Preview

Resource Based View

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Resource Based View
INTRODUCTION

The mid-eighties witnessed the emergence of a growing body of work collectively labelled the resource and capability-based view of the firm (RBV). In reality, Resource Competence View (RCV) first adopted an “economic” orientation. Pioneer studies (Wernerfelt, 1984) , Barney, 1986, 1991, Dierickx and Cool, 1989, Peteraf, 1993) focused on the type of resources and competencies that could offer to its owner a sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, resources and competencies approach first appeared as a theory of competitive advantage or a theory of “performance of the firm” (Argyres & Zenger, 2007).
It is only recently, in the last 20 years that organizations have started using the resource based view approach on strategy. Nowadays, they view it as the most important key development in international business research and strategic management, an approach that gives a coherent vision based on a firm's capabilities to help determine the strategic resources necessary for the firm's survival and growth within a particular market place.
As Hitt et al (2001) stated, “the resource based model assumes that each organization is a collection of unique resources and capabilities that provides the basis for its strategy and that is the primary source of return.”. It suggests that in order for a firm to sustain competitive advantage, it must not only have resources and capabilities but also have a firm control over it and they must meet certain basic criteria such as being: valuable, rare, inimitable and non substitutable such that it is impossible to be copied or replicated (VRIN).
Although a resource based view strategy sounds like the better way to go, others have wondered if this approach is at all necessary or bring any more insight than the traditional understandings into a successful strategy to survive and thrive into a competitive market, strategy that will allow the firm to have a good competitive advantage.
In this review, we aim to



References: Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, journal of management 17:99-120. Barney, J.B. McWilliams,A. , Turk,T. 1989. On the relevance of the concept of entry barriers in the theory of competitive strategy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the strategic managemt society, San Francisco. Lieberman,M.B, & Montgomery, D.B. 1998. First mover advantages, Strategic management journal, 9:41-58. Porter,M. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York. Free Press. Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York. Free Press. Porter,M. 2000. What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review. Rumelt,R. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive strategic management: 556-570. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource based view of the firm. Strategic management Journal. 5:171-180.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    BUSI 610 Group DB Forum 1

    • 2057 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Grant, R. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation (1991). California Management Review, 33, (3) 114-135…

    • 2057 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Barney, J.B. (2001) “Is the resource based ‘view’ a useful perspective for Strategic management research? Yes.” Academy of Management Review 21, 41-56…

    • 3399 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JCPENNEY

    • 3535 Words
    • 10 Pages

    5. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Jay Barney. Journal of Management. 1991 17: 99 DOI: 10.1177/014920639101700108.…

    • 3535 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hoopes, d, Madsen, T & Walker, G. ‘Guest Editors Introduction to the Special Issue: Why is there a Resourced-Based View? Toward a Theory of Competitive Advantage.’ Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp 889-902. (2003)…

    • 2493 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proctor And Gamble

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The resource-based view origins is in Economics, distinctive competencies, and general management capability; it views the firm as A collection of resources, skills, and abilities; its approach to strategy formulation is the acquisition of superior resources, skills, and abilities; according to the theory, the source of competitive advantage is the possession of resources, skills, and abilities that are valuable, rare, and difficult to imitate by…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the resource-based theory of a firm, there are two characteristics that resources must have to maintain sustainability of the firm’s competitive advantage:…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Resourceing Talent

    • 3347 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Bibliography: Barney, J (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol 17, pp 99-120…

    • 3347 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the last two decades, one of the most fundamental questions emerging in strategic management is how firms achieve and sustain competitive advantage. In a simplified world, understanding how firms achieve and maintain superior or abnormal returns means comprehending how firms position themselves in a certain market, what they produce and how they use resources at their disposal to do so. In this sense we may distinguish between the positional perspective, developed by Michael Porter, according to which achieving competitive advantage is the result of exploitation of imperfections in the market, the resource based perspective, which states that competitive advantage lies in the ownership of valuable resources, and the dynamic capabilities view, which follows the resource based view but also adds the dimension of time in the equation. In this essay, I will compare and contrast these three views after having described them, and will end by illustrating how they can all be brought together.…

    • 2407 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and Sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17, 99-120…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As is suggested by the well known Harvard economist Michael Porter, the objective of a firm is to search for, exploit, and protect opportunities to add value. Its ability to do this is dependent on its ability to keep its costs as low as possible and its ability to limit actual and potential competition. Porter believes that the fundamental factors of success are what he calls the industry attractiveness and the firm’s ability to manage its cost drivers and discusses these ideas in his successful texts, Competitive strategy(1980) and Competitive advantage(1985). These ideas however began to come under fire in the 1990’s in a Harvard business review article with the idea of competitive advantage being held with the use of core competencies “an area of specialised expertise that is the result of harmonizing complex streams of technology and work activity” (Prahalad and Hamel, 1990) and with the emergence of what became known as the Capabilities approach to firm performance or Resource Based Theory. Porter’s explanation of firm performance was questioned and economists have tried to delve deeper…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    There are various analyzing methods on strategy management. Resource based view and Porter’s five forces are two of them that represent different areas: the analysis of internal environment and external environment. The resource based view is a kind of economic tool that is used to decide what strategic resources are available to a company. The basic principle of this theory is that the fundamental for the competitive advantage of a company lies primarily in the application of the bundle of valuable resources at the company’s disposal. (Thomas, 2007) The organizational resources consist of the tangible resources (financial resources, physical resources, and structural resources) and intangible resources (technological resources, reputation resources, and innovation resources).…

    • 3034 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bussiness Plan

    • 7969 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Adler, N., 2001. Competition in a deregulated air transportation market. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(2), 337-345.…

    • 7969 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Resources Capabilities

    • 20347 Words
    • 82 Pages

    l Introduction and Objectives l The Role of Resources and l Organizational Capabilities Classifying Capabilities The Architecture of Capability l Appraising Resources and Capabilities Establishing Competitive Advantage Sustaining Competitive Advantage Appropriating the Returns to Competitive Advantage l Putting Resource and Capability…

    • 20347 Words
    • 82 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A resource or skill is said to be valuable if it contributes in formulating a strategy to improve its efficiency. If a resource or skill is posessed by a large number of companies then it is not a source of Strategic competitive advantage. The companies product or service should reflect the differentiating factors that are key buying criteria to the customers. If the key buying criteria changes over period of time, the sustainable competitive advantage would depend on how well the company influence the key buying criteria or adopt to the changes. Competitive advantage is expected to lead to superior performance indicated by financial ratios. The barriers to imitate the firms resources are bound to decay, there is a need to constantly monitor and invest in the present source of advantage and also invest in other potential sources of advantage.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the RBV theoretical background, the RBV of the firm’s was highly focused on the firm’s black box. Theoretically, the RBV is important to answer the question of why firms are different and how firms reach and maintain competitive advantage by using their resources. For instance, some researches like Selznick’s (1957) studied about the idea of an organization’s ‘distinctive competence’ is completely related to RBV. Other than that, Chandler’s (1962) studied about the ‘structure follows strategy’ and Andrews’s (1971) about the proposal of an internal appraisal of strengths and weaknesses could led to the identification of distinctive competencies. But, the idea was pioneered by Penrose in 1959. Penrose claimed that it is the heterogeneity which is basis on RBV, not the homogeneity, of the productive services available from its resources that give each firm its unique character. This study the broadly recognized by Wernerfelt (1984) which suggested that evaluating firms in terms of their resources could lead to insights that differ from traditional perspectives.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays