Is basing religion on morality a good idea? Many people agree although some atheists may disagree.
One common complaint about secularism is that religion and belief in God are fundamentals for morality, justice, and a democratic society. The basic premise here is that the only values which ultimately matter are those which are transcendent, and such values can only be perceived and understood through religious tradition and a connection with the divine. It is strange that such a belief would be as common as it is, because religions and various types of theism have had literally thousands of years during which they could demonstrate that they could provide the basis for a just, moral, and democratic society. For the most part, they haven 't done a very good job; on the contrary, religion is too often associated with immorality, injustice, and political repression.
Although these failures do not prove that religion cannot help provide a basis for morality, justice and democracy, they do prove that such values do not naturally and immediately flow from religion - an important point which should discourage people from actively believing in the necessary connection between those values and either religion generally or their religion in particular.
Is Religion Necessary for Morality? Is morality dependent upon the existence of any gods? There is no clear reason why we should believe such a thing. If we assume the existence of a god, even a god who has many of the traditional qualities of classical, philosophical theism, there are no particular moral values which we can derive from that premise.
Can human morality exist without religion?
There is no simple "yes" or "no" answer to this question. The Chambers Dictionary 's first definitions of morality are: "relating to character or conduct consider as good or evil; ethical; adhering to or directed towards what is right." This raises the