Preview

Researchpaper.Doc

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Researchpaper.Doc
etween 1949 and 1953, Arthur Miller wrote two of his most famous plays. Both plays dealt with major problems in society. The main characters of the plays were similar. Also, the supporting characters of both plays were alike. Arthur Miller's plays Death of a Salesman and The Crucible are similar in many ways.
The main purpose of both Death of a Salesman and The Crucible was to show major problems in American society. In Death of a Salesman, Arthur Miller was trying to show the impossibilities of the American Dream. In The Crucible, he was trying to show how society is intolerant toward others and is prone to hysteria. Both plays dealt with society defeating the average, hard-working man. Each play showed a society that was full of deceit and liars. In both of these plays, society was depicted as an evil thing that would overpower the average person and create an unjust world.

The main characters of Death of a Salesman and The Crucible, Willy Loman and John Proctor, were alike in many ways. Both of these men had extramarital affairs, and in both cases, the affairs ended up destroying their lives. Both of these men were hard-working, average men who were just trying to make a good life for themselves and their families. Names were important to both men, and they both took pride in their names. In both cases, many decisions the two made were because of their family members. One large similarity between Willy and John was the fact that they both eventually died, and the death was partly their choice. Both men could have avoided death, but instead, they chose to die because they believed it was the correct thing to do.

In these two plays, there were also many similarities between the supporting characters. In both plays, children had much more power than they normally do. In Death of a Salesman, Willy's son controlled much of his life. In The Crucible, the girls, led primarily by Abigail Williams, caused many people to be hanged, and even more to be imprisoned.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Proctor was a main character in Arthur Miller's "The Crucible." He was a farmer in Salem, Massachusetts in the 1600's. He was put to death when he would not admit to practicing witchcraft. Minister Dimmesdale was a main character in Nathaniel Hawthorne's "The Scarlet Letter." He fathered a child out of wedlock in a sinful relationship, and fell to his death when he couldn't take the guilt any longer. John Proctor and Minister Dimmesdale had several things in common, but also had several differences.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Crucible was a play written by Arthur Miller, that was later made into a film directed by Nicholas Hytner. Both the play and the film have the same story and are very similar, yet they have some minor differences. I am comparing the scene where John and Abby meet in the woods before she has the pin inside her and the scene where Elizabeth and John meet near the ending. The theme when John and Abby meet in woods would be “Good vs. Evil”. The theme for when Elizabeth and John meetup would be “Compassion and Forgiveness”. The theme “Good vs. Evil” relates to John and Abby meeting in the woods because Abby shows a lot of her evil side to John that he didn’t know about. The theme “Compassion and Forgiveness” relates to Elizabeth and John meeting…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Miller had wrote The Crucible Because he believed that The Salem Panic was very similar to The McCarthy era since people were getting wrongfully accused of being apart of witchcraft. He was inspired to write a drama that would reflect the Salem cultural and political hysteria produced while the U.S. gov.expressed Communism in America.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though they are so similar, there are certainly some differences as well. The first of which being that John Proctor committed adultery solely out of lust whereas Arthur Dimmesdale was in love with Hester. The person who assisted in breaking down their walls was different as well. In the Scarlet Letter it was Roger Chillingworth who emotionally broke Dimmesdale but in The Crucible it was Abigail herself. But the reason they choose to break the men…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Miller's movie, The Crucible and the play both have heaps of connections and diversities. All of them help forward a underscored message in both of the productions of the Crucible. Arthur Miller diligently made it clear to consolidate countless differences from correlating the two, you can conveniently identify the changes, additions, deletions, and the character patroyal.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was also an obsession toward communism. Most people were getting very scared of communists and were trying everything they could to stop all the power they had. The H.U.A.C was an organization that was responsible for going around looking for communists and prosecuting them. This organization was led by Joseph McCarthy, and the committee hunted down many perspective communists for questioning, and Arthur Miller was in the group of people that were prosecuted. He refused to give the court any information because he disliked McCarthy. In both The Crucible and the McCarthy Era people were prosecuted based on what other people were saying and they could clear their names only by accusing others of the same crime you were committed for. Arthur Miller could see that it was a sinful cycle, and he was able to make a connection between the events from both time…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite Proctor’s death being inevitable, he realizes that he could forgive himself and regain his good name. Arthur Miller used Proctor to ascend to an extraordinary human to fight in what he believes was right, even if it costs him his life. Proctor’s life was not in vain, because he validated that, he would not sell out to an unjust court. With all the flaws John Proctor presents he died on a basis of integrity and truthfulness rather than giving into unjust conformity.…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time when “The Crucible” was written, the United States and Russia were going through the Red Scare which was a major influence when Miller was writing this play. Miller’s tactic in writing this play was to remind people of how the hysteria of the witch hunts could be dangerously similar to the communist hunts going on in the United States at the time. Using the history from the Salem Witch Trials, he wrote a story that was sure to educate people about the potential disaster that could come from the carelessness of accusing others.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the two plays, lies, gossip, and rumours affected many characters, and influenced the way they thought, behaved, and impacted their reputation. In the crucibles…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible in 1953. He wrote it because he wanted to get his message across. In the 1950’s Arthur Miller was summoned by the House of Committee on un-american activities. He was accused of being a communist. Miller was trying to get his message that the society has turned into a hypocritical society. During the 1950’s the U.S senator John McCarthy was accusing everyone who would be a threat as a communist. Since Arthur Miller was a political advocate who was against the inequalities of race in America and his vocal support of labor and the unions made him a target to John McCarthy. His basic need to respond to a phenomenon which, with only small exaggeration, one could say paralysed a whole generation and in short time dried up the habits of trust and toleration in public discourse. Arthur Miller admitted that The…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crucible Differences

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion Arthur Miller's play, The Crucible, and the movie with the same name have many differences, all of which contribute to the individual effectiveness of each in conveying their central message. These include some…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author purpose to write this story is to explain why he wrote The Crucible, what pushes him to write such a story. Arthur Miller tried to make life real by showing that things get repeated in history. The McCarthy trials are similar to Salem Witch trials. People were being accused for things that they never did and do not have any proof that they did these thing. The Crucible shows that whatever is happening now happened before, and we are repeating the history. It is important for people to remember so they do not make any more mistakes,or make up any silly stories that will affect society The anti-communist rage in the McCarthy era and the Salem witch trial in Massachusetts destroyed people's lives; the mass hysteria that swept the United States.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible Vs Mccarthy

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both The Crucible and the McCarthy era were similar because Miller used the Salem Witch Trials of the Crucible to parallel what occurred during the McCarthy era. Miller was one of several writers that were blacklisted during the McCarthy time so he experienced being wrongfully accused of something, and he had no way to overcome the accusations. Miller wrote the Crucible to indirectly describe the events that were happening in the 1950’s, by showing the abusive power of certain individuals, the effect of the power, and the fear of people in the community.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible in 1953, just when the Second World War had ended. But still there was a battle between the capitalists and the communists. Arthur Miller wrote this book because of the incidents that occurred during the 1950’s. Senator Joseph McCarthy had a feeling of communism in the United States. So he starts a witch hunt to find the communists in the United States and he targeted celebrities of Hollywood such as Helen Keller, Langston Hughes and Charlie Chaplin put them all on trial for been associated with the Communist Party. This also parallels into Arthur Miller’s Crucible where people were put on trial based on supernatural evidence such as the Red Scare when McCarthy accused people with little to no real evidence.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “And being what she is, a lump of vanity, sir- . . . She thinks to dance with me on my wife’s grave! And well she might, for I thought of her softly. God help me, I lusted, and there is promise in such sweat. But it is a whore’s vengeance, and you must see it:” (Miller 102). The Crucible by Arthur Miller shows greed and vengeance of the Salem townspeople in 1692. Miller is trying to show the government what they are doing with the communism trials and why they are so unfair. The witch trials closely mimic the communist trials in that the root of it was selfishness and greediness. Most of these characters actually lived and some of these events actually happened. Arthur Miller wrote this play to show the people what was going on was wrong. Protagonist, John Proctor, antagonist, Abigail Williams, Reverend Parris, Thomas Putnam and many others hold grudges, are immature, and selfish because of their long-term burning desire for revenge. Events happening in their life now are adding fuel to the fire.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays