Preview

Rene Descartes Arguments For The Existence Of God

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1860 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rene Descartes Arguments For The Existence Of God
There has not been a subject more hotly contested in human history than the existence of God. As modern scientific thinking continues to develop the discussion surrounding God’s existence has only intensified. In fact, as religion and science begin to come into conflict more frequently and people find it harder to have faith the debate has often boiled over. Personally, I do believe in a God, but I see Him a little differently than the traditional Biblical portrayal of God. One of the biggest reasons I choose to believe in God is the feeling of comfort that I am provided with from the belief that He is watching over me. Additionally, I choose to believe that God exists because believing that He is always going to be with me is reassuring as …show more content…
Descartes believed that God must exist because God alone could conceive of the idea of infinite goodness. He briefly considered the idea that God might be an evil genius or a deceiver, but he concluded that this was not the case. His idea of God is like Anselm’s in that he believes that God is a perfect and infinite being. Additionally, Descartes uses some ideas in his arguments which are like those of Aquinas regarding the casual principles of the arguments. The first way Descartes attempts to proves God’s existence is by starting with the idea that God is a perfect being. He follows this by claiming that existing is more perfect than not existing, thus God must exist. He begins his second argument for God’s existence by saying that it is an innate idea which everybody has that God is an infinite being. Next, Descartes claims that because we think of God as a being that is infinite God has infinite reality. He continues by saying that something cannot come from nothing, and that something cannot come from a thing that has less reality than itself. Descartes concludes by reasoning that because only God has infinite reality God alone could have been the cause of the idea of an infinite and perfect being, therefore God exists. My arguments for God’s existence have some similarities to Descartes’ arguments, as well as some key differences. My beliefs are like Descartes’ arguments in that I believe that God is an infinite being, and that I think that the idea of God came from somewhere other than my own mind. Also, I agree with Descartes’ conclusion that God is not an evil genius nor a deceiver. However, my arguments also differ from Descartes’ in several areas including the idea that existing is more perfect than not existing, and the claim that the idea that God is an infinite being is innate. Additionally, I disagree with Descartes’ idea that a thing cannot come

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Descartes later reformulated the ontological argument, who sought to prove the existence of God through reason alone. He stated that he exists, and in his mind he has the concept of a perfect being, and as an imperfect being, he could not have conjured up the idea of a perfect being, therefore this idea must have originated from the perfect being itself, and this perfect being must exist in order to be perfect, consequently a perfect being exists. He also stated that the idea of God is the idea of a perfect being, and a supremely perfect being has all perfections, existence is perfection, a supremely perfect being must have existence, therefore it is impossible to think of God as not existing, hence God exists.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If he had not reached the metaphysical certainty of the self, it is likely that he would not be able to find any metaphysical certainty at all, including that of God’s existence. From this, Descartes then moves on to go about proving the existence of an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, infinite, omniscient God. Before discussing Descartes’s proof of God’s existence, it is important to first discuss ideas, substances, and their realities. According to Descartes, ideas are formed in the human mind in three ways. Ideas are either experienced or perceived in the world, they have been created or invented, or they have been derived from one’s own nature.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes thinks that since we all have an innate idea of a perfect being, then that perfect being, which he calls God, has to exist, or else it would not be perfect anymore. There are two problems with this line of thought. First, do we really have an innate idea of a perfect being? Wouldn’t we need to acquire the concept of “perfect” and “being” first? It is true that we could not have directly seen or experienced a perfect being in real life, but that does not mean the idea of a perfect being has to be innate. Rather, we can form this idea merely by experiencing non-perfect beings and imagining the opposite, just like how we develop the idea of immaterial things after we have seen or experienced material things. Therefore, the idea of a perfect being is not innate, and in fact, it is possible for us never to have that idea at all. On the other hand, why must a perfect being exist? Why should existence be better, “more perfect,” than non-existence? Descartes does not give us enough evidence of the “perfectness” of existence, and thus existence cannot be guaranteed as an essential part of the perfect being’s property. Now I have shown that Descartes’ main argument for God’s existence is flawed, although I still do not rule out the possibility of God’s…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to this principle, the reality of the cause must be greater than or equal to the reality of the effect. The idea of God has infinite reality and, by theory, the only cause of this infinite idea can only be God. With all this said, the reality of God is the only plausible cause to the reality of the idea of God. Descartes gives another proof in Meditation Five where he has reasoned that a triangle must have all the properties he assigns to it, because the triangle exists as an idea in his mind and he clearly and distinctly perceives all these properties. He then reasons, by analogy, that God exists as an idea in his mind and he clearly and distinctly perceives all of his qualities. One of these qualities is existence, so it follows from his clear and distinct perception that God must exist. If existence is the essence of God, then God would not be God if he did not exist, just as a triangle would not be a triangle if it were not three-sided. At the very least, then, the existence of God must be as certain as the properties of mathematical and geometrical objects since he can prove them in the same way. Having concluded that God must necessarily exist, Descartes goes further and then asks how he received the idea of God. He could have not invented the idea. Therefore, the idea must be innate which, according to Descartes, means that God must have created him…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes casts everything into doubt in the first meditation, including God Himself. He then comes to this disproval of this theory therefore concluding that God exists. This is brought about through the causal argument.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basis of Descartes proof that God exists is in the nature of ideas. What is the nature of ideas? To explain what they are, Descartes splits ideas into two categories. The first group of ideas is like the images of things, for example, a man, or an angel. These ideas are basic, and are not truth apt. What that means is that they are neither true nor false. For example, if I am having an idea of an angel, it doesn’t seem sensible to ask, “is that idea you are having of an angel true or false?”, because it can never be less true that I am in fact imagining the angel. The main point is that these ideas do not have a truth value. However, other ideas are capable of being true or false. For these ideas, they are connected to the outside World in a way that involves a claim. For example, if I claimed, “this ball is red”, this claim could be true or false because the ball could in fact be red, or I could be mistaken! This second group of ideas is known as judgments, and judgments are truth apt. Descartes says that to remove this possibility for falsity in judgments, ideas should be taken simply as modes of…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Take Home Test Sample

