Preview

Resolute desk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
535 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Resolute desk
Resolute desk While I was visiting Ronald Regan Presidential Library the most impression on me was left by resolute desk. The Resolute desk is a big, nineteenth-century partners' desk frequently chosen by presidents of the United States for use in the White House Oval Office as the Oval Office desk. It was built from the timbers of the British Arctic Exploration ship Resolute and it was a gift from Queen Victoria to President Rutherford B. Hayes in 1880. HMS Resolute was part of a five-ship group under Edward Belcher sent from Britain in April 1852 to search for the missing British explorer Sir John Franklin, who had departed Britain in 1845 in search of the fabled Northwest Passage through the Canadian Arctic. In September 1855 an American whaler named James Buddington, saw the lost English ship Resolute floating in the parcel of ice. He split his crew and sailed Resolute back to New London, arriving home on Christmas Eve. The relationship between Britain and America was on the brink of their third war when Buddington rescued Resolute. President Pierce spoke I front of the Congress to say he had ended diplomatic relations with Britain and that he closed the British embassies and sent the ambassadors home. Unexpectedly, one of the greatest warmongers, Senator James Mason, from Virginia, proposed a bill in Congress to buy Resolute, refurbish her, and sail her back to Britain as a present. Mason bill passed and The Resolute was sent back to Britain. Resolute was towed to Cowes so that the Queen and Prince Albert could tour her, Captain Harstene presented the ship to Queen Victoria as a gesture of peace and good-will. Soon the talk of war ceased, and the gift of Resolute was seen as instrumental in the easing of these tensions. After the Resolute was fragmented, Queen Victoria asked for several desks to be built from her timbers. The queen had two desks made for her. One is given to the president and people of the United States and he is currently in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Livingston, the U.S. minister at Paris, to take two steps: (1) to approach Napoleon’s minister, Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand, with the object of preventing the retrocession in the event this act had not yet been completed; and (2) to try to purchase at least New Orleans if the property had actually been transferred from Spain to France. Direct negotiations with Talleyrand, however, appeared to be all but impossible. For months Livingston had to be content with tantalizing glimmerings of a possible deal between France and the United States. But even these faded as news of the Spanish governor’s revocation of the right of deposit reached the U.S. minister. With this intelligence he had good reasons for thinking the worst: that Napoleon Bonaparte may have been responsible for this unfortunate act and that his next move might be to close the Mississippi River entirely to the Americans. Livingston had but one trump to play, and he played it with a flourish. He made it known that a rapprochement with Great Britain might, after all, best serve the interests of his country, and at that particular moment an Anglo-American rapprochement was about the least of Napoleon’s…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1793, the British government violated international law by ordering naval commanders to begin seizing any American ship that carried French goods or was sailing for a French port. By 1794, several Hundred American ships were confiscated. Choices were to Join the British navy or be imprisoned. The British also armed Indians to attack settlers. On April 16, 1794, Washington named John Jay as a special envoy to Great Britain. They made an agreement; Jay wanted them to settle all major issues: to get the British out of their forts along the Great Lakes, to secure reparations for the losses of American shippers, compensation for southern slaves carried away by British ships in 1783, and a new commercial treaty that would legalize American trade with the British West Indies. Jay accepted the British definition of neutral rights – that exports of tar, pitch and other products needed for warships were contraband and that such military products could not go in neutral ships to enemy ports – and the “rule of 1756” prevailed, meaning that trade was prohibited in peacetime because of mercantilist restrictions could not be opened in wartime. Britain also gained most-favored-nation treatment in American commerce and a promise that French privateers would not be outfitted in American ports. Finally, Jay conceded that the British need not compensate U.S. Citizens for the enslaved people who have escaped during the war and that the pre-Revolutionary American debts to the British merchants would be paid by the U.S. Government. In return, Jay won three important points: British evacuation of their six northwestern forts by 1796, reparations for the seizures of American ships and cargo in 1793 – 1794, and the right of American…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doc 7 – according to Ernest R. May – as a result of the sunken American ships, and dead americans, Postmaster Burleson said they were at war and might as well consult the congress.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To begin with, every time the British came across an American ship, they would attack it, and then take any sailors who had once before served for the British and make them fight for them again. This continuously happened as the American’s couldn’t do anything against it. This…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author begins his discussion with how an average American is more or less aware of why The War of 1812 was fought or who we were even fighting against. Hickey informs his readers that there was no great president associated with the conflict. Although the war may be recognized as “Mr. Madison’s War,” Hickey believes that James Madison hardly reaches the standards of Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, or Franklin Roosevelt. Hickey specifies that The War of 1812’s causes are complex and can still be debated. The decisions of causes have been credited to a wide variety of motives. If the causes of the war are unclear, then the consequences are as well. Despite the fact the America was won most of their wars, The Was of 1812 is different. Hickey feels as if America was lucky to escape without making extensive compromise. The Treaty of Ghent does not specify the issues that had caused the war and contained nothing to suggest that the United States had achieved. The treaty solely provided the affairs occurring before the war began.…

    • 825 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Trent Affair Dbq

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In October 1861, James Mason and John Slidell left Charleston, South Carolina for Great Britain under the direction of Jefferson Davis. United States Navy officer, Charles Wilkes, captured the two Southern diplomats aboard the English ship known as the Trent. On their way to Britain, the two men were captured as they passed through the country of Cuba. In response to this capture, while many American Union leaders were in favor of this arrest, Great Britain, a neutral nation at the time, felt threatened by the event that had taken place. They felt that it was a violation of their neutrality and demanded that these diplomats, James Mason and John Slidell, immediately be released. Along with the release of the diplomats Great Britain was also expecting to be given an apology for this incident. In hopes to have their demands met, Great Britain threatened war if the United States did not fulfill their requests. To avoid further conflict, president Lincoln’s Secretary of State, William H. Seward, carefully studied this affair, and after careful evaluation, determined that Wilkes was in no position to arrest the two diplomats without permission. Because William Seward acknowledged Wilkes's mistake, there was no need for war. The two prisoners, Mason and Slidell, were therefor released.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Millard Fillmore writes to President Lincoln offering him advice on how to alleviate the tensions with Great Britain, caused by the arrest of two confederate officers traveling on the British Mail ship, the Trent. Fillmore is reluctant to overstep his boundaries in the matter, but his concern of going to war with Great Britain compels him to write. He explains that either the U.S. submits to Great Britain’s demands or we prepare and anticipate a coming war. Fillmore is extremely concerned in part, because they are already involved in a civil war with the Confederate states. He concludes in suggesting that the U.S. take the blame, but insist this is an international concern involving all maritime nations. Fillmore was not a man that offered advice, so the fact the he was so concerned reiterates the danger the U.S. was facing. It is another piece of evidence that correlates the situation we were facing with Great…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, being involved in the war and having enemies has a negative impact on America’s trade, “whenever a war breaks out between England and any foreign power, the trade of America goes to ruin” (102). Furthermore,…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, the aftermath of the Boston Tea Party resulted in the British Parliament wanting to make the colonists pay for their actions. Lord North, who was the Prime Minister of Great Britain, was forced with many complaints and comments from British parliament regarding their authority over the American colonists. In response to the tea account that happened on December 16, 1773, the British swiftly closed all ports of Boston for any kind of trade until all tea that was destroyed was paid for (Foner 147-148). In addition, British parliament put into action two more regulations that limited colonists’ freedom rights after the Boston Tea Party account. The push of supremacy from the British led the American colonists to stand up and fight for their freedom. Furthermore, Hewes historical account allowed American’s to receive a primary insight from a major participant regarding an event that shaped “America” into what it is today. Without the determination of the colonists to defend their liberty, we might have never had the pivotal moment that made American’s stand their ground, that led to the signing of the Declaration of…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Trent Affair

