This expression is often used in everyday conversations and implies that if the borders are clearly defined in the sense that no one trespasses the others private property, then they are good neighbors. However, in the poem this expression is interpreted in terms of the ambiguity of borders. Considering it's the neighbor’s only line in the poem, the narrator seems to impose on us that it is not he but the neighbor who is in favor of building walls or borders. This interpretation is further emphasized when the narrator says “If I could put a notion in his head” referring that he is trying to explain to his neighbor that building walls is purposeless. Further, through lines 40 and 43, “like an old-stone savaged armed” and “He will not go behind his fathers saying”, the narrator seems to refer to the neighbor as someone with an old school thinking that does things out of habit without ever questioning their
This expression is often used in everyday conversations and implies that if the borders are clearly defined in the sense that no one trespasses the others private property, then they are good neighbors. However, in the poem this expression is interpreted in terms of the ambiguity of borders. Considering it's the neighbor’s only line in the poem, the narrator seems to impose on us that it is not he but the neighbor who is in favor of building walls or borders. This interpretation is further emphasized when the narrator says “If I could put a notion in his head” referring that he is trying to explain to his neighbor that building walls is purposeless. Further, through lines 40 and 43, “like an old-stone savaged armed” and “He will not go behind his fathers saying”, the narrator seems to refer to the neighbor as someone with an old school thinking that does things out of habit without ever questioning their