Preview

Rene Descartes Meditation 1 Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rene Descartes Meditation 1 Summary
In meditation one, Descartes believes that sciences require that the truth is absolutely certain and because of this he chooses to reject any all beliefs that have even a slight possibility of doubt. But since all beliefs can’t be proved certain, then all of the beliefs he has are doubtful and deceiving. And because his senses tell him this false belief is true, his senses are also an illusion. To simplify: all of Descartes’ beliefs and senses are illusions that an “evil genius” made up. Descartes feels like he can't know anything and that everything he is experiencing is a dream or that an “evil genius” does things to deceive us making us think something happened when nothing actually happened and we just stopped thinking for a little bit. …show more content…
In our lives, we can remember most of everything that goes on instead of having it all be a blur. If we had an “evil genius” deceiving us by making us think that something is happening to us when really we just stopped thinking for a little while, then if someone balled up their fist and punched me in the face knocking me unconscious, how come I would feel light headed and my head would hurt for awhile after I become conscious again? If we had the “evil genius” deceiving us by making us think that we got hit in the head when we actually just stopped thinking for a little bit, we would feel nothing afterward and we would stand back up like nothing had happened. Things can happen to us, such as getting hurt, that are not optical
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    draft5 1

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages

    draft5 1

    Many people argue that human are naturally cruel while some say no one is born with cruelty in them. After reading “The Perils of Obedience”, The Kitty Genovese Case”, and Darley and Latane’s experiments, I realized that humans acts based upon the situation and people around them in a case of emergency. Humans sometimes get confused on whether they should care about the crises or others will take care of it.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    QCF SHC 31
    • 1960 Words
    • 7 Pages

    QCF SHC 31

    Assessment method key: PD =professional discussion, EPA = examination of project or assignment, EP = examination of product, QC = questioning of candidate, O =observation of candidate, EWA = examination of written answers to questions, RPL = recognition of prior learning, EPS = examination of personal statement, ECH = examination of case history, EWT = examination of witness testimony.…

    • 1960 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes: Meditation Iii Summary Essay
    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Descartes: Meditation Iii Summary Essay

    In Descartes’s Meditations III, the Meditator describes his idea of God as "a substance that is infinite, eternal, immutable, independent, supremely intelligent, supremely powerful, and which created both myself and everything else."(70) Thus, due to his opinion in regards to the idea of God, the Meditator views God containing a far more objective reality than a formal one. Due to the idea that of God being unable to have originated in himself, he ultimately decides that God must be the cause of the idea, therefore he exists. The meditator defines God as such, “by ‘God’ I mean the very being the idea of whom is within me, that is, the possessor of all the perfections which I cannot grasp, but can somehow reach in my thought, which subject no defects whatsoever.” (70)…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Meditation 1 Summary
    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes Meditation 1 Summary

    Thus, they can be called into doubt. He is aware that if something deceives you at least one time, it will again, and therefore it cannot be trusted. This is evident when he states, “I have noticed that the senses are sometimes deceptive; and it is a mark of prudence never to place our complete trust in those who have deceived us even once” (14). This statement proves that Descartes believes that his senses’ reliability can be called into question. For example, he states that our senses are not always accurate when it comes to perceiving small and distant objects, because we may mistake a fly on the wall for a smudge if we do not look at it from a close enough distance. By doing this, Descartes discredits the first claim he makes, which says that you must believe what your senses tell you. Therefore, he has discovered that he cannot rely on his senses for his intended philosophical foundation upon which he wishes to build his…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    An Analysis of Descartes’ First Meditation
    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An Analysis of Descartes’ First Meditation

    In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon “or evil genius”. Descartes’ dream argument argues that there is no definite transition from a dream to reality, and since dreams are so close to reality, one can never really determine whether they are dreaming or not. To reinforce that argument, Descartes presents the deceiving God argument. He says that since God is all powerful, then he has the power to deceive us about reality or our dreams. But again, Descartes feels this argument is missing something, which is why he concludes with the evil genius argument. The evil genius argument’s purpose is to tie all these arguments together and strengthen Descartes’ entire argument. The evil genius argument goes like this: God is omnipotent and supremely good, which means God cannot be the one who deceives humans, rather, a separate entity -- an "evil genius, [who is] supremely powerful and clever, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me" (Descartes 492). By deceiving, I mean tricking humans that their sensations and perceptions are real, when they are indeed not real. To overcome this evil genius, Descartes says he will regard all external things as “hoaxes of my dreams, with which he (the evil genius) lays snares for my credulity” (Descartes 492). In this analysis, I will further discuss Descartes’ arguments in the First Meditation, the purpose of the evil genius argument, how Descartes attempts to overcome the power of this great deceiver, and ultimately why his attempt is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Systematic Doubt In Meditations On First Philosophy
    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Descartes Systematic Doubt In Meditations On First Philosophy

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Rene Descartes' First Meditation
    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rene Descartes' First Meditation