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Trent Affair, also known as the Mason and Slidell Affair, was an international diplomatic incident that occurred during the American Civil War. On November 8th 1861, the USS San Jacinto, intercepted the British mail packet Trent and removed it as contraband of two war Confederate diplomats, who were James Mason and John Slidell. The envoys were bound for Great Britain and France to press the Confederacys' case for diplomatic recognition by Europe. The initial reaction in the United States was to rally against Britain, threatening war; but President Abraham Lincoln and his top advisers did not want to risk war. In the Confederate States, the hope was that the incident would lead to a permanent rupture in Anglo-American relations and even diplomatic recognition by Britain of the Confederacy. The boarding of the "Trent" was an outrage of a national relationship, which could not escape the anger of all the nations that were bordering on the sea. The British mail packet "Trent", was taken by a person who was too stupid to foresee its bad effect, on the relations which the persons' own country was endeavoring to maintain with Europe. It produced a sensation, which for awhile, seemed to threaten the total failure of coercion. It is not surprising that on getting the full news of the event, President Lincoln said to the attorney general, "I am not getting much sleep out of that exploit of Wilkes, and I suppose we must look up the law of the case. I am not much of a prize lawyer, but it seems to me, that it is pretty clear, that if Wilkes saw fit to make that capture on the high seas, he had no right to turn his quarterdeck into a prize court." The shrewd President saw that Wilkes could not let the "Trent" go free. The President also soon realized that the rash act was very inopportune, as well as illegal. Mr. Seward hurried to communicate with Mr. Adams, the United States minister at London, the stupid suggestion that "in the capture of Messrs. Mason and Slidell on…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1650, the Navigation Acts effectuated mercantilism, but the colonists were permitted to have their own public legislature among other policies as long as goods were shipped and trade was limited to Britain to encourage its prosperity. In George Washington’s 1755 letter (document C), he expresses his want to serve in the French and Indian War, hoping to contribute to the desired victory. Following the 1763 victory, a reverend’s sermon (document E), very jubilantly thankful about the French and Indian War outcome proclaims the greatness of Britain, and how Britain will make colonies greater than before, when the French occupied the continent. However, the disdain for Britain also grew. A Massachusetts soldier in 1759 (document D), documents the social superiority held by English soldiers, and is upset by the inferior and poor treatment he is receiving in contrast to his English counterparts, and looks forward to returning home. The discussion of the British Order in Council shortly after the end of the French and Indians War (document F) emphasizes keeping the colonies in order, by issuing the Proclamation Line of 1763 to prevent colonists from moving further, for it would be more difficult to source money from dispersion, and that extreme measures including military enforcement to source as much finances as possible to profit Britain, and alleviate its…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War of 1812 Dbq

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The biggest problems with Britain came on the high seas. British naval vessels had been stopping American cargo ships for years prior to 1812 and impressing American sailors. British officers boarded the American ships in search of British deserters. They left with American citizens with no connection to the British navy. The number of American men who had been impressed by the start of the war was close to 10,000. Document 1 is a congressional report that describes Britain’s violations of our right “to use the ocean, which is the common and acknowledged highway of nations, for the purposes of transporting, in their own vessels, the products of their own soil and the acquisitions of their own industry,” The report calls Britain’s impressment and seizure of ships a direct violation of our rights as a neutral nation. The report exaggerates the frequency of these occurrences, “[Great Britain] captures every American vessel, bound to, or returning from, a port where her commerce is not favored;” Most of the ships trading with Britain had no problems, but some were stopped. One of the most well known incidents was an engagement between the American U.S.S. Chesapeake and the British H.M.S. Leopard. The Chesapeake was approached by the Leopard and the British officers tried to board. The captain of the…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Of 1812 Dbq Analysis

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1783, America won the American Revolution; this war gave them freedom from England. Twenty-nine years later, America still had many problems with Great Britain even after winning the revolution. Presidents Washington, Adams, and Jefferson tried very hard to avoid a war with Great Britain. When James Madison became President, he felt that Great Britain was being aggressive. America was not declaring war, but defending itself from a war declared by Great Britain. The main forces that led America to officially declare war on Britain on June 18, 1812, were Britain’s kidnapping or impressments of American sailors, Britain’s efforts to restrict the United States’ sea trade or maritime rights, and unofficially, the American wish to get more land in the west and from Canada.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Nationalism

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They hated “submission men” and all they wanted to do was to restore national dignity and promote national pride.War Hawks pressured John Madison to declare war against the British. The War of 1812, the United States declares war with the greatest naval power ever, Great Britain. The war occurred because the United States attempted to restrict trade and expand their territory. The British had captured the nation's capital and burned it on August. Although it looked like it was going to end badly for the Americans they ended up defeating the british in the Battle of New Orleans, which caused the United States to redeem itself. After the Battle of New Orleans, national patriotism was shown and the Treaty of Ghent ended the war. At the end of the war America felt like they’ve gain respect.It was seen as the second war of independence and started the era of national pride. In 1818, Americans and Britians agree to certain things, they agreed to share Oregan for 10…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Observe good faith and justice towards all nations, [for] Cultivative peace and harmony with all”- George Washington. This quote exemplifies George Washington’s notion on the disengagement of the United States in foreign affairs which was an highly persuasive ideology for presidents after him and the treaties they made with other nations to negotiate specific issues. For instance, the Louisiana Purchase was notably: “One of the greatest purchases of land acquisition in the United States”. After the Louisiana territory was seized by Napoleon Bonaparte and his military, the American colonists wanted to acquire the port of New Orleans as they sought lucrative economic success from trades, and therefore sent two representatives, James Monroe and Robert Livingston to negotiate the deal in French Parliament. The French were financing the Napoleonic wars and were highly in debt and were craving to refinance their economy. France could not "defend" the vast area of Louisiana and knew it was wise to make the offer to the…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays