Preview

Resilience of Pakistani People Against Dictatorships

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1803 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Resilience of Pakistani People Against Dictatorships
By Aasma Farhad Foundations of Pakistan lie in democracy. Democracy here means rule of the people. Like other successful democracies the power of administration is determined at the grass root level through electorate. It then moves upward in the administrative hierarchical structure and is then dispensed off downwards. Other state institutions including defense, judiciary and bureaucracy complement democracy. Though there have been incidents where one or more institutions conspired to help establish dictatorships but public resilience at large have been too overpowering to let dictatorships flourish unchecked. Consequently three of the four military backed dictators had to step down in the face of growing internal pressures. Public rejection to one man rule is what is quite uncommon in other third world countries like Nepal, Iran and China, where democracy remains a relatively new concept.
Although a country defined by an over ruling sense of religious nationalism than by geographical boundaries, Pakistan unlike Saudi Arabia or Iran lacks monolithic majority of any single sect. A country created for the political sovereignty of subcontinent’s Muslims, the society remains divided into many different religious factions within a larger Muslim community. There are Shias alongside Sunnis and then Sunnis are further categorized into Deobandis and Barelvis. Individuals further have a strong political sense of identity with their castes and baradaris. There are many small factions of the society and non-Muslim minorities as well. With such diverse ethnicities and religious pluralism, Pakistan’s survival lies in democracy. Democracy therefore, in Pakistan is as much a necessity as it is a challenge.
This month second consecutive democratic government has successfully ended up its tenure of five years and handed over its power to a care taker government. This is a great achievement for a country where military and civilian governments have been playing musical chairs



Cited: * Inam Aziz; STOP PRESS, Translated by Khald Hasan © 2009 Oxpord University Press Pakistan * Tahir Kamran; DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE IN PAKISTAN. Published 2008 South Asia Partnership Pakistan * Anatol Lieven; PAKISTAN –A HARD COUNTRY © Copyrights Anatol Lieven Newyork *

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1) As I almost always come back to, instability is a big piece of history and politics of Pakistan. There has been little to no faith in the government from the people, except from those that it benefits (which is really a small percentage).…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Large businesses are gaining power by bribing judges ("Pakistan"). The judges are supporting the businesses allowing them to take more power. This is like Napoleon bribing other pigs so he can gain power. The government of Pakistan has restricted the citizens multiple times to ensure they keep power. When Zia-Ul-Haq instated martial law for 8 years ("Mohammad") the general was trying to keep his power by instating Martial law so the citizens could not impeach him.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pakistan: A Weak State

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Internal Antagonism/Intolerance: Pakistan's 180 million people are divided into five main ethnic groups: Punjabi, Pashtun, Sindhi, Muhajirs, and Balochi (Crisis Guide: Pakistan). This diversity has caused conflict and disorder in Pakistan, affecting the economic and political development of the country. This intolerance between sectarian groups also results in suicide bombings, bomb blasts, assassinations, target killings and terrorist attacks.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pakistan Army is at war with its own people in Balochistan and FATA. The fragmented Pakistan with internal weakness and external threats is unable to refuse the Americans Orders, to get its legitimate right of Kashmir, to secure its borders with Afghanistan. Foreign investors, especially the overseas Pakistanis are examining the fear factors in opening new ventures due to corrupt financial institutions and violent groups. Consequently the vicious circle of poverty expands aggravating the already inflamed situation. The secret agencies of enemy countries find local terrorists to disrupt the system. Under the thick air of jealousy, non construction of Big dams is pushing the country into dark ages. A common citizen, suffers worst type of corruption and thus is uninterested in paying taxes. Social values, crime rate, and national patriotism, religious satisfaction are fast disappearing with growing poverty. Disengage of a citizen in election process is a clear indication of general masses’ hatred against the political, religious and military leadership. Individuals are becoming self oriented, preferring their self interest to the national…

    • 3511 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 21st century it is a common perception that democracy is the best form of governance and economic development is a fruit of democratic rule. The sole super power within European states intervenes in Third World countries to bring democracy. However watching the Third World countries go through cycles of military rule has forced me to rethink this issue. In particular I observed Pakistan where common people pinned their hopes in democracy. They believed that democracy with freedom of press and an independent judiciary will force the ruling elite to improve the lives of the common man.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the past 57 years, Pakistan’s experiences with democracy have been transitory, as brief democratic rules have been followed by prolonged military regimes.As a nation, Pakistanis have time and again refused to delearn the incremental lessons in parliamentary democracy. Due to this fact, the four military regimes that Pakistanis saw finally reverted to controlled and guided democracy in quest for legitimacy. ‘Basic democracy’ of General Ayub Khan and ‘Islamic democracy’ of General Ziaul Haq were the efforts to appease popular sentiments and ‘sustainable democracy’ of General Pervez Musharraf is also not different from the two previous experiments with democracy. All the three military dictators patronized and promoted their own factions of Pakistan Muslim League — the party claimant to be the founder of the country — to block the way of normative political forces. In order to supplement their efforts to monopolize the political sphere, the military rulers as unfair referees framed biased rules for the political game. The outcome was a paralysed parliament run by privileged puppets. So-called intellectual brigades mostly comprising retired generals and former bureaucrats nursed not only militarization of state and society but also pleaded for authoritative presidential system. However, with the exception of Ayub Khan none of the military rulers succeeded in such efforts. Ayub Khan’s so-called presidential system immediately collapsed with his ouster from the political arena. Shockingly, such debates still…

    • 6685 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pervez Musharraf has been Pakistan’s leader for 8 years and many wonder if he is doing to Pakistan what Adolf Hitler did to Germany in the 1930’s. Musharraf has told many lies since his regime came to power over Pakistan in 1999. The Asian Development Bank describes the country that is in its 60th year of independence as a country with “poor governance, endemic corruption, and social indicators that are among the worst in Asia.” A survey taken by Transparency International said that the Pakistani public perceives the first and second terms of Musharraf as being more corrupt than the first and second terms of previous administrations led by Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Shariff. Musharraf told the people that under his administration the corruption issues would be “cleaned up,” but since his take over, the corruption within the higher ranks of the military and government has only become worse. Musharraf’s rule over the past eight years was supposed to improve governmental leadership, establish new policies, and bring a brighter future for the country of Pakistan. Instead, Musharraf’s leadership has made Pakistan much worse than ever during the past 60 years.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Old and New Media

    • 15017 Words
    • 61 Pages

    Pakistan is a developing nation where digitally networked technologies and new media platforms are emerging, and where a struggle to establish democratic norms amidst authoritarian superstructures is underway. Between March 2007 and February 2008, a period referred to colloquially as the ‘Pakistan Emergency,’ a state of emergency was imposed, the constitution suspended, a popular politician assassinated, media censorship enforced, and general elections conducted.…

    • 15017 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Almost a quarter century has been passed since the death of Gen. Zia, the ruthless military dictator occurred in a plane crash near Bahawalpur, a town in the southern part of Pakistan’s Punjab province. Today, apparently no mainstream political party in Pakistan owns (at least publically) him. However, the question arises here that does this fact make this notorious character irrelevant in the social and political life of Pakistan? The answer is not only plain ‘no’ with an additional note that the presence and impact of Gen. Zia in every sphere of life in Pakistan has become much more stronger and prevalent now as compare to the era when he was alive and everything was tightly under the control of his unlawful regime.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The topic has been chosen by our group as Pakistan’s stance in the sensitive international community rests with the leadership of President Pervez Musharraf. His takeover was one-of-a-kind in the annals of Pakistan: a military regime yet no imposition of Martial Law. The coup, unlike previous ones, took everyone by surprise. Further, rumours of the coup by General Musharraf being planned were dismissed. The change in power was at a very critical and precarious time when there was a criminalization of the political system and growing economic adversity; Pakistan was being labeled as a failing state. Though democratically elected, Nawaz Sharif failed to provide a transparent administration. To the people of Pakistan, army intervention was the only way to escape a sham democracy. The fact was reinforced that the stature of army is powerful and preeminent in the country’s complex power structure. How a leader from a military background was able to improve the deteriorating domestic situation and steer the country away from foreign suspicions is significant in all respects.…

    • 7885 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concept of sovereignty in Pakistan is based on the religious interpretations which leave room for dissent and discord.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism in Pakistan

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalism is a system in which power is shared between one general and several regional or provincial governments. Power in this system is divided in such a way by the constitution that neither government has lesser powers than the other. To maintain this equal status by both levels of government, three conditions should be met; each government should have control over its finance in order to carry out its operations, no government should interfere in the decisions of the other, and no government should have the right to change the division of powers according to the constitution. The essence of federalism lies in the fact that the Centre should not interfere in provincial matters and vice versa.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sectarianism in Pakistan

    • 5493 Words
    • 22 Pages

    1) Sectarian Violence and its origins; 2) Causes of Sectarian Violence in Pakistan; and 3) Failure of State.…

    • 5493 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Amendments

    • 7522 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Constitutional history of Pakistan is dotted with various strong and weak points. It has all the major features of constitutional systems of the established democracies as inherited from British India. However, constitutional breakdowns, tensions between civil and military wings of the State, coups d ' etats, tug of war between judiciary and executive, and uncertainty about the role of Islam in the state have adversely affected the process of Constitutional development in Pakistan.…

    • 7522 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately for our country Pakistan, democracy has not lived for even half of the 65 years. Every now and then, a dictator comes and rules for a decade at least. This is not a feature of a successful nation. For a developing country like Pakistan who is surrounded by insurgent countries, dictatorship could never be appreciated. What we need are fair elections where every single voter gets their right to vote and a leader who accepts public opinion. I hope that democracy in Pakistan lives…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays