rest of the writing. In the first chapter he argues that a standard must be established for judging moral rights and wrongs. This cannot be done without figuring out on what standard to judge human actions. He questions whether moral instinct would eliminate having to find establish a standard for judging morals. The answer is that it would not because moral instinct would only supply general principles instead of specific ones. Mill then says that there is an unestablished standard for morality and it is the principle of utility. This principle is also known as the greatest happiness principle. He ends this first chapter by discussing that he will prove utilitarianism as a theory. Since most do not seem to understand it he will provide a more clear explanation of the theory.
rest of the writing. In the first chapter he argues that a standard must be established for judging moral rights and wrongs. This cannot be done without figuring out on what standard to judge human actions. He questions whether moral instinct would eliminate having to find establish a standard for judging morals. The answer is that it would not because moral instinct would only supply general principles instead of specific ones. Mill then says that there is an unestablished standard for morality and it is the principle of utility. This principle is also known as the greatest happiness principle. He ends this first chapter by discussing that he will prove utilitarianism as a theory. Since most do not seem to understand it he will provide a more clear explanation of the theory.