    Descartes First Meditation: What Can be Called into Doubt is the first of the six total meditations. He opens this meditation by restating his desire to have only true beliefs. He proposes to systematically follow a process of skeptic doubt. His doubt is not one of simply common sense, though,…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The lonely crossing of Juano
    • 356 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The lonely crossing of Juano

    THE LONELY CRISSING OF JUSN CANTEA... THE BOOK IS HORRUBLE AND EVERYONE DIES! DO NOT READ IT! HIS FRIEND IS EATEN BY A SHARK AND THE OTHER GUY GETS SHOT IN THE HEAD!…

    • 356 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes First Meditation Analysis
    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes First Meditation Analysis

    In the First Meditation, Descartes goes into depth on reflecting about the number of falsehoods and deceptions that he’s fallen for during his lifetime. This causes him to question everything that he has perceived as true or real, even something as concrete as the senses. It’s here where he attempts to deconstruct all the perceived notions and build a new foundation based on absolute truths, things that cannot be doubted. However, the most polarizing topic, and the one that I shall be arguing for today, is the idea that it is not only God who is the one that has allowed us to be deceived, but in conjuncture with a malicious demon.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes First Meditation Summary
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rene Descartes First Meditation Summary

    In Descartes work he mentions that our senses are not to be trusted, for they have deceived us once and surely will deceive us again. As he clearly stated in his meditation, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and certain I have learned either from the senses or through the senses; it is sometimes proved to me that these senses are deceptive, and it is wiser not to trust entirely…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes Sixth Meditation
    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes Sixth Meditation

    Descartes is hopeful to prove subsistence of the external world (physical objects located in space), and so he returns to a very basic stage and acknowledges the existence of minds as an immaterial substance and God. He then accepts that matter exists as long as it is not a projection of his own mind or God. As Descartes previously established the existence of God as a perfect being, he therefore has concluded that God is not a deceiver. This very clear concept leads him to accept his clear and distinct sensory experiences…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes Dream Argument
    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Descartes Dream Argument

    Descartes wishes to dismiss anything that can be doubted because he wishes to find a true foundation in which to build beliefs on. Using skepticism Descartes can find something beyond doubt to build true beliefs on. By doing so he hoped that his rationale would be accepted by the popular school of thought at the time known as “Scepticism” as well as those who, for Descartes, falsely believed in Aristotelian physics. From there Descartes can use their logic to appeal to the skeptics and ultimately persuade them away from their own mistaken beliefs at the same time. To go about doing this Descartes uses the Meditations in which a fictional meditator can illustrate the process of meditation to come to a rationalization of truth about reality. This meditator is used as a narrative illustration so that people can resonate by with the meditator by following his logical thought process and thereby use the Meditations to come to the same realizations. In doing so Descartes attempts to illustrate the most extensive logical conclusion if using skepticism properly to its most explicit nature. Particularly, that knowledge gained from sensory experience can be doubted and ultimately even thought can be nothing more than a deception. In this case, in Meditations 1, Descartes uses the dreaming argument to break down the very foundations of any and all beliefs gained via sensory experience. The First Meditation is used to begin in a position the Aristotelian philosophers would agree with by claiming that the meditators most certain beliefs come from the senses. From there he used the Meditations to subtly break down the foundations for beliefs gained by sensory experience. In doing so Descartes’ meditator is able to fend off all challengers to his skeptical argument and thus seduce people away from Aristotelian beliefs by showing that they often mislead us and can thus be doubted.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Fifth Meditation
    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page

    Descartes Fifth Meditation

    Descartes' Firth Meditiation addresses the existence of God for a second time for the purpose of revealing additional information as to his attributes. Being an ontological argument, it sheds light upon aspects of God's being, and in doing so, we may gain a better idea of not only the fact that he exists, but also how he exists. What may become evident to the reader of Fifth Meditation, although ironically not being explicitly defined as such by Descartes, is that his ontological argument for the existence of God is largely a causal one. That is to say, the meditator's idea of God (as being infinite, creatively potent, etc.) unavoidably depends upon the meditator's own origination, or, in Aristotelian terms, his efficient cause. Descartes describes something much like the causal principle in the Third Meditation as being, "obvious by the natural light that the total cause of something must contain at least as much reality as does the effect."…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

    In Descartes Meditations he questions if he is being deceived, and if so he will never truly know the truth about anything. Now that he is questioning the validity of what he knows to be true, he doubts whether…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes Third Meditation
    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    René Descartes Third Meditation

    René Descartes was a methodical and intelligent thinker, which is to be expected from the man who invented the Cartesian Plane that would eventually lead to the idea of Calculus. It is due to this measured approach that we get his Meditations on First Philosophy, and from his methodology on how to determine what is irrefutably true which Descartes calls a clear and distinct idea. In his first Meditation, Descartes determines that the only way to determine what is true is to first think nothing is true and work from there. Is it possible that the fundamentals of mathematics are false? Can two and three not be equal to five?…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics