy and its growth.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Flat Tax

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The government have to treat all the citizens equally. When you are paying tax you are likely buying services from the government. You are buying security and education for your kids. So services should be equally provided for all citizens and in the same cost. Flat tax would ensure that everyone is treated equally, but some people disagree with this and think that How would you feel about becoming poor and not being able to get a job? I'm sure that you would hate that. The poor come from low income. I think people with the income of $80,000 a year is not like the one who gets $220,000 a…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Advocates of this ideology say taxing the wealthy will make them unhappy with the country and will make them emigrate to a country with lower tax rate. Proponents of tax breaks say that when the affluent are given tax breaks the economy will prosper because the rich are more likely to spend. The tax break advocates say cutting the top tax rate will increase economic growth because when the wealthy spend their money, growth will occur in small businesses, which in turn causes wage growth, income growth as well as job creation. The advocates say that this all increases the tax revenue for the government in the end, so cutting taxes for the rich is the long term solution to the inequality between the lower class and upper…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax.” -Albert Einstein. Many lower class Americans feel they shouldn’t have to pay as much taxes as the upper class. A tax (from the latin taxo; “rate”) is a financial charge or levy imposed upon a citizen of a state or the functional equivalent of a state to fund public expenditures. It is not right for the American Federal Government to tax the rich more than everyone else to get America out of debt and to pay for our country's needs because not all rich people were handed their money, there are other ways to eliminate America’s debt, and the rich would stop supporting the local and non federal foundations, churches, and other people not supported federally by the government.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Highway Policy

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Slade, J. (2010). Pros and Cons of the Legal Drinking Age. Duke University Research Blog. Retrieved from http://research.duke.edu/blog/2010/05/pros-and-cons-legal-drinking-age…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If every household gave the same amount of their income in taxes than the disparity of income would be less. Many Americans today don’t care much for the tax code system, and it’s not because they pay too much. It’s that they feel that the more “wealthy” aren’t paying their fair share. Well according to The Center of American Progress the OECD report finds that the richest 10% of American households earn about 28% of the overall income pie. That’s a lot. Surely they can spare a…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taxing is a big concept in America and almost everything is taxed as well as income. The problem is that everyone wants low income taxes. America has one of the lowest taxes of any country. Wealthy people don’t want to be taxed as much because they feel it is unfair that more money is getting taken away, while poor people feel it’s unfair that wealthy people make so much money while they are struggling making enough money to provide for their families and pay the bills. The government can higher taxes on people who make more money than the rest and provide more benefits for the less fortunate. It’s hard to come to a consensus when it comes down to everyone’s wealth, but as long as it does not have an affect on our physical and mental…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays