This paper will make use of case law, statutes and legal writings to establish discussions that will determine the rightful interest-holder of the property above. In assessing whether Pamela has a priority over the two mortgagees, it is appropriate to first establish whether she has an interest over the property. Acquisition of interest in land exists in various forms. They include purchase of the land, inheritance, interest through a trust and adverse possession.…
Cases involving the payment of compensation for the expropriation of property must be settled in courts of law.…
For many years, litigation has been the one thing in reference to the law that traditionally resolves lawsuits and disputes. There are many facts that need to be considered when one compares or contrasts traditional litigation methods to the nontraditional litigation methods (Alternate Dispute Resolution). Handled outside of litigation in court, ADR is a unique resolution. ADR’s types include “arbitration, collaborative law, mediation and negotiation. Conciliation is sometimes included as a fifth category” (Alternate Dispute Resolution Law, 2011).…
Remedies at law have to do with payment of money or property as compensation for damages. Remedies in equity have to with issuing specific performances, recessions, and injunctions.…
Furthermore, within the American legal system, there are both legal and equitable remedies available to both the plaintiff and the defendant in a case. The remedy provided depends upon the type of case being decided; for example, whether the case is of the civil or criminal nature. A legal remedy often enforces a right, imposes a penalty, or makes another court order to impose its will. Examples of a legal remedy include restitution paid to the victim of a crime or the imposing of a prison sentence upon a defendant. Equitable remedies are distinguished from legal remedies and are quite popular in the field of contract law. Equitable remedies may involve the use of an injunction, specific performance of a contract that…
"What then is the principle to guide the courts in determining whether to grant Mareva relief in a case such as the present where the activities of third parties are the object sought to be restrained? In our opinion such an order may, and we emphasise the word “may”, be appropriate, assuming the existence…
" Types of Justice | Beyond Intractability. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Sept. 2014. <…
Justice is central to our law. Most would agree the law should be just, but justice is not easy to define. The concept has been studied by many philosophers all of whom have their own theories of what a just society should be.…
The right to exclude others or to have control over the access of strangers from the benefits of a property is hence the key in identifying what is (or is not) property, and in defining the ‘propertiness’ of property.[5]…
Two terms that are import to sport and closely linked are equality and equity. While being closely linked and sometimes though the mean the same both have different meaning in relation to sport. Firstly the term equality refers to a situation where individuals as well as groups are equal and have the same rights and ability to access opportunities. Secondly the term equity can be studied to determine whether resources are distributed fairly to all members of a society. Both of these terms can be closely connected with physical activity.…
Injunction is a drastic solution, used only when damage is permanent and is not satisfactorily compensable only to monetary damages. The function of remedies is to prevent nuisance from continuing. That is a person injured by a nuisance may bring an action and claim damages against the accused for the injury alone or together with claim of an injunction.…
not just making sure that things are fair or just in the legal sense. Justice is also about resolving…
Equity looks to intent, rather than form. This is a question of construction of the relevant documents or of gathering inferences from the words or conduct of the alleged settlor, considering all the circumstances of the case.…
An interlocutory injunction is an equitable remedy, which temporarily prohibits the defendant, from continuing a particular activity. The purpose of this injunction is to maintain the status quo or preserve the subject matter so that no permanent harm is done to the rights of the applicant before a court hearing or trial. Given the nature of the relief the courts have taken a variety of factors into account in exercising its discretion to grant or not grant the relief. It is for this reason the American Cyanamid case came about, as it attempted to furnish the courts with a judicial structure or judicial guidelines, which may aid in determining whether an interlocutory remedy should be granted. However it is noteworthy that Prior to the American Cyanamid case, the court employed a different test to determine whether or not the relief should be granted. It has been argued that the decision of the American Cyanamid reformulated that old test and as such is a complete break away from settled principles. However upon close examination of the new principles established in the case, it is seen that the test simply made minor procedural changes as such the substantive element remained the same. Thus it would not be correct to state bluntly that the decision in the American Cyanamid case is a complete breakaway from the settled principles upon which an interlocutory injunction is granted.…
the questions of how legal orders can acquire, or have legitimacy, and is often presented as a…