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Descartes’ Eideological Proof for God’s existence claims that we have an idea in our minds that a person more perfect than ourselves exists. Descartes’ says that we know we cannot come from nothing, but we can also not come from ourselves. The idea of perfection has been placed in our minds by a person who is already perfect and God is the ONLY adequate idea of perfection that there is known.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes famously wrote his version of the ontological argument in the ‘Meditations’ in which he argued that God is an infinite being, perfect. For God to remain perfect he must then retain existence. He used the illustration of a triangle with three angles which all add up to 180 degrees. This quality of the triangle allows the triangle to be perfect and to be defined as a triangle. If the angles were taken away from the triangle it would no longer be a triangle. This is similar as to God; he could not be God if he did not exist. This proves according to Descartes that God’s existence is necessary.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Descartes decided to tear down his beliefs and start fresh, he needed a foundation upon which to build his ideology. When judging what reality is, God must be considered. He/she must be taken out of a religious concept and proven to exist, exist in a way in which we cannot be deceived into only thinking is real. The proof of the existence of God in this way forms the backbone of Descartes’ further forays into proving what is reality.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes and Skepticism

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Question: In Meditation III, Descartes argues that his idea of God could not have come from him, and so God must exist. How does this argument go?…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Meditation Iii

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In earlier meditations Descartes proved that he existed through the Cogito argument. Descartes must now move on to examine and explore questions about the world around him, but instead of doing this he first stop to examine the question of whether or not God exists. Descartes wants to know that he was created by an all knowing, perfect creator that is good and wants to make sure that he was not created by an evil spirit or demon. If Descartes can prove that he was created by a perfect all knowing creator then his ideas must carry some semblance of truth, because God is not a deceiver and he must of placed these ideas in Descartes. Descartes has good reasons for searching for the answer to the question of God's existence, now he has to come up with a good sound argument to prove it.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In conclusion, despite each argument having its strengths and weaknesses, the ontological argument shines because it underscores perfect theology and reason, making it a compelling contender for the most persuasive argument for the existence of God. It's crucial to continue discussing and examining these arguments in order to fully grasp their complexities and importance. Descartes' argument merges cosmology and ontology in order to demonstrate the existence of a supremely perfect being. He argues that the concept of a perfect being is innate to us and cannot originate from anything else. This argument highlights the idea of perfection within us and posits that it must have originated from a perfect being, which is God.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, Descartes in the third meditation sets out to prove that God does indeed exist. To begin with, he considered that the source of an idea must be as real as the idea itself. He thought that since his idea of God had overwhelmingly unlimited content, then the one who caused the idea must be infinite and that it must be god, and thus asserted that what is more perfect cannot arise from what is imperfect. In his conclusion, Descartes says that God is a substance that is omnipotent, omniscient, independent and infinite. He argued that if the objective reality of an idea could not come from him, then it could have come from something else. The basis for the arguments he put forward lies in the…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By establishing the existence of God, Descartes enables himself to argue that any idea that is clear and distinct to us is innate and completely trustworthy (36). It seems that Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is a replica of his argument for his own existence: I have an idea of myself; therefore, I exist; and, I have an idea of God; therefore, God exists. One might wish to resist the argument because, as Nagel points out, the way that Descartes goes about arguing, starting from the idea of God to the existence of God, implies that the idea of perfection cannot be caused by a less-than-perfect source (36). This is what is known as the causal principle, and as Nagel mentions, it is an appeal that many readers do not find completely convincing…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes’ first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs. On the contrary, he uses these arguments to help prove one of his main theses, which is the existence of God. One of the main premises that Descartes uses in his proof for the existence of God comes from the evil demon argument, which he proposed, in the first meditation. It is this evil demon argument, which will be the topic of the following discussion.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays